NSPCC Again

[SunsetBeetch]

"Head of ‘child safety’ at the NSPCC. More parts of a terrible jigsaw now falling into place. Can you see what it is yet? t.co/nJKd5nYt1B "

"Bizarre and concerning response of NSPCC to those worried about the antics of one of its employees maybe not so much a mystery now t.co/N0KNloLCxl "

He knows we're onto him. Too late mate.

He seems like such an appropriate choice for the job. No red flags there....

I'm sure Warwickshire Council will be in touch soon for some schools guidance.

I don't understand how this is happening.

The NSPCC have been infiltrated by men like this and they are so confident in their position they are doing this in public, in writing.

It's hard to be clear but the issue seems to be a lack of privacy opt out for 'Black, brown, trans or neurodivergent youth'; though he seems against 'controlling children' online in general.

I missed seeing the Tweet, but if he gave that list, it's proof that his argument is nothing but virtue-signalling nonsense. 'Children need privacy online - unless they're white, neurotypical children' is logically indefensible.

That tweet regarding parental internet controls

It’s the queer theory idea of getting between children and parents, that parents are not generally the people best placed to safeguard their children. That somehow institutions will do a better job

It’s dangerous bullshit

"It’s the queer theory idea of getting between children and parents"

So that's a thing in queer theory? I've been trying to read up on it but keep coming across indecipherable gobbledygook.

I don’t think it’s generally explicit, but the idea that biological families aren’t a good thing or a good way to raise children is often implicit in queer theory

That tweet is very concerning. As is the, what looks imaginary, horny pregnant women one. Three pregnant women? All reading fifty shades? Right in front of him?

Then the normalisation of porn?

At the NSPCC! Coupled with the gimp suit thing, the Bergdorf thing encouraging children to message them, and the NSPCc responding by reporting people who were concerned, It's looking absolutely atrocious.

The NSPCC has been a stalwart, traditional, utterly reliant children's charity since forever. Not some kind of weird, pervy, doubletalk den.

Regarding queer theory and parents safeguarding children, Pat Califia, one of it's well know proponents has said

‘the state is not willing to take the radical action that would be necessary to protect child victims of abusive adults. That would mean challenging parents’ ownership of their children. It would mean providing viable alternatives to the family’

This 3 part article is a great introduction to Queer Teory

uncommongroundmedia.com/the-trojan-unicorn-queer-theory-and-paedophilia-part-i-%EF%BB%BF-dr-em/

Yes it's queer theory. "Queering the classroom."

I can't remember off the top of my head who said it - but there's a queer theory proponent who wants to "outmode" parents completely - thinks that all children should be brought up by "everyone" collectively. Like some weird communist collective.

It's batshit crazy of course - but it's worrying to see the way parents are being undermined in various ways. For example, pretty soon, parents will not be able to opt their children out of sex ed lessons at school - and that's at the same time as all manner of batshit ideas are being thrown at children at school, discussions of watching porn in the classroom (great idea guys! ) and Peter Tatchell's infamous masturbation lessons. Like any kid needs lessons..

The way the heads at NSPCC seem to have no problem with children 'keeping secrets' from their parents - and now seem to actually advocate secret keeping - and privately contacting adults that are not their parents (Bergdorf) - is the exact opposite of advice given in the past. Child abuser's dream. Our children are being groomed.

"The NSPCC has been a stalwart, traditional, utterly reliant children's charity since forever. Not some kind of weird, pervy, doubletalk den."

Has it?

it's probably part of his official remit to let kids have privacy online and to help facilitate that.

www.transgendertrend.com/no-outsiders-queering-primary-classroom/

Shelley Charlesworth's article is worth a look at.

X posting everywhere

Have to go to work but will read links, thank you.

His employment history on LinkedIn is v interesting. He is a man with friends in high places I'd imagine

thinks that all children should be brought up by "everyone" collectively. Like some weird communist collective

It is something that used to happen in the 60s and 70s and children emerged with some interesting stories

Queer theory seems to throw away all that society has learned through experience.

it's probably part of his official remit to let kids have privacy online and to help facilitate that.

If it is his 'remit' then I would ask why the advice has suddenly changed to be the exact opposite of what it used to be.

And I'd remind the NSPCC of the Breck Bednar case. And the numerous cases of young girls being groomed online by adult predators.

I had to look again, just to be sure, but he really is Head of Child Safety Online for the NSPCC
Did I get that right?

Tony Stower is the Head of Child Safety Online at the NSPCC?

A man who supports online privacy for children away from their parents.

And publicly puts this on Twitter?

I'm less concerned about the (never happened) 50 Shades pregnancy triarch and PornHub twitter shitposting than I am about the suggestion that kids should be able to conceal their internet browsing from parents. Very worrying coming from someone that's supposed to be the head of child safety at NSPCC.

I can’t see his tweets now, it doesn’t say protected, or that I am blocked, it is just blank. What is that about ?
Nor can I read the responses to his tweet with the ab fab pic, apart from one, as the pic plus the one response from someone I follow appeared in my feed, but I can’t scroll through any other replies, even though there are loads.

And publicly puts this on Twitter?

Whilst hash tagging 'horny pregnant women' and normalising porn.

Ugh.

Yes. Uggh. Normalising porn, just the sort of man we want in charge of CHILD SAFETY AT THE NSPCC. Not.

it's probably part of his official remit to let kids have privacy online and to help facilitate that.

Not sure this isn't sarcasm, but assuming not:

There is a legitimate point that parents talking to children about online safety being better than solely relying on parental blocks. Especially from teens onwards being too controlling can be counter productive.

The reason I linked his (now private) thread is that none of that was present in his or the retweeted posts- I wanted to allow others to judge the comments for themselves.

There was no nuance about age in his comments, he just seemed to object to all parental monitoring. The thread he linked even suggested that schools should not be blocking and monitoring content (I can't describe how dumb this is).

Well the twitter account certainly explains why it’s becoming the NSPPC- Nat Soc for Promotion of Porn to Children.
LinkedIn account shows the gravy train progression from Oxford Uni to Head of Child Safety Online. I wish organisations such as this would seek out and mentor people with experience at a grassroots level rather than faces that fit.

Surely someone in his position should be above reproach, so why would that person need to keep their twitter account locked ?

I screenshotted the whole thread about privacy controls last night in case he deleted or went private. Also some pro tra ones. Will try and attach a couple not above.