Well, only if the intention is to make absolutely sure that girls lose out. What’s wrong with trousers, skirt or shorts for everyone?.
See, here you go again. You say it is wrong to reduce choices for girls in order that boys receive equal treatment. Ok. So increase the choice for boys. Oh no, if you increase the choice for boys then you must increase the choice for girls too.
Think of any number of areas where women get less choice or opportunity than men. In those cases the way to give equality to women is to keep men the same and to raise up the treatment of women. No one who is for equality would look at those situations and say that we should increase options for women and offer the same choices to men, in addition to the better treatment that they already receive would they? Because then you aren't achieving equality you are just maintaining the imbalance.
Well, when it comes to clothing men do have less choice and are more restricted than women so in this instance it is men who need to be treated more fairly.
Surely that is what equality is about? Removing inequality whenever and wherever it occurs?
No matter what any of you say, if a male teacher turned up at school wearing a shirt skirt you would be complaining that he was exposing himself. Female teachers at my dc school wore tennis/netball skirts in the summer so they are higher than mid thigh. Ok for male teachers to wear them then?
My dd and all of her friends would roll their school skirts up so that they were mid thigh. When she bent down you could see her knickers. Ok for the boys to turn up wearing those is it?
It just would not be acceptable for that to happen so saying let men and boys wear skirts just isn't practical is it?