Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

We do not need Trump Junior on our side

11 replies

AlessandraAsteriti · 23/07/2019 07:52

twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/1153335730246172672
I imagine all woke males will side with Yaniv now (I can see already the sympathetic takes on his vulnerable mental state). And once again women will be the collateral damage of men's ideology.

OP posts:
Erythronium · 23/07/2019 07:57

The problem with men claiming to be women is literally everybody knows they can't be, so there will be crazy right wingers
who side with us too. Recognising reality doesn't come from a particular political side.

Woke males who side with Yaniv are still bastard misogynists.

BickerinBrattle · 23/07/2019 17:33

I keep waiting for Trump to tweet that he identifies as a woman and therefore is the first female US president — just taking the piss.

What will woke males do then?

EweSurname · 23/07/2019 17:40

Left wing men should feel fucking ashamed of themselves for being even more misogynistic than the bloody trumps. Even they can see it’s wrong to compel unwilling women to handle male genitalia

OvaHere · 23/07/2019 18:00

He's not on our side though, just the side of reality (on this particular issue).

He's not someone who would have any time for British rad fems/women on Mumsnet/grassroots trade union orgs like WPUK.

No point worrying about how US right wingers view someone like JY. Of course they don't think JY is a woman, nobody does, not even the idiots trying to drum up a pathetic defence.

TWAW and acceptance without exception are ideological political slogans not sincerely held beliefs for most people that spout them.

BickerinBrattle · 23/07/2019 19:56

Yes. I'll believe straight woke men believe TWAW when they start sucking female cock, and I'll believe gay men belive TMAM when they start diving face-first into mangina.

Put your money where your mouth is, guys. Or put your mouth where your money is. Until then, quit lecturing women about what WE have to accept without exception.

Lumene · 23/07/2019 20:21

What worries me about this is the backlash from actual far right bigots and those unconcerned with human rights. If the likes of the Guardian and Left wing and centrist MPs won’t allow a proper discussion of the obvious rights conflicts and issues, there are plenty of those like the Trumps who are happy to jump on this.

LangCleg · 23/07/2019 23:09

Trump Junior is as entitled to object to extremist genderism as we are or anyone else is. It doesn't mean he's on the side of feminists - blindingly obviously, he isn't.

A lot of the far right gobshites with huge followings are taking an interest in the Yaniv case.

The backlash is beginning and these idiots will wish they had come to an accommodation with feminists and people who believe in child safeguarding. Lifelong leftists, most of us. They're about to find out what the actual far right looks like instead of the leftist women they've been perfectly safe to defame as such.

I have no sympathy whatsoever. None.

BickerinBrattle · 24/07/2019 00:09

With you there, Lang

Women will do as we always have and look out for each other and for children.

WeirdWoman · 24/07/2019 01:01

The right is no friend to women, and niether is the left.

We need to stop waiting for the left to “come around”. They won’t. Even if they did, there would still be the issue of sex work, surrogacy et al.

We need to abolish left and right. Let’s focus on women-focused policies.

LikeothersIamjustme · 24/07/2019 10:27

Bickerin - that would be brilliant!

Barracker · 24/07/2019 10:46

Sides schmides.

The only sides are reality and fantasy.
It does not help me to wish my enemies would choose fantasy and leave reality to me.
I want enemies and friends both to choose reality.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page