Man exposed himself to 5 yr old in supermarket aisle

[failingatlife]

Just heard this on the radio. Shocked at how brazen this man was. But hey its all good, women are just hysterical bigots for being wary of males.

www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/man-exposed-genitals-girl-5-17427142.amp

Kirk

Bird responded directly to me so I responded to her. I thought that's who debate worked.

You posted before bird

Your first post was a question, who was it arguing to?

It is only now that I realise the full horror or what happened to me as a naive 17 yr old - I was flashed by a random man in a pub next to the pool table as I stood minding my own business.. in full view of the whole pub. Everyone laughed, I was soooo humiliated, I blushed and felt such shame. It doesn’t take long for a man to unzip and flop it out. . That poor child, and the mother.

If men are capable of this in public, who’s to say what they’d be capable of in private.

But if it's a ladycock it's completely different.

LL83 : I don’t follow. How does it show that single sex toilets are not the solution?

My first was yo the OP who suggested some people would think this was a good thing.

My following posts were to bird who suggested the NSPCC would think this is a good thing.

Keep up.

My first was yo the OP who suggested some people would think this was a good thing

Some would, are you claiming peadophiles don't exist?

Keep up.

It took me 3 posts to get you to clear up who you were arguing against, I'm not the one having trouble keeping up.

Where did the OP say it was “a good thing”?

siring1

Would you say the man was the only person in history with this fetish?

If you don't think that then clearly you admit some people find it good.

If I'm going too fast for you and not breaking this down enough, let me know.

I'm arguing with Birds suggedtion that the NSPCC think this incident is a good thing.

Are you familiar with the NSPCC incident others have alluded to?

Or familiar with the concept of the female penis, the exposure of which is not a problem in female spaces where girls are also changing because it’s, you know, female.

Ask Girl Guides, they’ll explain it to you. I believe that in deciding the female penis posed no problems for females, they consulted the NSPCC along with others.

@siring1
As a full time lurker and name changer, I'll tell you a few things. Anyone who rocks up on FWR and tells the mostly Female posters that they're womaning wrong will always get a hard time.
This is about protecting children.
Many of the Women that post here have been through incredibly hard times at the hands of men that have abused them.
Many of them are Lesbian in their sexual orientation and have suffered humiliation and degradation for being Lesbian.
Many of them are just so fucking pissed off with the current climate of the juggernaut that is destroying Women's rights.
Many of them are also fucking pissed off of a lifetime of being regarded as second class citizens.
Also on this particular thread.
Fucking hundreds of them are really absolutely fucking pissed off at the total lack of care and concern shown by the NSPCC.
So get on your bike and off you fucking pop.

siring1
But hey its all good

Where on earth did siring1 say that

Where on earth did siring1 say that

I said that siring did not.

What made you think that post was connected to siring?

The OP said this.
I asked who thinks it was a good thing and I was told the NSPCC think men getting their cocks out in front of children was a good thing.

My mistakes:

I disagreed with a feminist.
I thought when somebody said something that was what they ment.

What's wrong?

My opinion in that post?

Well reading back, even I can see that @Siring1 will have been referring to the two questions that said everyone's entitled to their fetish right, right?
Siring said wrong, wrong.

siring1
But hey its all good

CaptainKirks the bit quoted above bit wasn't you - it was dpm. With Sirings name next to it. So it was addressed to her.
Siring never said it was all good so when you put that next to the name it looks like she said it was.

You were arguing before bird posted.

Hahahaha! In such a hurry to tell off the women they didn't even pay attention to what they were complaining about. How fucking rubbish is that?

CaptainKirks the bit quoted above bit wasn't you - it was dpm. With Sirings name next to it. So it was addressed to her.

Sorry i said the same thing in my post.

"Ffs. If there were actual consequences for this type of behaviour I'm sure they'd manage to control themselves. But hey why should women and kids matter?"

To be fair it is not just women and children, my husband would be pretty distraught if someone did that to him, although doesn't compare to a child obviously.

I don't think you made a mistake siring1, i do find it a bit weird that when asked to clarify who you are arguing with, because your question didn't have any related to the OP and your answer was a poster who posted a question in response to you a bit weird.

I'm unsure how feminists are to blame, I'm assuming you are not one, neither am I?

Just follow the first 8 posts and read all of the the words Roses including the OP.

spitefulbreasts well put.