All the "non-sexual" furries and pup play people will eventually admit, ok, they have "cuddle parties" and other clearly sexual gatherings, or engage in clearly fetishistic behavior but deny its sexuality.
It's not surprising. People who have erotic target location errors, like believing the best sex partners are the cartoons they watched as kids, or who think it's sexy to be diapered and changed, are often surprisingly unobservant of their own obvious-to-everyone-else-in-their-lives reluctance to engage in normal human sexual relationships.
These types of "you always have to be dominant/submissive" relationships are also highly immature, and engaged in by people who clearly have no idea how to engage in normal relationships.
No, I won't take that back for the next person who gets offended by this generalization. I"ve met plenty of people in BDSM relationships, and was involved in the community for years. The immaturity and black-and-white thinking that was prominent among community members was stark, and the "munches" were clearly a place for local losers to congregate. There'd always be a couple of naive teenage girls, and loser immature 50-something men who were there for the easy prey.
I'm tired of Pride and the "open minded" crowd rolling over at these ridiculous "sometimes furries/pup play/BDSM is totally non-sexual, guys" ideas. The fact that some of these people who are uncomfortable with normal human sexuality are also not comfortable calling their sexual urges "sexual" isn't shocking.