We need a new category for people with DSDs that confer male advantage.
-Male
-Female
-Specific DSDs
Resisting it is utterly futile, because, we are already there - the female category is already dominated by XY medallists in several sports.
The question isn't whether XY DSD athletes get to compete in their own category, because the female category is becoming the de facto XY DSD category anyway.
The only remaining question, is whether it suffices to have two XY categories only, or whether XX females - half the global population, deserve a category of their own, once again.
Inclusivity?
We've engineered a situation that excludes the entire female population from competing with each other because we can't bring ourselves to acknowledge the importance of their physical similarities, AND DIFFERENCES - from men, from people with DSDs that confer male advantage, and from any man who believes he can identify into a physical category to which he does not belong.
I read an article by a man with PAIS, the condition that seems most probable to be affecting Semenya. This particular man was assigned male at birth, by UK medics, but Semenya was assigned female, by the elder women in the village, according to Semenya's father.
This man was advocating FOR Semenya to compete with women. Despite the fact that he himself would not be eligible, having been correctly assigned male, and despite the fact that judging his own circumstances, which included having testosterone treatment, makes him potentially LESS naturally masculinised than Semenya.
At the heart of all of these arguments is the implicit assumption that 'female' is a category whose parameters must be decided by men.
When, in fact, we are a group of humans belonging to the same reproductive sex class. We exist, as a discrete group, whether men contrive to blur the parameters of our existence or not.
We are not a vacuum into which men can inject their preferred meaning.