"I mentioned a few pages back that basically anything more than a unisex boiler suit to preserve modesty and the plainest food sufficient to provide sufficient calories is unnecessary."
Yes you did didn't you? When you were mischaracterising my argument because you can't actually make a decent response to what I'm actually saying.
What's funny is that in your zeal to misrepresent my arguments you just ended up describing patriarchy. There are people who like to put people in uniforms and actually go ahead and do it. I'll give you a clue though, it's not feminists. Men's institutions are full of uniforms - the army, the police, schools, Mao's China, the priesthood - full of people, mainly men dressed the same, individuality erased. I'm sure you must be up in arms about that.
Same with the resitricted boring diet that you were lying that feminists want us to have. What do you think the diet industry feeds to women? That food is awful - low fat spreads, low fat cheese, low calorie ready meals, liquid shakes instead of decent food. Weird meals with lettuce, eggs and grapefruit or cabbage soup. Disgusting, but something that women are expected to eat if they want to be thin and thus acceptable.
I don't expect either of those real phenomena to bother you though Lass. You're too busy having a pop at imaginary things you've decided feminists must want. I don't know if it's because you don't understand the arguments, or you understand them well enough but have to mischaracterise them in order to make any kind of an argument. Either way it's tedious.