Our favourite genderology professor from Leeds does it again.

[HerFemaleness]

twitter.com/sally_hines/status/1110614526142095362

''A woman, for me, is someone who feels that they are a woman.''

Then somebody asks Sally if she feels like a woman. To which Sally replies

''Well I don’t feel strongly that I’m not so yes.''

And then Vulvamort wins the internet with this.

''So, to recap:
You don't feel like the thing.

But you don't feel strongly that you're not the thing that is a thing because it feels like a thing.

So you've concluded you ARE the thing.

Having earlier said: the thing is anyone that feels they ARE the thing.
Which you don't.''

“It’s the politics we place on perceived biological materialities that bring about patriarchy not bodies themselves.”

Surely the whole point of a materiality is that is exists, not that it is ‘perceived’? And yes, this is the exact reason why women (in possession of the ‘biological materialities’ need a protected space from the patriarchy.

Does she realise that she is arguing against herself?

Sally Hines’ tweets are protected now so i’m sure she’ll be back very soon with a published peer-reviewed high impact journal article articulately setting out her theories on biological reality.

Every grad from Leeds is not a fuckwit.

Too right!

I like this answer:

Q. What does it "feel like" to be a woman?

A. I’d say horrific menstrual cramps, a constant nagging feeling you’re being gaslit, an impending sense of doom plus a dash of guilt. Oh, and sore tits.

Still not convinced anyone leading this movement isn't trolling.

Fachidiot has just been tweeted as word of the day by the qi twitter handle!

😏