A breach of the peace really does not look like pizza-eating lesbians with tickets a ticketed ‘inclusive’ public discussion event, doubtless intending to ask some questions of the panellists. In the Q&A session at the end.
The Telegraph article has four relevent quotes which appear to have some significant disparities:
Commander Jane Gyford of the City of London Police said: “Police were called by security guards of a private property on Fenchurch Street at 18.26 on Thursday 21 March 2019. The security guards reported a group of four people who were causing antisocial behaviour and refusing to leave the property. Officers attended to assist the security guards and ensure there was no breach of the peace.”
It also has a quote from Accenture representative:
A spokesperson for Accenture said: “Our request was based on security concerns expressed to us by participants at last night’s events. Although an unfortunate situation, we made a polite request that several individuals leave the gathering. Upon their refusal, we sought assistance.”
The Police Officer quote (recorded in the YouTube footage):
One of the officers who attended Accenture’s offices told the women: “Our legal framework here is to prevent a breach of the peace and that’s what you guys are going to do. We’ve been told you’re being disruptive and you need to leave the premises or we will be forced to remove you.”
At the event, however, Ms Pradip [ Pride in Accenture diversity network ]told the women: “My panel does not feel comfortable with you here”.
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/03/22/seven-police-officers-sent-remove-four-women-inclusive-talk/
What were the alleged security concerns?
What does 'causing anti-social behaviour' look like?