Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

R4 PM to discuss transpeople in sport before 6

151 replies

MrsBodger · 25/02/2019 17:04

Just announced at top of programme.

OP posts:
DonaldTwain · 25/02/2019 20:25

Look can somebody be give this McKinnon dipshit 10 minutes every night peak time to broadcast. I reckon it would take three days max for the entire self Id movement to be fucked beyond all remedy. McKinnon is literally the worst advertisement you could invent.

TowelNumber42 · 25/02/2019 20:40

I agree Donald. I love how McKinnon explained how it is a myth that human beings can be easily classified as men and women. Also that men aren't actually bigger and stronger than women.

RM has spent so long in the the t**f-blocked bubble that RM forgets all people are quite familiar with human beings.

It's not like RM is David Attenborough talking about some exotic wild creature as we all went oh, look at those creatures, the male and female are almost indistinguishable, even in the genitalia, and they have similar strength, how interesting, do tell us more Prof McKinnon.

borntobequiet · 25/02/2019 21:02

McKinnon’s speaking voice is one that you automatically tune out. It’s simultaneously monotonous and irritating. Perhaps it’s a factor in them being so reliant on Twitter.

BernardBlacksWineIcelolly · 25/02/2019 21:03

did anyone else wonder if Rachel had picked up on the woman winning a shooting event at the olympics from the FPFW uninvited thread on here?

BigGoat · 25/02/2019 21:09

I was just about to say that born, I was very shocked to find myself utterly bored by the shite RM was spouting.

I couldn’t find logic in it or much of interest, the social construction of gender in dart playing.. ffs.. at least tell us about the spectacular hat trick that allows you to steal women’s rightful position on the podium right before their eyes.

bluescreen · 25/02/2019 21:29

No, I don’t think they could “identify” as intersex as that is a condition which can be diagnosed, not an identity.

Unlike say, male and female morphology and DNA?

Grin
pombear · 25/02/2019 22:33

I hope the usual transcribers don't mind me blundering in here, as I listened to this and wanted to transcribe it fully (thanks Orchid for the summary) as I felt it was important to lay out the words in full. So here it goes...

pombear · 25/02/2019 22:36

Transcript of R4 RM/ED/SD intervew part 1:

ED: There is a growing row as to whether or not transwomen should be competing against natal women, people born as women, in women’s sport There was a girls track race in Connecticut earlier this month - transwomen won the first two places and some say this is distorting women’s sport and it’ll do so more, as more social attitudes change and more people feel free to redefine their gender at birth.
Now this is a somewhat a different debate to whether people who are born intersex can compete - that’s the one Caster Semenya is litigating at the moment but the trans debate rapidly becoming one of the most fraught issue in sport.
Now earlier I spoke to Rachel McKinnon. She’s a world champion cyclist, trans, a professor of philosophy, and an activist as well, and I asked her whether gender, which is sometimes seen as subjective, and psychological, or biological sex, should be the factor for determining distinction for sporting purposes.

RM: it’s important to recognise that the IOC and therefore any international sports organisation and every national Olympic committee, they do not make any distinction between sex and gender, Also many governments so the Canadian government, the US government, the British government, they treat sex and gender interchangeably, so on my birth certificate it says female, which is a sex term. None of my identification says woman on it, they all say female and so for the purposes of sport in a 2015 court decision at the court of arbitration for sport, they take your legally recognised sex or gender as your sex for sport.

ED: But you’re not making the contention, are you, that sex and gender are literally the same thing, you’re saying we treat them as the same thing. Or are you saying they are the same thing?

RM: They are both socially constructed concepts and categories. Gender is made out of social stuff and sex is made up of biological stuff…

ED: Yeah, that’s not social construct is it, I mean, many babies are born boys and many babies are born girls. There are non-socially constructed differences there, clearly, aren’t there?

RM: No, actually, pick a natural physical characteristic we can find boys that have it and girls that have it.

ED: Can I ask you this, this is important. Taking what you say, why do we have separate sport for women and men?

RM: Well, just to finish the point, there are many intersex conditions. Around 2% of the world’s population has some form of intersex condition. That is 140 million people worldwide, so this is not an aberration. These are lots of people. There are ways, for example, for someone to be born with XY chromosomes, to produce testosterone but they have complete androgen insensitivity syndrome so they develop as phenotypically female from birth. There are ways to be XX and yet develop male. There are XXY, there are XYY, there’s an XO chromosome make-up, so the idea that there are only two sexes and that we can neatly carve them up based on biology is a fiction.

ED: Mmm. I think, you know, there are cases, the Caster Semenya cases, going through the court for arbitration for sport, that precise issue is being dealt with. But that would take you, I think, to some extent, back to biological interpretations of the difference, would it not?

RM: No. The point behind the (?) court of arbitration for sport decision and what I fully expect in the Caster Semenya case is that there is no scientific evidence supporting a testosterone limit on women.
All of the current scientific evidence we have shows no relationship between endogenous natural testosterone and performance.

ED: Can I ask you this, do you think it is transphobic to ask the question whether you are close enough to biologically female that you should be in, if you like, the female sport, the women’s sport?

RM: I don’t think questions in themselves per se are transphobic, but there are absolutely transphobic ways to ask questions. it is not the case that anyone who supports trans-inclusive sport has called someone transphobic merely because they disagree with us. However, the ways in which these people like Martina Navratilova are disagreeing with us are transphobic because they’re based on irrational fears, misleading and lies about transwomen.

D: I wonder how you will ever convince people that born male, identifying as female, is the same thing.

RM: So there’s always going to be people I can’t change their mind. But first again, there is no relationship between performance and endogenous testosterone . The second is that is a myth that all men have more testosterone than all women. In fact, if you look at the graph of the distribution of natural testosterone values, the men’s values go all the way to the bottom of the bottom of the women’s values. So the men’s values go from basically 0 up to about 40 or 50 ng/dl per litre, the women’s range go from about 0 to 20 to 30 ng/dl per litre. Also 16.5% of elite men are already within the female range of testosterone. There is no relationship between testosterone and performance between endogenous. There is a relationship between exogenous, which is why it’s doping. The final point I want to make is that some sports are gender-segregated not for biological reasons but for social reasons, for example I’d like to talk about the Olympic shooting event back in in, I believe it was 1992, it was not gender segregated men and women competed together, a Chinese woman, Zhang Shan, won the gold medal in the 1992 Olympics , in the 1996 Olympics they gender-segregated the sport, and did not offer a women’s event, so the idea we only gender-segregate sport because of biological reasons is a lie, we gender-segregate darts, billiards, and all kinds of other sports that there is no physical justification for, there’s only a social justification. And it’s not only a social justification.

ED: Rachel McKinnon. World champion cyclist. Trans activist. Let’s get some comments on what you’ve just heard there from Sarah Ditum, columnist, critic, a feminist. Could we start Sarah with that last point that the distinction between male and female support is not about biology because we distinguish in things like shooting which the biology doesn’t really play any part?

dragoning · 25/02/2019 22:37

Thanks pombear! Bedtime reading.

pombear · 25/02/2019 22:38

Transcript of RM/ED/SD interview part 2:

ED: Rachel McKinnon. World champion cyclist. Trans activist. Let’s get some comments on what you’ve just heard there from Sarah Ditum, columnist, critic, a feminist. Could we start Sarah with that last point that the distinction between male and female support is not about biology because we distinguish in things like shooting which the biology doesn’t really play any part?

SD: Hmm I think it’s very interesting that Rachel conceded that some sports are segregated on the basis of biological difference. Obviously when you’re talking about something like shooting, that isn’t based on physical prowess…

ED: But we do distinguish there, we do separate, that sort of tells you….that sort of tells you it’s not a protected biological characteristic….[under Sarah’s comment]

SD: It doesn’t tell us that that applies to all sports although it does tell us that because women’s sports are chronically underfunded, if you don’t have specific sports for women that women do tend to get pushed out if it’s mixed
But if you’re talking about anything that involves physical strength, anything where height is an advantage, grip strength or bone density or muscle mass then being male is a massive physical advantage over being female.

ED: And do you, do you accept, as she raised the issue of the intersex debate. Now Martina Navratilova who’s criticised transwomen’s participation in women’s sport, has been very warm towards intersex people who’ve lived as, women, born with a lot of male characteristics but has no problem which has no problem with Caster Semenya taking part in in women’s sport. with Cas S taking part. In women’s sport D you see any cross over Do you take M N point?

SD: They are simply not the same thing, RM is being disingenuous by blurring the lines there. RM is not an intersex woman, she’s a transwoman which mean’s she’s male, which means she has all the physical advantages of being male. Erm, I think there is an issue around fairness when it comes to with women with disorders of sexual development which means they might have, like, stronger musculature or greater height than average, or elevated testosterone levels but that is something that has to be dealt with sensitively and fairly and in complete distinction to the issue of whether male athletes should be able to compete as women.

ED: We might get tied up in a sort of scientific debate here. RM was making some claims about endogenous testosterone and performance not linked. I was surprised by that. I haven’t looked at it and just assumed that high testosterone, endogenous, exogenous, whatever it is, would give you a huge advantage in sport. Do you, have you looked at the science? Do you accept…her claim there?

SD: Your immediate testosterone results on any particular day don’t necessarily dictate your performance. But the flood of testosterone that the male body experiences at puberty does mean greater height, greater strength, greater muscle mass, greater grip strength and all those things that lead to a greater physical advantage, so I mean really, it’s erm, I think, it is quibbling to focus on this issue of testosterone levels. It doesn’t address the issue of whether it’s fair for male athletes to compete against women in competition. And when you’re talking about, say, a full contact sport, you’re really talking about something where, erm, Fallon Fox a transwoman who’s a fighter in UFC like, it is, there are serious safety considerations when it comes to a full contact sport where a male is fighting a female athlete.

ED: You’d be very happy with transwomen taking part in the women’s sports, like shooting, where biology isn’t really, is not really a significant issue?

SD: Erm, I don’t really, I don’t really understand why, if Rachel McKinnon if RM doesn’t think physical sex affects athletic ability why she’s not willing just to compete in male sport. Erm…

ED: But doesn’t that get, at a broader view, aren’t you really just saying
you don’t like the idea of trans, isn’t that what you’re saying there, she wants to identify as a women

SD: (Under E..No, I don’t think…) I would really like to, like to push you back on what and that’s a very unfair construction of what I’ve said. What I do object to is the fact that it’s women sports that is being put under this particular pressure. That’s something that Joanna Harper, who informed the IOC’s decisions on inclusion of trans sport has said, that the rules on including trans people in sport are going to put more pressure on female athletes than on male athletes, it’s going to be female athletes who lose funding, who lose podium places, who lose the chance to compete at international level

ED: You mean natal female athletes, you’re…

SD: I mean female athletes. Erm,

ED: Well that’s again, you’re saying that Rachel McKinnon isn’t a female athlete.

SD: Well if Rachel McKinnon wasn’t a male athlete, then she wouldn’t be trans. I mean it’s a very strange hai- splitting argument. Sex is a real thing. it is highly relevant to athletic performance and it’s a very strange situation were we’re supposed to pretend that it doesn’t matter. Because it’s going to mean female athletes are pushed out of competition.

pombear · 25/02/2019 22:40

And out of all of that, what's most interesting is the question that never gets answered:

ED: Can I ask you this, this is important. Taking what you say, why do we have separate sport for women and men?

RM: avoid, change the subject, ignore the question.

Why eh?

Mumoftwoyoungkids · 25/02/2019 22:45

Pick any natural physical characteristic and boys can have it and girls can have it

A penis!

HumberElla · 25/02/2019 22:54

Pick any natural physical characteristic and boys can have it and girls can have it

Ability to run 100m in less than 9.6 seconds?

pombear · 25/02/2019 22:56

Mum A penis!

Yup.

And to Evan's lament We might get tied up in a sort of scientific debate here. Woe that a journalist may get tied up in some sort of debate about facts rather than feelings here. Shock R4 shocker - let's not look at science, s'not important!

dragoning · 25/02/2019 22:58

Pick any natural physical characteristic and boys can have it and girls can have it

Possession of ovaries? Sperm producing testicles? Endometrium?

Iused2BanOptimist · 25/02/2019 23:06

Gender is made out of social stuff and sex is made up of biological stuff…

I laughed out loud when Rachel said that. Why you don't need to know what you're talking about indeed.

Iused2BanOptimist · 25/02/2019 23:08

did anyone else wonder if Rachel had picked up on the woman winning a shooting event at the olympics from the FPFW uninvited thread on here?

Yes I thought what a coincidence. Has Rachel mentioned shooting before? Seemed like a new line of arguments to me.

pombear · 25/02/2019 23:09

I have a feeling RM is lurking here (waves to RM Grin )

Rach, this isn't going as well as you may think.

But if you're around, I'd reallly appreciate you answering Evan's question you left hanging on R4 today about why sport is separated between males and females, that you forgot to answer.

Without any diversion into testosterone levels, shooting, or intersex arguments.

Oooh,and as Sarah pointed out, if you've acknowledged that there are some sports not segregated due to physical differences, like darts and billiards, well, why are those other sports segregated because of physical, not social, differences? Seeing as you don't see any physical differences? (Apart from exongenous differences, hence 'doping'...which means, there's def a difference, hence cheating?) Soo confused from the UK. Looking forward to a better understanding.

OrchidInTheSun · 25/02/2019 23:12

Thanks Pom! Ditum was brilliant

EatCashews · 25/02/2019 23:35

RM has some fans in Leeds ...

twitter.com/sally_hines/status/1100093192295333888

Binglebong · 25/02/2019 23:45

《Waves to RM》 I shall expect my research fee for mentioning shooting in the post.

Can anyone tell me when they started this item on the recording? Dont have time to listen to it all.

CakeFlowers For the wonderful transcribers.

ToeToToe · 26/02/2019 00:12

Oh, I just listened. Sarah was fantastic. She just wasn't having any of the nonsense at all.

You mean natal female athletes? I mean female athletes - sex means something.

Fan-bloody-tastic. Even R4 knows sex isn't a social construct.

ToeToToe · 26/02/2019 00:14

Rachel McK trying to conflate intersex women to endorse males competing with females Hmm

Iused2BanOptimist · 26/02/2019 00:27

Too good not to share. Don't the women look happy.

R4 PM to discuss transpeople in sport before 6
R4 PM to discuss transpeople in sport before 6
TimeLady · 26/02/2019 07:42

Thanks for the transcriptFlowers