Just catching up on this and haven't read all comments but does anyone else suspect that the non-binary brigade are going to jump on this as I actually think craziness could go one step further.
I think you may be right about this. I came across this article when I was looking for coverage of the Canada Games (I am in Canada but these games are not that big deal and there hasn't been a huge amount of coverage.) vancouversun.com/news/local-news/new-policy-allows-canadian-trans-student-athletes-on-teams-consistent-with-gender-identity
But he is critical of the policy’s absence of language to include non-binary athletes, who don’t identify as either male or female. This is a common shortcoming of policies aimed at inclusivity, he said.
“It’s great that they have selection power, but if there is no corresponding category for them to select that is authentic to who they are, it’s really a bit of a moot point,” Scott said. “Oftentimes, they have to make tough decisions if there are only binary sports divisions — which is the majority of sports.”
This issue could be resolved by splitting divisions and teams by categories rather than only gender, such as by muscle mass, hormone level or weight class, Scott said.
Other solutions to explore could include dividing athletes into categories by their best competition times, or adding a third category to events where non-binary participants can compete, Scott added.
There are so many issues with all of these suggestions (except the last one). Divide athletes based on competition times? Suddenly the 768th fastest man in the 2018 100m sprint is challenging for Flo Jo's all-time world record. In most sports women's results would be so mediocre by comparison that they likely would be pushed out of competition altogether. Can't these women who identify as non-binary see that THEY TOO would be entirely pushed out of sport using rules like these? Utter madness.