Canadian tribunal rules that ball waxers are the most oppressed group in society

[QuietContraryMary]

www.bchrt.bc.ca/shareddocs/decisions/2019/jan/24_X_v_Hot_Mess_Salon_2019_BCHRT_24.pdf

"I
amalsoconsciousandentitledtotakejudicialnoticethattheissueoftransgenderism,whichisengagedinthecaseofX,isonethathasrelativelyrecentlycometothefore.Asaresult,thedegreeofmisunderstandingandmarginalizationoftransgenderedpersonsisperhapsgreaterthananyothermarginalizedgroupinCanadiansociety.
[12] ItakeintoaccountaswellthatwhileIhavedeterminedthattheprecisewordsoftheemailsreliedupondonot,inmyview,createadirectthreatofviolence,emailsofthissortare certainlycapableofstirringthepotwiththosewhoarethreatenedortriggeredbythetransgenderedpopulationofCanada.
[13] Inthecircumstances,Iamsatisfiedthatthereisajustificationtosupporttheapplicationforanonymization."

I.e. the complainant, who likes to ask 10 year old girls about their periods, should be made anonymous in lawsuits to force women to wax his testicles.

Because, oppression is not getting your balls waxed. Harassing little girls is not oppressive, however.

Looks like the spaces got waxed in that quote.

Clearly the judge has never heard of First Nations people.

The level of ignorance and arrogance is astounding.

Are we sure this is the original Balldemort, JY? I am just confused because it refers to "X" instead of JY.

And yes, the thousands of murdered and missing First Nations women can't hold a candle to X's ballwax oppression... (/snark, obviously, mucho /snark)

Yes, it's the same Balldemort

What is the point of anonimyzing the case when the whole world knows who the balls belong to?

X filed a complaint against Hot Mess Salon alleging that it discriminated against her in the area of accommodation, service or facility on the basis of sex [Complaint], contrary to s. 8 of the Human Rights Code [Code].
So the court recognises this person as a man? So could any man turn up to the salon and take them to court if they were refused this service?
Also, Hot Mess Salon is an odd choice of name.

So there's no threat and the judge acknowledges that, but will grant anonymity anyway because having the fact that a transwoman has been harassing women who do waxing and trying to force the justice system to facilitate it become public knowledge makes trans activism look bad?

The only threat is to Yaniv's feelings.

Are these cases still ongoing? I thought at least one had been dropped after the woman pointed out certain evidence against the ballsy one. Why haven't the other women quickly done likewise?

I thought at least one had been dropped after the woman pointed out certain evidence against the ballsy one

Very likely not all complainants are aware of the other cases being brought. They may also not have access to assistance.

I noted even Oger is distancing themselves from Balldemorte.
I hope the Canadian tax payer wises up to what's happening.

Sorry but.... Balldemort 😂😂😂

I vote for the waxee to get their wax. I believe there are specialist sex workers who will oblige in inflicting such pain for a few.

I believe there are specialist sex workers who will oblige in inflicting such pain for a few.
In a big city like Vancouver, there'll be dozens, all relatively easy to find. But this particular waxee isn't interested in buying a service - it's pretty clear this waxee gets off on humiliating ordinary working-class women who don't have the financial power to object. Paying a sex worker who can pick and choose her customers wouldn't give the same kind of thrill at all.

I know - the waxee might not enjoy but a professional sadist might.