I'm with Coyocan.
I admire most if not all the women who have stood up to defend our rights.
I suspect I would find some hard to work with. I can forgive a lot given how stressful it must be to stick up for, and devote time and energy to something you believe in. I also respect the diversity of views and motivations.
I have no idea what Venice's issue is. It may be valid. It may not. Trouble is that this and previous threads where there is open disagreement, other posters seem to gleefully rush in almost as if they enjoy the ruckus.
I admire Venice for defending herself, both in court and out. I admire Rosa for leading a fightback for free GC speech on campus and for the work she did in Scotland. (Though not for her football allegiances.)
And back to the 'is Rosa being sued or not' court action seems really hard to follow from the outside. People often are constrained in what they can say. So Miranda suddenly pops up in court or a flying lawyer brags about some sort of win, which just seems to be a settlement with perhaps a non disclosure. Linda and Venice's victory, plus Miranda's, and the scope to use Crowd Justice to raise money, may well have encouraged settlements on other cases, which may have happened here.
I dunno. I'm quute old. I have been caught out too often making assumptions that have been wrong. Instead I am happy to sit back, note a couple of characters who are probably 'not my cup of tea', but be happy if they or others help shed light on the problems that Self ID would bring, and by doing so help women and girls.