This has made me so angry.
This is a perfect example of the problem with our perceptions of consent/sexual violence - although I know this wasn't "sexual violence", just violence starting off as a sort of friendly intimacy - but the end result is the same. It's always suggested that there was a line that the poor man didn't realise he was stepping over. Like the Belfast rape trial, she consented to a kiss with one man, therefore it's reasonable to assume she was happy to be gang-raped and have her insides torn. Because how were they supposed to know that that wasn't OK? It's such a fine line, isn't it, that how could a man ever know?
Here we have a hug. A hug is OK, lots of people hug. She didn't look like she had much choice about the hug, IMO, but she probably didn't really mind. But it wasn't a hug - it was, as it always is, a man displaying his power and aggression over a woman. She stopped feeling comfortable with the hug, then tried to escape. And then, since he doesn't care about whether she wants it, because it was never a "hug" in the first place - that was just the means used to get close enough in proximity to inflict violence upon her - she finds she can't get away and he strangles her.
And it's on CCTV, as clear as day to every single person who watches it. And yet, we still have the police and her bosses suggesting that this wasn't an act of pure violence?
Fuck this shit.