Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Nic Williams on Woman's Hour (Tuesday) talking about sport and gender identity

533 replies

OrchidInTheSun · 04/12/2018 06:00

twitter.com/fairplaywomen/status/1069731404488077318?s=21

Nic Williams will be debating with Beth Jones, who is an academic at Nottingham Trent www.ntu.ac.uk/staff-profiles/social-sciences/dr-beth-jones

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
Knicknackpaddyflak · 04/12/2018 17:11

Wow. Facts, evidence and different opinions threaten the living daylights out of some people, clearly from the deluge of reporting on this thread. All these deletions do is show how utterly silly it is to try and force this ideology on others. And how much it isn't working.

I do sympathise MNHQ, it is not actual MNetters who waste your time trying to thought police the whole world into obedience.

PositivelyPERF · 04/12/2018 17:17

I’ve reread your guidelines and STILL can’t see where I’ve broken them and there hasn’t been an email. I assume someone is reporting loads of posts in the hope of getting this thread deleted.

Wordthe · 04/12/2018 17:17

How can an academic come on that show and insinuate that it is women's fault they are not fast enough and they would have to try harder if they forced to compete with men
It made me think of the 'alternative facts' fiasco that we saw with Trump, I see Dr Beth as playing the role of press secretary here trying to defend the indefensible

Ihaventgottimeforthis · 04/12/2018 17:21

It's not solely about competitiveness either. It's about changing facilities too. So many grounds I have played at where the changing facilities are breezeblock huts in the middle of nowhere, with a row of open showers or going back even more, a big old shared bath (with a layer of mud at the bottom).
Providing adequate changing facilities for everybody is going to be a challenge.

PositivelyPERF · 04/12/2018 17:21

Got your email but still don’t agree that I’ve broken guildlines. It seems to be a matter of how my reports are ‘perceived’ by the moderator.

LangCleg · 04/12/2018 17:29

Not just terminology then. Hmm. Hope, MNHQ - you can't really be deleting posts on deliberately twisted interpretations just to placate people who can never be satiated. This is not the way to treat your community members.

I'll say it again: Freedom Programme training. You're abetting things you shouldn't be abetting.

Please think again.

Wordthe · 04/12/2018 17:30

this thing about them wanting to be called trans women rather than transwomen, what is that about?

LangCleg · 04/12/2018 17:32

this thing about them wanting to be called trans women rather than transwomen, what is that about?

They say the former is an adjective describing the noun that they are while the latter is a noun of itself, which is offensive and othering.

Another reason I object to any appropriation of the word woman.

Knicknackpaddyflak · 04/12/2018 17:36

It is also about coercive control of language to force a belief system on others whether they share it or not. With the aim that most people will innocently try to please without realising they have been compelled to validate a faith they may not with informed consent, have wished to. Like many parts of this ideology, it is slid in under the table with the hope that it's too embedded to argue with before anyone realises what is going on.

happydappy2 · 04/12/2018 17:37

Lets call them transexuals then....there is no LAW on this (yet)

VickyEadie · 04/12/2018 17:38

I remain astonished that a single person, much less a woman, actually believes that transwomen should be allowed to compete in women's sports.

PositivelyPERF · 04/12/2018 17:42

Lets call them transexuals then....there is no LAW on this (yet)

That would be an insult to actual transsexual people. I wouldn’t want to lump them in with MRAs, AGPs, cross dressers and men who claim to be women a couple of days a week, while using their male privilege for their own gain the rest of the week.

Wordthe · 04/12/2018 17:53

It is also about coercive control of language to force a belief system on others whether they share it or not. With the aim that most people will innocently try to please without realising they have been compelled to validate a faith they may not with informed consent, have wished to. Like many parts of this ideology, it is slid in under the table with the hope that it's too embedded to argue with before anyone realises what is going on

Hear hear, this is important stuff, and lots of people will think, whats in a name, whats in a word etc, BUT the power to decide who and what belongs in what category should not be underestimated!

indieshuffle · 04/12/2018 18:01

I do think that transsexual makes people think that people have had genital operations, when we know this is not necessarily the case at all.

So much obscuring of facts and realities, and claims of transphobia and triggering when women try to clarify the situation. Just wrong.

user1471451327 · 04/12/2018 18:07

I suspect you could use people who come under the protected characteristic of gender reassignment in the Equality Act as a legal coverall (though a bit of a palavar)

Terfing · 04/12/2018 18:13

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

theOtherPamAyres · 04/12/2018 18:13

"trans woman" is the preferred term of TRAs. For them, it's like "disabled woman" or "black woman" - a description of a particularly oppressed member of the female sex.

They view the term "transwoman" as a micro-aggression, implying a third 'other' class that isn't related to the female sex.

PositivelyPERF · 04/12/2018 18:19

Terfing That’s a banned term, so you’ll get deleted for that. It’s three strikes and your out. I’ve had my first on this thread.

The term cis is also banned, so you can’t describe someone as a cis man or woman. I assume that also means you can’t describe transwomen as none cis men.

PositivelyPERF · 04/12/2018 18:20

user1471451327 it’s just a teeny weeny bit long. 😁

Wordthe · 04/12/2018 18:21

This reply has been deleted

Post references deleted post. Talk Guidelines.

Terfing · 04/12/2018 18:21

@PositivelyPERF

Oh no. I didn't realize that. I have just reported myself to avoid a strike, I hope!

PositivelyPERF · 04/12/2018 18:22

You should be ok, as you’ve reported yourself.

Biologifemini · 04/12/2018 18:24

Another university dropping down the league tables
I though psychology was more rigorous than this
Where are the biologists ??? Oh wait there isn’t a bloody discussion with them because there isn’t much to say: females are still female.

BabyItsAWildWorld · 04/12/2018 18:25

The fact a women can go on women's hour and claim, that there are no physical reasons for segregating women's and men's sports, should surely show everyone how clearly we have been duped into accepting the absurd.

The fact this duping has happened, that the absurd is accepted,
that MNHQ are still trying to police the criticism of the absurd, is truly a horrifying and incredible phenonmenon.

The fact this highly effective thought control has happened in a seemly open democratic society should make our blood run cold, and ceratinly makes me reflect on many historic events in a different way.

PencilsInSpace · 04/12/2018 18:26

Transcript part 1:

Jane Garvey: So then to the final in our many conversations, it seems like, over the last couple of weeks, about sex and gender, which as I've said previously is something that really interests some of you, though not all of you. But nevertheless, it's a conversation we feel is extremely important and we are happy to return to it for one final time today. Yesterday we discussed lesbians and transwomen and you can find all our other discussions, of course, from the programme via the BBC Sounds app.

Today, we've moved on to sport, and transwomen, obviously want to play alongside and compete against other women and many would say, why ever not? Trans athletes can compete against women at international level but are they inevitably at a natural physical advantage? We'll get the views of Dr Nicola Williams, who runs a campaign group called Fair Play For Women and has a professional background in biology and biochemistry. First, you're going to hear from Dr Beth Jones, who's based at Nottingham Trent University, and Beth has conducted research into sport and transgender health. Now, I talked to her yesterday, not because she wasn't willing to join in a discussion, but just because she didn't have the time, she just wasn't available this morning.

So I asked Beth about the rules set down by the International Olympic Committee ...

Beth Jones: So, for transwomen there's a requirement that they've been taking cross sex hormone treatment, so oestrogen treatment, to enable their levels to be what we see within the cisgender population, so among cisgender women.

JG: Just to be clear about what you mean by cisgender ...

BJ: So cisgender are people who are non-transgender, so that's people who are kind of satisfied, or don't question the gender that they were assigned at birth.

JG: So yup, without putting words into your mouth and for the benefit of our listeners, you're talking essentially about 99% of women.

BJ: I wouldn't know the exact percentage

JG: Well, it would be about that, wouldn't it? Most of us think of ourselves as women, rather than ciswomen.

BJ: I think there are a significant proportion of women who might identify as a woman, who may have been assigned a different gender and I wouldn't want to assign kind of a percentage to that, but at least the majority of our society, yes, would consider themselves as a cis woman.

JG: The impact then of that oestrogen treatment you mentioned on athletic performance, what do you think it's likely to be?

BJ: I'm not sure that there is any scientific evidence that shows that, you know, oestrogen or testosterone has an impact in transgender people on their athletic performance. You know, certainly women report that once they've been on oestrogen therapy they feel weaker, they run slower than perhaps they did before, but there's no kind of robust scientific evidence to say that either testosterone or oestrogen impacts directly on athletic performance.

JG: Let's talk about Rachel McKinnon. She's interesting, in October she won the first world title by a trans athlete in track cycling. So, there was some controversy about this. Rachel did say that actually she had an unhelpfully low level of testosterone, something that the rules had actually insisted upon, and she pointed to that, so what do you make of that?

BJ: I think it's difficult to say, as I've said, you know, there's no evidence, and what we do know is that every person's body makes and responds to testosterone very differently, so that might just be her personal experience of having her testosterone levels reduced, but objectively, we don't know if that is the case or not.

JG: If we accept then that we are all different as individuals, is it time just to get rid of female and male sports and classes?

BJ: In an ideal world I think, you know, that would be great, it would overcome a lot of these issues around gender and sport, but at the current time it's probably not feasible to do so, I mean, you know, in years to come that might be the case, but at least for here and now, that's not going to be something that we can implement straight away. But we have started to see, at lower level sport and physical activity, you know, that people do at the weekend for fun etc., we have started to see more mixed gendered sports teams and so on, and you can see the positive impacts that that does have, not only on trans people, but also on, you know, cis people as well, the general population.

JG: But at the much more sophisticated, professional level of sport, if that happened it would mean that, in team games for example, no woman would ever play hockey for Great Britain or England again.

BJ: Uhhhhm ... they may ...

JG: Well, they may not!

BJ: They may not, that is all in the future to be determined.

JG: But that's not ... that's not an ideal, is it? Certainly for feminists who believe very strongly in female sport and the importance of it. That would be a horrifying prospect.

BJ: I don't think just because we have mixed gendered hockey teams, for example, that would mean that women wouldn't play. It might mean actually, if women feel that they are in a mixed team, they may push themselves even more to achieve even more, to be on more of a comparative level to males. I don't think it necessarily means that women wouldn't be able to play ... at a competitive ...

JG: No, I mean they'd never be picked. I mean obviously it would be the duty of whoever picks the team to pick the best team and, to be brutal about it, that probably wouldn't feature any women.

BJ: But at the same time we don't know that, and it may, and that's what I'm saying, that you know, there is a bit of an argument academically that perhaps women kind of cap their capability, psychologically, because they're competing against other women, if they feel that they're then competing against other men, who - we take it in society that men perform better than women, then perhaps they would up their performance and be competing on more of that level. So we may see women picked for those teams.

JG: What about the fact that at the moment, I mean you may know more, I don't think - I can't think of any transmen competing in sports who would out-perform their, let's call them cis male counterparts? Are there any?

BJ: I'm not personally aware, but you have to be mindful that we see trans people every day, they're not kind of invisible people, but we don't always necessarily realise that, or people don't want to disclose that. So of course there may be high profile athletes who are trans but we are just not publicly aware of it, just as there may be trans people, you know, working in the same office that you work in and you may not realise that because that person may not choose to disclose that information.

JG: Yep, I suppose what I'm getting at is the fact that there is no doubt that some people very firmly would believe that transwomen pose a threat to women competing in sport, in terms of success. To put it bluntly, do you believe that trans male athletes, let's say, pose a threat to male athletes?

BJ: I don't think any trans person, regardless of whether they identify as male or female, pose a threat to their competitors ...

JG: But we know, based purely on fact, it is highly unlikely that a transman would go faster, or lift something heavier, than a man in a competitive arena.

BJ: You say as a fact, but the same applies as it does to transgender females, there is no evidence that has explored you know, in transmen, what it's like to undergo testosterone therapy, how that might implicate our athletic ability, and whether we do perform better or worse, in comparison to cis males.

JG: What about the ordinary population, those of us who occasionally do a bit of sport? Sport - participation in sport - is actually really important, whoever you are, whatever you are.

BJ: Yep, of course it is, and perhaps even more so for transgender people. Unfortunately, you know, because of the way society is, trans people tend to report quite high levels of mental health, so a lot of depression, high levels of anxiety, social anxiety, and we know from extensive research that has taken place with the general population that physical activity - sport, you know, sport participation, is a really good kind of treatment to alleviate poor mental health problems. So yeah, of course it can only be a positive thing to make physical activity in sport inclusive for transgender people.