Ok here is my letter to my MP feel free to copy and paste or adjust accordingly.
It was a pleasure to meet you recently. Thank you for you time listening to my explanation of why we need to think carefully about the impact of agreeing men can be women legally on the basis of their own preferences in all circumstances.
A debate on Proposals to allow self-identification of gender is scheduled for Wednesday 21 November 2018 at 9.30am. The Member leading the debate is David T C Davies MP.
Westminster Hall, Wednesday 21
November 2018, 9.30
As I mentioned at our meeting, during the recent GRA consultation "Women Ask Questions" commissioned privately crowd-funded research into gender identification with @PopulusPolls
In summary the overall responses are:
19% of people consider a person who was born male and has male genitalia but identifies as a woman to be a woman.
52% would consider this person to be a man.
20% don’t know, 7% consider this person to neither be a woman or a man and 3% prefer not to say.
The download link below is safe and I've attached a pdf of the file.
uploadfiles.io/wxbzm?fbclid=IwAR3AT8KFNAjN3hkNN2krFFg2wfNPvMOtjROR2IMW-u9XrVyxpE1QzvW5AfY
It goes on to ask about sports and prisons, as you will see support for males being given access to women prisoners and to ruin women's sports get lower as the questions become more specific. Interestingly men agree less that men are women for the purposes of sport. Clearly the opinion of men on whether male bodied people are women changes when fair play in sport, a subject which is important to them, comes in question, rather than simply the dignity and privacy of girls and women in changing and dressing rooms and other facilities.
fairplayforwomen.com/prison-data-confirmed/ This link will take you to research conducted on the impact to women in prisons when you give male sex offenders a human rights entitlement to access them when they are locked up.
I would also ask you to consider the position Labour will take on hospital same sex wards. We are in the position where the NHS now has to include any male who wants a space in a female ward, and the females in there are given absolutely no consideration, their consent to this invasion of their privacy and safety which same sex wards were intended for is set aside, and is now described as bigotry.
If you wish to understand more about the male sexual rights movement behind the change in policy happening in advance of any legislation for self identification of gender please listen to Professor Shelia Jeffreys explaining the movement behind it in this video. She has written for decades on this male activism.
Thanks again, I hope you will read and listen in the spirit this is intended. I'm rather fed up of women being assumed to be bigoted dinosaurs for focusing on the sex protection and safeguarding of women and children which we have in place and are discarding thoughtlessly, and shocked that the Labour Party seem to be setting aside any rational consideration of reality and sanctioning autogynaephillia as a definition of female and woman for all purposes.
Kind regards