Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

TalkRadio programme director on Posie’s projected dictionary definition

13 replies

Rumbledore · 10/11/2018 23:30

“Campaigner Posie Parker has projected the dictionary definition of 'woman' on to buildings in Leeds. Tell us whether you think a woman can ever be a man”

No replies yet...

twitter.com/denniemorris/status/1061338819193126912?s=21

Hmm can’t seem to do a click link

OP posts:
averylongtimeago · 10/11/2018 23:53

The link works just fine.
Good for her! I was wondering what she was up to.

Whatsnewpussyhat · 11/11/2018 00:11

Typical comments from the usual trans women who claim that the definition of woman is invalidating them.

They never give a shit that they are invalidating us by making the word woman completely fucking meaningless.

peanut2017 · 11/11/2018 00:20

Good for you Posie

SlowlyShrinking · 11/11/2018 01:15

The TRAs reduced to desperately playing the woman not the ball, I see

CuriousaboutSamphire · 11/11/2018 12:20

The thing is, the more they show those 'hateful' posts by Posie, the more you can only think, well, yeah! She has a point and she is entitled to express it...

... which is what she is still doing!

BeyondVicious · 11/11/2018 12:25

Any commenters that disagree have got me blocked - I can only see comments I agree with and not a single TWAW.

CuriousaboutSamphire · 11/11/2018 12:28

Beyond Does that mean that your Twitter feed shows you a sensible world where TWAW does not exist?

If so I may need to make myself a Twitter account Smile

BeyondVicious · 11/11/2018 12:33

... Grin

TalkRadio programme director on Posie’s projected dictionary definition
SolidarityGdansk · 11/11/2018 16:20

Well done Posie Flowers

PurpleOva · 11/11/2018 16:43

Are the tweets being shared as Posie tweets genuinely hers though? I am new to this, so don't know what her genuine twitter account was, but know there were, are, or can be fake accounts posting crap to discredit people.

Not that it matters to me if those were her own tweets. Just curious if anybody knows if they are genuine or fake? I'm sure the people posting them probably have the odd distasteful tweet in their timelines too.

CuriousaboutSamphire · 11/11/2018 16:56

They've been discussed on a few threads and I think they are yes. She has acknowledged some of them, she was angry and hit back harder and less sensibly than she might have. But, to be honest, who cares?

Very few people who do things the rest of us are too scared to do are thoroughly nice. They have to be more, erm, mercenary(?) than most in order to be as belligerent, as tenacious, as determined, creative and hard nosed as they are!

So I'll take a flawed Posie Parker, whose flaws consist of being less than nice occasionally, of being less than wholly PC, inclusive or restrained, not to mention patronising and smug (loved the look on her face when The Haddock tried and failed). I will thank her for being in the financial position she is in, so she can do what she does and for doing it for women like me, who may not yet have found the necessary back bone to join her publicly!

arranfan · 11/11/2018 17:00

Posie P's statement about those tweets:

www.theposieparker.com/statement-about-tweets-and-wpuk

oooompa · 11/11/2018 18:47

I think I'm blocked by quite a lot of TRAs (I find a lot of people I'm blocked by I've never seen or spoken to on Twitter, maybe I'm on a TERF list Grin)

The only post I can see saying TWAW is from Joss Prior. Joss is the person who peak transed me, I'll be forever grateful to her Thanks

New posts on this thread. Refresh page