Dr Adrian Harrop thread the fourth. "GMC do care & have taken it to the next level"

[R0wantrees]

(twitter account in screenshot apparently suspended from twitter following mass targetted reporting yesterday)

previous threads:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3354331-Dr-Adrian-Harrop-thread-the-third-yes-weve-edited-the-title

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3248676-dr-adrian-harrop-dr-misogyny-is-pursuing-another-woman

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3244781-dr-adrian-harrop-who-the-funk-does-he-think-he-is

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3399503-Adrian-Harrop-feeds-back-on-his-own-debate-on-Feedback

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3392510-Adrian-Harrop-also-chimes-in-on-Karen-White

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3408520-Cant-stop-laughing-at-Haddock

Gosh that Emily person ( who are they? ) seems rather full of themselves. Delusions of grandeur.

Is that the SAS/Navy seal/Mosad agent/FBI/CIA/MI5 person - licences to bullshit?

I think a bit of Lundy Bancroft is called for:

“An abuser can seem emotionally needy. You can get caught in a trap of catering to him, trying to fill a bottomless pit. But he’s not so much needy as entitled, so no matter how much you give him, it will never be enough. He will just keep coming up with more demands because he believes his needs are your responsibility, until you feel drained down to nothing.”
― Lundy Bancroft, Why Does He Do That?: Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling Men

“YOUR ABUSIVE PARTNER DOESN’T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH HIS ANGER; HE HAS A PROBLEM WITH YOUR ANGER.
One of the basic human rights he takes away from you is the right to be angry with him. No matter how badly he treats you, he believes that your voice shouldn’t rise and your blood shouldn’t boil. The privilege of rage is reserved for him alone. When your anger does jump out of you—as will happen to any abused woman from time to time—he is likely to try to jam it back down your throat as quickly as he can. Then he uses your anger against you to prove what an irrational person you are. Abuse can make you feel straitjacketed. You may develop physical or emotional reactions to swallowing your anger, such as depression, nightmares, emotional numbing, or eating and sleeping problems, which your partner may use as an excuse to belittle you further or make you feel crazy.”
― Lundy Bancroft, Why Does He Do That?: Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling Men

How they out themselves - a lot of Twitter is just one long narc rage

I'm guessing 'Emily' isn't the name h* mum gave h*? Just sounds a bit aggressive for a womanly person.

I'm proper shitting maself btw

I dunno, I’ve met some right rough wimmin (oh the shock 😱)

I reported some of the more violent and threatening tweets about eight hours ago. They're still up, of course. Bet if I'd called Emily their dead name I'd have been iced before lunch.

I'm hoping Adrain will join the Army Reserve. He'll then be able to team up with Emily and, both armed to the teeth, attempt to storm Mumsnet Towers.

They'll be scaling the ramparts and we'll all be swooping around on broomsticks and knocking them off balance

So, they don’t like the mention of a site that doxxes, so their reaction is to dox more people and possibly those that haven’t commented on the trans agenda? Makes sense..

Washing line OCD? I really need to check that out. I'm pretty regularly accused of being the washing line and dishwasher police. I hope there's a support group.

Actually stuff the support group I demand police form a dedicated squad. Begin home inspections immediately. This is a completely valid societal concern.

The responses to the threatening tweet to Glinner are a hoot.

As Margaret Atwood said: men are afraid women will laugh at them; women are afraid men will kill them. So appropriate for this situation.

I reported some of the more violent and threatening tweets about eight hours ago. They're still up, of course. Bet if I'd called Emily their dead name I'd have been iced before lunch.

That tells you a lot about who runs Twitter, doesn't it?

These are interesting. I am not a lawyer but I can't see how what Joani Walsh has tweeted is even close to a definition of blackmail and extortion.

He really is such a bell end.

Ha ha. What Joani did was pretty much exactly what Jack the cooking on a bootstrap person did to Katie Hopkins. As Hopkins would not make the donation to a specified charity, as no loss of earnings was proven, she was taken to court and in fact had to pay up. So it’s the thing to do on Twitter now. Ask for donations to charities ‘ or else’

Hang on, isn’t this exactly what the good doctor did to a poster on here?

HairyPotter

I was thinking the same! The wording sounds very familiar. I'm sure he said exactly the same to someone he was threatening.

HairyPotter I know I’ve seen an almost identical thing from a TRA but wasn’t sure if it was him.

Seriously, what would this loser do without all us old bags to stalk and harass? Flipping weirdo

Didn't Owen Jones do something similar? And Jeremy Corbyn? I'm sure Corbyn did... to some Tory MP.

I have to say I don't agree with it. Forcing people to 'give money' is extortion. Forcing them to give to an organisation against their beliefs and conscience is bullying. Well it's something stronger than bullying, but I'm not sure what the best word for it is. Coercive control?

It is like coercive control... but it’s interesring that when a case went all the way to court, the person who didn’t pay the ransom, got heavily financially affected. Not that I like her one bit.

Didn't Owen Jones do something similar?

He tried to do it to Jolyon Maugham QC over what he said was a libellous comment I think. JM called his bluff. I don't think anything necessarily came of it.

I notice that the person who identifies as a lawyer did not offer Fanny legal advice.

The čase that got to court was libel, KH could have avoided that but apologising and donating but what went to court was the libel