This recent case:
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/blindfold-sex-men-trick-dating-app-ana-duarte-xavier-straight-a8571076.html
(Sorry on phone and can’t remember how to do link)
this got me thinking about what would happen if people WERE legally allowed to self-identify. The perpetrator in this case could claim he IS a woman, surely? So he could argue there is no case to answer to. the victims in this case claim a crime has been committed because they were duped into believing it was a woman when actually it was a male ie with penis.
Woukd the GRA have any bearing on such a case, does anyone know?
I believe there was also a similar case with the opposite scenario. Ie blindfolded victim was female, perpetrator was also female but pretending to be male with strap-on.
Again, could these people claim they are not duping anyone if they themselves feel that they ARE their chosen gender, despite the biological evidence to the contrary ?