Hi, did anyone else notice this? The pool decided to edit Sophie walkers piece without her agreement to pretend she means something she didn’t. It’s on Twitter- dunno how to link thread sorry.
I'd like to raise an issue with this piece. In its conclusion I wrote: "Women must stand for women." This was changed by editors, without consultation with me, to "women and non-binary people must stand for women" on the grounds of inclusion. (more)
I think it’s outrageous. It’s massive editorial overstepping- to a leader of a political party no less- and it’s imposing and distorting an opinion that wasn’t being expressed. How can they get away with it? Gah.