Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Call for gender critical people in Cambridge, UK

281 replies

maniacmagpie · 24/09/2018 12:21

DISCLAIMER: am not a mum and am relatively young. Have lurked intermittently here and in other feminism spaces, largely interacting with other young people (student age). Due to my age, my main exposure to these issues is from the point of view of someone moving in young liberal spaces, and my call is phrased accordingly, rather than among adult women who have a more tangible experience of systematic sexism in society, medicine and life. PLEASE let me know if this not the appropriate place for this request, and I will step back.

This is a message that I have started to spread: I have not generally been a social person and so am finding it relatively difficult to get started on contacting people. If I can get in contact with other people who share my concerns in person that would be great: if not, I will do what I can.

"Hello.

I am a student at Cambridge University. I have been left-leaning my whole adult life. I have been supportive of trans rights for years. I have always believed, and continue to firmly believe, that discrimination on the basis of being trans is unacceptable; trans people should have access to the care that they need, and do not deserve to be treated as lesser people on the basis of who they are.

Despite this, I have become increasingly alarmed by the discourse surrounding trans activism. For many years I crushed my own thoughts about misogyny, my doubts about my own understanding of sexism, with the thoughts that I must not ‘get’ it as a ‘cis’ female. I believed - or rather, forced myself to believe, when I couldn’t truly believe - that trans people, and specifically trans women, completely understand what it means to be the gender they identify with.

I no longer believe this. Please, before you dismiss me as a bigot, hear me out.

I no longer believe womanhood is a mystical force that can be detached at will from the reality of the female body, I do not believe that femininity is the target of misogyny, because non-conforming women suffer still from misogyny. I do not believe that even trans men are able to escape all misogyny and their own socialisation by transitioning - they are still able to be, and indeed have been, targeted by sexual violence in a way that only male-bodied people can visit on female-bodied people - reproductive violence, that can result in pregnancy, and the associated policing of bodily autonomy that comes with that. I believe that trans women are the targets of misogyny when it is assumed they are female bodied, and homophobia and fear when they are assumed to be male. I do not believe that it is reasonable, or appropriate, to demand that natal women stop talking about reproductive violence due to this misdirected misogyny. I do not believe that this statement is transphobic.

I believe that transphobia - job discrimination, verbal abuse and violence - is unacceptable. However, I strongly disagree that certain actions that are labelled as transphobic among progressives, are transphobic at all. I believe, not only that homosexual men and women have every right to reject opposite-sexed people as sexual and romantic partners, but also that the demands circulated among many progressive forums are damaging to young people’s understanding of their sexuality. Specifically, the toxic combination of female socialisation, lack of resources for isolated girls, and pornsick fetishisation of lesbianism for the consumption of men makes lesbian youth vulnerable to manipulation and gaslighting from mainstream LGBT+ groups, illustrated by the horrific discourse about the ‘cotton ceiling’. Not wanting to sleep with someone is not violence. Inclusivity is not something that is expressed through access to your body. I do not believe that in normal conversation it is at all reasonable to demand that any person, trans or otherwise, talk about their genitals - but sexual relationships are another matter. Sexual relationships should only be engaged with by two willing and enthusiastic participants. Human sexuality is, and should be, exclusive and not a target for guilt-tripping.

I believe that specific difficulties are presented to trans people that they should have the resources to deal with and spaces to talk about. However, I also believe that specific difficulties are presented to female people on the basis of their bodies - and that discussion of these issues is not transphobia. Naming reproductive violence for what it is, campaigning for better understanding of female medical issues in the face of the huge male bias of modern medicine, and recognition of the economic and social penalties endured by female people specifically on the basis of being physically female and not due to an inner identity, is not transphobia.

Gender hurts. Gender is a system designed to trap and control female people from birth through childhood, adolescence, adulthood and old age, because of their reproductive capabilities. This system did not fall from the heavens; it was created by males, to benefit males. Women have always, and continue to, suffer under this system - our economic power restricted, our lives at the mercy of men, our bodies policed, our voices ignored - because we are female, because we are chattel, because of those who believe we are lesser. Gender is the reinforcement of sex stereotypes, that women have fought against and will continue to fight against, as long as it exists.

Many males suffer under this system - gender non-conforming males are at inordinate risk of violence, generally from other males - due to stepping out of line. Boys who show emotion are punished for it. Gender hurts - gender is not a fun hat to take on and off, gender kills boys and men for behaving the wrong way, and girls and women for both resisting and capitulating. Gender is not a fun toy to play with and to swap around. Gender is a system designed to break us down.

‘Pussy grabs back’ - women cry - because the President of the United States said ‘grab them by the pussy’. Not ‘grab them by the feminine essence’ or ‘grab them by the girl brain’ or ‘grab them by the emotional intelligence’. Grab them by the pussy. Grab this creature who exists for his consumption and pleasure, by the only thing that gives them value in his eyes. Focusing on this does not make women genital obsessed. Pointing out that this is the root of our oppression is not transmisogyny. Recognising that we are treated this way because of our bodies is not a statement that it is the most important aspect of our selves, but a declaration that we are more than our bodies - and that we must be able to name the problem in order to combat the problem. Saying ‘this pussy grabs back’ is not transphobia. Recognising the extreme sexism of powerful men is not transphobia.

I retain a deep sympathy for those who suffer with dysphoria and deal with it in the best way they can. My stance on trans identities is roughly that of a medicalist. I believe that trans people are fully deserving of respect, the same rights as every other person, and freedom from discrimination. I believe that what is being asked, by certain noisy factions of trans rights extremists, is not a call for respect but rather a call for excessive privileges at the expense largely of natal females, and a targeted bullying of lesbian females and homosexual males. I do not believe that it is transphobic to point this out.

I do not believe in brain sex, but even if I did I think it is irrelevant - if you carved open a woman to find a clearly, obviously male brain with MAN branded in big blue letters, she would still have suffered sexism based on her body. To those who believe this to be true, that they are ‘born in the wrong body’ and the only way to alleviate this is transition, I respect your autonomy and your right to live as you feel best, but must say this: sexism visited on a man in a woman’s body is no worse than sexism visited on a woman in a woman’s body. Sexism hurts ‘cis’ women as much as it hurts female-bodied people who identify otherwise. I do not believe this is a transphobic thing to say.

I want to raise awareness and spark discussion in Cambridge, both in and outside the University. I want to discuss these issues, in light of the gender self-ID consultation, the silencing of A Women’s Place UK, the violence perpetrated upon women who speak out, and the vitriol being circulated against gender critics. I invite natal women, natal men, trans women, trans men, straight, bisexual, gay, lesbian, questioning, otherwise - anyone who wants to discuss, debate or just acknowledge this topic - to contact me. My wish is to provide a space to debate and discuss these topics outside the false dichotomy of the ‘conservative right’ and the ‘progressive left’. I want to reach out to the women suffering from misogyny, men suffering from enforcement of toxic masculinity, and trans, lesbian and gay people who are being failed by conservative families on the right and by ‘queer identity’ theorists on the left who describe their reality as transphobic, who feel silenced and unable to speak out without being branded as either morally disgusting or as bigots.

Please spread this. PM me. I want to talk. I’m reaching out. I will use the tag ‘gender hurts uk’ (on tumblr, where my blog is 'yourledgerisdripping'), or privately message those of you who reach out to me.

Gender hurts."

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
maniacmagpie · 28/09/2018 23:51

Hey gals,

I've decided on King's Parade. Should be a high traffic area with enough people around that I don't get dragged down an alley, and there should be porters at the gate. (All joking aside, I will be careful. Thank you all for your support.)

Other people have confirmed that my hat is indeed extremely pink.

Magpie

OP posts:
DorothyGarrod · 29/09/2018 00:02

Good luck, Magpie! I’m not in Cambridge this weekend otherwise I would have tried to pop by. The city is teeming with students and their parents this weekend so you will have lots of passing footfall!

shorthairdontcare · 29/09/2018 05:59

Hi, long time lurker on these boards but signed up to post - I am also a current Cambridge student who is becoming increasingly fed up with the lack of spaces available to discuss these sorts of issues in person, the only prominent feminist groups all seem to be of the CUSU 'let's educate the world on the real meaning of TERF' variety. If you are interested in perhaps starting a group of likeminded people who want to discuss real feminist issues and not just lady penises, please PM me (just joined, no idea how to contact you privately myself!).

If I see you around on King's Parade tomorrow, I'll stop and say hi :-)

NopeNi · 29/09/2018 18:40

How did it go OP? Hope you're okay

gendercritter · 29/09/2018 18:45

I do look back on this post with a lot of critiques (also some of the grammar would horrify my English teachers)

I type my posts here quite quickly and the number of times I've looked back and thought I come across as practically illiterate Grin.... I facepalm a lot.

If you're a clever female you are quite likely to be a perfectionist too, and that can hinder you. Don't stress it. You're doing something brave and lots of us are behind you.

maniacmagpie · 29/09/2018 19:11

Yo all,

I think it went pretty well. In the end I went with only

'acknowledging biological sex is NOT hate speech'

and got some very interesting responses.

A lot of people came up to ask me 'what's all this about?' which was what I hoped for because it does seem very strange to those not in the loop. One man asked if I blogged, I told him where to find this thread. He also asked for a picture of me and the sign. Apparently some american women (I did not interact with them, but somebody else was nearby telling them what I was on about) were excited by my very pink hat too. (I hate pink. I spent my whole childhood fighting pink. Apparently we all have our price.)

I also got, encouragingly, a lot of knowing nods and somebody gave me a thumbs up, which I'd also hoped for - I assume similarly frustrated that the 'woke' thing to do involves no ability to discuss the material conditions in which we live without being accused of 'creating a hostile environment'. I definitely got a bit of that 'thank fuck other people know it's not unreasonable to need to be able to describe things' kind of vibes, but it remains to be seen whether anyone decides to connect.

I'm hoping to repeat this next weekend. It's sort of my intention to be a regular fixture so that people can be like 'yeah I saw Pink Hat out and about again today, what do you think of that'?

Magpie

OP posts:
Lefthanddown · 29/09/2018 20:18

I admire your gumption, I know I couldn't do it without back up.

I'm glad it went well for you and you didn't face any hostility.

Was it predominantly men who approached you or women, or was there no clear distinction?

Socrates11 · 30/09/2018 08:09

Hi maniacmagpie glad you had a positive experience first time out. I'll be in Cambridge next Saturday for a couple of hours... do you think you will do roughly the same hours/place again? I will come and have a chat if that's the case.

maniacmagpie · 30/09/2018 18:46

To Lefthanddown:

"Was it predominantly men who approached you or women, or was there no clear distinction?"

I spoke to more men than women, but I had one-on-one conversations with very few people so would treat the split as a small sample size. They were primarily older people, but also some student age people.

The solidarity nods were generally from young people - students, and roughly evenly split between men and women. I didn't keep count.

To Socrates11 - yes, I'm planning a similar time next Saturday. I'll finalise the time slot here when I've sorted out my week, there are a few people on the thread who similarly weren't able to make it this Saturday who want to chat.

Magpie

OP posts:
maniacmagpie · 04/10/2018 10:22

Bumping the thread - still planning on Saturday 2pm to 5pm again, outside King's College. The sign is bigger, the hat is just as pink, and I am just as quaking in my (trainers) as ever.

I'll admit to having had nightmares about people putting up 'die cis scum' banners around my home, with the comic timing of being over the same night as the doxxing of Posie Parker (I haven't got much to say on that that hasn't already been said. Best wishes to her and just absolute scorn to the person who did it and for anyone who thinks that's a reasonable response to her statements. Even if someone thinks she's completely wrong they should be able to form a coherent counterargument without threatening her children!).

I'm absolutely not saying what I felt was the same thing, just that I'm mentally a little shook. But come on, really? I defend myself over who I am (who I materially and physically am, as in biologically female) on a daily basis. I won't deny it's tiring and stupid but I try to avoid attacking the person even when they're treating me like I'm idiot pond scum.

No ideology is immune to criticism and the assertion that any criticism is akin to an attack on people's rights and a call to hatred is frankly absurd. The fear tactics are ridiculous, particularly when juxtaposed with the common declaration that people with gender critical views want to deny people who call themselves trans basic rights or wish violence on them.

Modern gender ideology is just that - an ideology. It frustrates me no end that activists are using simultaneously the tactic of holding up the 'person who is born in the wrong body' and appealing to medical science to explain it whilst simultaneously rejecting medical gatekeeping as an affront to their dignity. It is one of the most bizarre things I've ever seen.

I personally can feel some sympathy for the 'born in the wrong body' view but I don't think that medical intervention, whether you believe it necessary or not, can change the sex. We do not tell a person who is born without fingers that the toes we graft onto their hands to increase their quality of life are exactly the same thing as fingers. We have made the intervention to increase their quality of life. That doesn't mean they weren't ever missing fingers. To me, the 'medical fixing of something gone wrong' is a non-argument for self-identification of gender trumping sex as a descriptor of who someone is.

I understand that many here don't view the 'born in the wrong body' picture favourably, but I'm not saying I necessarily agree with the picture - just saying that people should feel able to argue against gender ideology without getting wrapped up in a debate about dysphoria. I mean to say that perhaps people could find it useful as a starting point with others who worry deeply about offending a vulnerable minority. For some, if you dive straight to someone like Bunce they shut down with a No True Scotsman argument. Some people need to be led in baby steps ;)

Some are definitely receptive to the shock approach, but my personal experience is that a huge amount of cognitive dissonance can build up when sympathy is in play. I remember for myself some of the absolute bollocks I've put up with in the name of sympathy. People can really, really tolerate a lot - just look at all the lesbian women worrying about 'how to make myself be attracted to a penis'. I feel so so sorry for them - but that's the level that sympathy can push people to.

Come say hi if you like, or not if you don't feel in a position to do so. Photos welcomed (I apologise for the fact that it would have my face in it. That's enough to ruin any picture). Use me as a starting point for conversations with people who you think might be on the fence. I just want people to know we are out here, and we are resisting. We know it isn't wrong to speak up.

Magpie

OP posts:
maniacmagpie · 04/10/2018 10:39

Oh one thing I somehow didn't point out in all this, which was pointed out to me - there are usually other protesters on King's Parade and apparently some people couldn't find me.

I am wearing a pink PUSSY hat, and usually the rest of me is all in black or grey (I don't have an imaginative wardrobe). As stated above I made the sign bigger too. I must admit that the first time round I didn't quite have the eggs to be louder than I was.

OP posts:
maniacmagpie · 05/10/2018 17:23

I want to bump ukcamstudent's message - I've had a few private messages from people who might be more interested in group activism.

"Hi all,

I'm a gender critical PhD student at Cambridge. I've messaged the two users who posted above to say they were/will be students.

If any other Cambridge students see this page, please send me a private message. We've got big plans for the soon-to-start academic year and it would be great to get as many people involved as possible from the get go."

Do drop a line her way if you are in Cambridge if you're interested. I am by no means saying don't come to talk to me though!

Saturday 2pm to 5pm is still on, let's see what happens now that the students are back. Toodle-oo.

Magpie

OP posts:
Xenia · 05/10/2018 17:36

It's a good post. We need the universities to allow free thought and postings even of comments with which we disagree from all kinds of different people and if people need safe spaces perhaps they are not really robust enough to attend university at all.

ChoccyJules · 05/10/2018 17:40

I may be passing and if so will say hi Smile go you!

Socrates11 · 05/10/2018 18:28

It's supposed to pour down all day so take a brolly! Wink

maniacmagpie · 05/10/2018 18:44

Oh ratbags. That's not going to help at all. Thanks for the heads up, I'll tape the sign over with some cling film.

OP posts:
AnchorMum · 05/10/2018 20:52

Just have to say I greatly admire you for doing this. I hope your courageous actions gather pace and that you find yourself surrounded and supported by many likeminded others.

Good luck tomorrow and I look forward to hearing how you get on.

maniacmagpie · 06/10/2018 11:20

Yo gals,

I've been working on a summary of what the GRA consultation document and Stonewall are saying in their own words, which you can find at

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3386223-Self-ID-process-details-anyone-know

I have to say that at the time of the original post I had only just begun to reach out and was not aware of the exact content - I still thought that it was the (lack of) conversation that was the primary problem and didn't think what was being asked for could possibly be no checks at all, but realising that they really do seem to be pushing for self-ID made my blood run absolutely cold. I'd love suggestions for how/where else to spread the summary and it would be great if someone could help me put some time into formatting and check over that I haven't missed anything massive, that my cuts for brevity are reasonable, suggestions for how to make this more clear etc.

I have so far made a one-page PDF thing of the GRA reform consultation (relevant passages) and include the word online version so you can edit it/make it better and stuff. I'll be doing the same for the summaries on the linked thread too.

drive.google.com/open?id=1G2umQtLSxHUv1J6H3v2GebqFumIFOQw0

OP posts:
ChoccyJules · 06/10/2018 16:33

I couldn’t see you today, about 2.30pm, though it was pouring and I turned off just before King’s so didn’t walk all the way past. Hope your pink hat didn’t get soggy!

maniacmagpie · 06/10/2018 18:39

Heyhey duckies,

I am now as cold in my body as I am in my heart. Good grief. Today was very interesting. I talked to quite a few people, and again got quite a lot of people acknowledging me and giving the thumbs up. Got a few handshakes too.

I had a relatively long conversation with a woman who was still of the opinion that Get The L Out is a hate group (I suggested she have a look at the cotton ceiling stuff, but of course acknowledged that neither of us has a total view of what's going on), but overall we had a very respectful conversation about the reality of SRS and how it's really not fair to tell people that we have the medical science to change biological sex completely. I think our primary disagreement was who suffers more grief between lesbians and trans people, and we agreed that we could have a perfectly civil discussion using words that describe reality, without jumping on the other.

One group I got weird vibes from - we were talking a little and then they wandered off but I thought maybe they had somewhere to be. I think it was when I got to the point where I said 'medical science isn't good enough yet to change us completely over, so a transman is still biologically female but that isn't saying that I don't want them to live the best way for themselves'. I think maybe they agreed that it was a perfectly respectful thing to say and that I wasn't attacking anyone by saying that? I think someone yelled back 'yeah it's not hate speech'.

I had one guy walk past and say nothing but "prick".

I had one couple who gave me the full bingo: when I talked about how it was female people who were barred from Cambridge back in the day, they said that transwomen couldn't go to Cambridge either, then when I said but the world saw them as male so they would have been able to even if they didn't feel so inside they just said that male and female isn't real, it's a construct because intersex, the lot. When I asked if they could look me in the eye and say that they didn't know which one of their parents impregnated the other - however they identified and whether or not they are trans - they yelled at me some more, then walked away saying I was pathetic for spending my time on this. I mean at no point did I say transwomen weren't women now, just that they could have got away with it when Cambridge didn't want female women around distracting the serious menfolk. Somehow that wasn't enough.

A few older gentlemen talked to me about how it's ridiculous that in order to be a correctly thinking person it's about simply saying the correct things - very stimulating conversation. I did also have some great discussions about how hypocritical this whole mess is - we hear regularly that women are too dumb for science (see CERN dude in news recently - Prof. Alessandro Strumia), and then we get yelled at by people who think we're bigots for saying that he probably aimed that comment at female people rather than self-identifying women. Somehow the idea that any other group might have any problems ever passes them by.

Gawdess knows I defend women in STEM on a regular basis without resorting to name-calling. I won't deny that I get tired and angry sometimes, but come on. I can articulately argue that I think someone is wrong without yelling at them most of the time, I really can, and I can take a step back and own up to when I do go too far and apologise for mistakes I make.

Well oof. Eventful day. TTYL, gals.

OP posts:
NopeNi · 06/10/2018 18:58

Maniac, you're amazing. I mean that, I am reading in awe that you'd be that brave. Well done Thanks

Socrates11 · 06/10/2018 20:53

Really nice to meet you today Magpie, glad it went well and kudos for sticking at it in the cold, wind and rain.

I've messaged ukcamstudent.

Here's to the next real life encounter Grin

Fishywishyhead · 06/10/2018 21:23

I applaud your ovaries of steel! Next time you’re out I’ll make it my mission to come support you as a fellow Cantabrigian.

AnchorMum · 06/10/2018 21:40

Great to hear how you got on today - thank you so much for having the courage to get out
on the streets of Cambridge and have these conversations.

Women like you give me hope for the future of our world 💐

Manderleyagain · 06/10/2018 22:02

Well done and thank you. You make a huge number of excellent points.
The people who thought trans women would have been barred from university - it just goes to show how a-historical these beliefs are. The lack of understanding that it is female people who have been grossly disadvantaged not feminine people has been lost.
It might be worth you contacting the small number of out gc academics to see if they know of more like minded people in cambs to signpost to this thread.

Swipe left for the next trending thread