This is why I think y'all are over reacting a little on the transgender kids 'taking over' disabled toilets.
The point is that there is only a small number of children who are identifying as dysphoric and receiving medical treatment, yet anecdotal evidence so far is that schools are receiving regular requests that trans-identified children be able to access a sex segregated space that doesn't align to their natal sex. The two do not reconcile - which suggests that "feelings" (I feel like a boy/girl therefore I need to use their spaces) are being prioritised over "evidence" (I identify as a boy/girl and am receiving medical treatment to transition).
There is a greater likelihood of a school having a disabled child within its student body, than a trans child. - bear in mind my comments about not including children with ASD in the calculation, which would significantly inflate the percentage as it's common that many of them would need access to a disabled loo as well.
Therefore it would be inappropriate to prioritise a trans child over a disabled one; if schools are sufficiently concerned to want to make provision for trans children then they should be building third spaces for them.
It would appear therefore that there is a massive fear of upsetting a vocal and current movement, alongside a fear of being seen to discriminate against a minority group. Turning disabled loos into trans spaces is unfair unless the trans child is also disabled - as they don't need wheelchair space, grab rails, accessible basins etc. It feels very much like a quick and cheap win for schools but as a previous poster pointed out earlier in the thread, yet again it places disabled children at the bottom of the list.