Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Posie

999 replies

BabyItsAWildWorld · 30/05/2018 12:18

Where the fuck has the Posie thread gone and why??

So posie has views which have got her no platformed by WPUK.

and now MN will not let us discuss her no platforming???

WTF is happening?? How scary is this shit?

The reason I can see given is that the WPUK decision was not to do with MN.

99% of threads are about people/organsitions/decisions not to do with MN. That explanation makes no sense.

Did Posie ask for it to go?

I thought she was getting mostly support on there.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Pratchet · 01/06/2018 08:09

*I don't for a second believe posie made that video.

I do believe that TAs would do anything to smear her name.*

Me too. Without a doubt. This fight in the UK right now is absolutely crucial for transgenderism. There is nothing TRA won't do to discredit people who look like gaining influence. By trying to take down Posie, they also seek to take down Stephanie and Transgender Trends. All this talk about the 'effort' involved. TRA have unlimited funds and unlimited technical expertise.

RuthZ · 01/06/2018 08:10

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Janie143 · 01/06/2018 08:11

Click on ACCOUNT to see info Also if you click on the photo it is very poor quality like it's been sniped rather than an actual photo upload get.google.com/albumarchive/112321749500083156779/album/AF1QipO_awLf_k2vg16-4-LQWFJjuAd3H1ymE4WpQskR

Pratchet · 01/06/2018 08:12

Ruth: posie is not Islamophobic.

PeakPants · 01/06/2018 08:16

Ruth: posie is not Islamophobic.

Noooo, course not. Sorry but if you replaced 'Muslim' in her many tweet with 'Jew', you would 100% be accused of anti-semitism. Not a doubt about it. She's a Tommy Robinson supporter fgs.

Ereshkigal · 01/06/2018 08:20

Right out the Donald Trump playbook and just as believable.

Just like you, Ruth.

Is that the TRA troll klaxon I hear?

Pratchet · 01/06/2018 08:23

You do know that criticising Islam does not make one Islamophobic? One us still allowed to criticise Catholicism, Christianity and Islam, I believe?

This is a mega take down. It's deliberate, it's timed and it is absolutely the work of transactivists.

Ereshkigal · 01/06/2018 08:24

but I don't want to let the person who created this disgusting creepy homophobia off the hook so easily so I keep pressing the issue. Simple as that.

Righto.

LangCleg · 01/06/2018 08:24

3. The attitude of social services, who saw the young girls as exercising their right to be sexually active, wilfully blind to the grooming and abuse that was in front of them. Also fear of racism.

The attitude of group 3 is still central to choosy choicy liberal feminism, which reframes prostitution as "sex work" and dismisses the plight of girls from repressive cultures as not our business, even if they are living among us. It's dishonest and hypocritical and inconsistent. It might seem to be kinder but it actually causes great harm.

YY. This is where choice feminism gets us.

Pratchet · 01/06/2018 08:27

Of course many in the woke TRA side have no difficulty with criticising Judeism.

Ereshkigal · 01/06/2018 08:27

YY. This is where choice feminism gets us.

Absolutely.

ToeToToe · 01/06/2018 08:29

twitter.com/Transsomething/status/1002447964382683141

This person put it up on twitter 10 hours ago - but I don't know if that was the first posting.

This person is a transactivist who has been active on the mumsnet twitter timeline too.

There is nothing TAs won't do to hurt/damage gc feminists - gc feminists have been punched, doxxed, threatened, lost jobs/political positions, been reported to the police. Faking this YT video is a drop in the ocean.

therealposieparker · 01/06/2018 08:30

Someone has suggested the video and comments are old but the name and photo are recently changed.

RuthZ · 01/06/2018 08:31

Listen to yourselves. Yes, "trans activists" may have brought it to your attention, but all they did was a simple google search which anyone is capable of. All of this has now been brought to your attention numerous times.

Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull has even accepted herself in this thread that the account was created before she had made any name for herself opposing trans people. So this isn't the work of "trans activists" no matter how much you wish that to be the case.

There's only actually two possible explanations:

  1. Someone in Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull's life back in 2013 had serious issues with her and posted a weird homophobic video under her name but spelled with a slight variation.

or

  1. It is an old forgotten account and video created by Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull, who forgot that everything on the internet leaves a digital footprint.
Pratchet · 01/06/2018 08:32

Couldn't agree more, Toe. It's being made to seem as though it would be a huge effort, who would bother, technically impossible.

Posie had to be brought down. She's too appealing. MPs an councillors, serious people in serious places would have thought: Now here's someone we can listen to and deal with, a nice normal Mum, sort of person we could have over for supper'.

therealposieparker · 01/06/2018 08:34

Ruth.

I'm guessing you're really Brian or something.

No one who spells their name with an ie accidentally uses y... most of us are a bit weird about the y.

Pratchet · 01/06/2018 08:35

i haven't been at this long but I've discovered you cannot underestimate the TRAs' venom, vindictiveness, tech contacts, tech ability, time available to mass troll, willingness to mass troll, and connections to power.

Lifesavingorange · 01/06/2018 08:35

I’m sorry but Posie has brought herself down by tweeting things that mean people are disassociating themselves from her.

No smear campaign was needed.

therealposieparker · 01/06/2018 08:35

Why is anyone googling my name spelled wrong? Why would anyone think to do that?

Pratchet · 01/06/2018 08:36

No, she hasn't.

RuthZ · 01/06/2018 08:36

To go through this again for you @therealposieparker...

A YouTube account is linked to a Google+ account. This is how YouTube works as they are owned by Google.

When you go to the Google+ account linked to the YouTube account in question it shows a photo of you as the profile photo.

When you click on the 'i' of this image it shows a timestamp that shows the photo was uploaded on October 25th 2013 and a timestamp is not editable by the account holder - get.google.com/albumarchive/112321749500083156779/album/AF1QipO_awLf_k2vg16-4-LQWFJjuAd3H1ymE4WpQskR/AF1QipMawlhthKqYJbLaBxqQ9h9BXr2Nu3A0hFy_QAxg

So whoever did this did so in 2013. That's an indisputable fact.

OrchidInTheSun · 01/06/2018 08:38

People that start sentences with "I'm sorry but" never actually are sorry at all. And bringing it upon herself? Men never do that, only women.

Picassospaintbrush · 01/06/2018 08:38

Ruth

Are you working on getting the ducking stool ready?

ToeToToe · 01/06/2018 08:38

Somehow, as well as spelling her own name wrong, I don't think posie would have listed herself as male??

PeakPants · 01/06/2018 08:38

Posie, it comes up when you google your name spelled RIGHT. I did it because of this thread. Who knows why anyone else did it. Maybe you pissed someone off at school ages ago and they hold a grudge? I really don't think even an MRA with super-powers can go back to 2013 and create a fake account.

Swipe left for the next trending thread