Katya: It concerns me, that if Muslim women feel unable to access women only spaces for support then this further isolates then.
Indeed, this is a big problem. There is some support for Muslim women, but really limited to major cities.
malaguena: There is some tolerance with regards to "eunuchs" and feminine men but it doesn't make them women.
I half suspected that, to be honest. Seemed like the compromise situation of not tolerating gay men, 'insisting' they trans, then, what?
There is very little awareness of these issues in the Muslim community and yes, it might lead to further marginalisation of vulnerable women. I raised this issue on Twitter and was told I should stay home
This is an example of throwing a group of women 'under the bus' for male concerns. That is completely out of order to tell you to 'stay at home'. A number of critics have insisted that the radical feminists are 'scare mongering' when we say that all signs are pointing to a shift that women are being forced back into 'the private sphere' (code for: stay at home). And you have really provided an example that this is the sentiment.
Personally I am also uncomfortable with the idea that I would have to use my faith as an excuse to defend my need for single-sex spaces. All women should be entitled to privacy and dignity if needed.
It is not really limited to Muslim women, but Jewish women as well. And if I am to use the example from Australia, the Aboriginal women have specific women-only rituals, spaces, etc. (The Aboriginal men do too actually). So sex segregation is not unique, it is practiced in varying degrees across many cultures/religions. The Aboriginal example is cultural, not religious, but could be deemed 'spiritual'.
It is not that 'your faith' is being used as an excuse - it does effect many women beyond Islam. It is merely part, and I guess, more of a 'shorthand' used because it is quite an obvious one of sex segregation on religious grounds. It is also unfortunate, but the Equality Act seems to give more protection for religious beliefs, rather than the privacy/dignity of those 'merely born female'. So your final sentence 'All women should be entitled to privacy and dignity' is actually our main aim. The Muslim example is really just one of many scenarios - which also includes OB/GYN services, women-only refuges, the safety of women in prison - all of it.
Thank you for making your thoughts heard on this thread. It is important to hear from all groups of women affected by this ('stakeholders' in the lingo). Please don't feel you are being used - you are not - it affects so many women from so many backgrounds, situations, beliefs, and of course, female safety.