attacks on free speech
MN have been clear that although they support free speech, they don't support a free for all. I'm glad they won't stand by and see free speech be weaponised in the way that you and some others have attempted to do.
If a site of 12 million behaves as if 'misgendering' is already a crime, it becomes so much easier to argue that this is already social convention and may as well be codified into law,
Misgendering is oppressive and discriminatory and that is already social convention. It is already criminal behaviour.
UK Parliament Women and Equalities Committee 2015:
279.Further, under the Equality Act 2010, all organisations (including employers and public bodies, such as the NHS) must respect a trans person’s acquired / affirmed gender and any associated change of name. Failure to change pronouns, names and gender markers (including honorifics and pronouns) on records in respect of a trans person would (with a few exceptions)281 constitute unlawful direct discrimination under the Act.
280.Despite these clear legal principles governing records in respect of trans people, we heard significant evidence that trans people encounter problems with “misgendering” (failure to acknowledge a person’s acquired / affirmed gender) and “deadnaming” (failure to acknowledge a person’s change of name) in many situations.
publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201516/cmselect/cmwomeq/390/39009.htm
Equality and Human Rights Commission:
Harassment is when someone makes you feel humiliated, offended or degraded because you are transsexual.
For example a transsexual woman is having a drink in a pub with friends. The landlord keeps calling her ‘Sir’ and ‘he’ when serving drinks, despite her complaining about it.
Harassment can never be justified. However, if an organisation or employer can show it did everything it could to prevent people who work for it from behaving like that, you will not be able to make a claim for harassment against it, although you could make a claim against the harasser.