"It's ok to punch Nazis" becomes "It's ok to punch women"

[Freespeecher]

And lo, it came to pass that one of the (male) Bristol protesters has justified punching women who go against the Trans agenda (the same bloke who interrupted a Rees-Mogg speech and made him look a hero by saying he "wasn't worth" debating.

Please excuse the Guido article, but it at least shows that the Bristol aggression backfired as it's made some women MPs sit up.

order-order.com/2018/04/27/corbynista-mogg-thug-on-punching-women/

And finally, as a male poster, there's just time to sign off with the obligatory NAMALT!

It isn't of course Ok even to punch a Nazi, given that as their definition of Nazi will include the vast majority of the UK population. I will be a Nazi- I left the Labour Party and I read the Times.

From the comments on the Rees Mogg article.
Think AntiFa may have just made a huge mistake. Not only have they barged into a perfectly civilised debate screaming abuse with their faces covered, they've done it to arguably the most civilised man in politics - Das Moggster. People are going to look at the unwashed thugs in hoodies and look at JRM and are going to know immediately who's side to take. You don't even need to speak English to know who's in the right and whose side to take Appalling judgment, I mean most people know AntiFa are nastiness incarnate regardless, but this is like watching a guy chuck a bag of kittens in a canal and then asking if you have a minute to talk about the minimum wage. Just forget it. Absolutely no one wants to be associated with this kind of shit.

mobile.twitter.com/SatiriaNews/status/890933053165588480

Where is the party that cares about the vulnerable, uses evidence-based policy and stands for freedom of speech? I would dearly like to vote for them.

, I mean most people know AntiFa are nastiness incarnate regardless, but this is like watching a guy chuck a bag of kittens in a canal and then asking if you have a minute to talk about the minimum wage.

Lol

Economic Left/Right: -9.5
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.44

I think the only reason I'm not in the -9 range on social libertarian issues is that I have concerns about porn.

(Bloody political compass created by men)

Economic Left/Right: -7.5
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

I'm more moderate than AAK

Political compass. Fittingly I ended up sat next to Jeremy Corbyn...

Where was Corbyn?

Grimly amusing how authoritarian the Labour party as a whole are.

Does Corbyn ever seek to distance himself and the Labour Party from these thugs?

I don't think so Lass. They won't admit to misogyny in Labour.

Economic Left/Right: -6.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.36

Yeah the porn one buggered my results up too.

blimey i was almost in the bottom left corner (yes angry i bet the porn question nudged me up a bit too)

Here's the image...

has anyone filled this in hypothetically for anyone other than thatcher, hitler, stalin and gandhi?

X post changey?

Economic Left/Right: -8.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.56

I’m not as libertarian as I’d anticipated.

Economic Left/Right: -2.0
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.87

That puts me pretty near the centre, which is what I would expect.

Where is the party that cares about the vulnerable, uses evidence-based policy and stands for freedom of speech? I would dearly like to vote for them.

I'd sacrifice almost anything for one of those right now.

I haven't done it for ages but this is today's version:

Economic Left/Right: -9.0
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.51

has anyone filled this in hypothetically for anyone other than thatcher, hitler, stalin and gandhi?

If you go via the country links on the left, they've analysed quite a few elections, including US presidential elections which are obviously by person rather than party.

Economic Left right-3.13
Social libertarian/authoritarianism

that's probably right. As with others the porn question will have skewed it.

Ereshkigal

I don't think so Lass. They won't admit to misogyny in Labour

What is sad about your answer is that wasn't my question. I knew the answer to calling out misogyny would be no. I was actually wondering if he sought to distance himself from the attack on Rees-Mog or is he happy other parliamentarians can be attacked by thugs speaking in his name?

Economic Left/Right: -5.63 
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.15
Left Libertarian overall based on these questions. If other questions had come up I probably would have been less so.

What is sad about your answer is that wasn't my question. I knew the answer to calling out misogyny would be no. I was actually wondering if he sought to distance himself from the attack on Rees-Mog or is he happy other parliamentarians can be attacked by thugs speaking in his name?

Sorry, I misunderstood, based on the fact that the OP is about misogyny. No need to be sad about it. But no to your actual question too, AFAIK.

Where would someone who would thump a woman for talking about her rights sit?