Another great article in the Spectator about the role of MN in the TG debate
link
Including the following great paragraph (about the Maria Maclachlan case)
she was effectively instructed to say things in court that she did not believe were true.
I’ll repeat that. A woman who was assaulted by a person she considers to be male was told by the judge hearing the case to refer to that person as female – out of respect for her attacker’s feelings. That is the extent to which the enforced norms of the transgender debate can affect a person’s ability to express themselves as they wish.
Funny how the Spectator is turning into the new Guardian