Worryingly, concerns about the impact on women went unaddressed, and Gender Identity was left undefined. That was perhaps unsurprising as attempts by other jurisdictions to pin down Gender Identity have been less than satisfactory. For example, the State of Massachusetts defined it as: “a person’s gender-related identity, appearance or behavior, whether or not that gender-related identity or behavior is different from that traditionally associated with the person’s physiology or assigned sex at birth.” Which, to me, is a conflation of circular reasoning and sexist stereotyping.
Just wanted to say that I also very much like this paragraph from your article, Debbie.
Another MNer was making this vital point on another thread yesterday. How can good law be based on a term which has not been defined in an objective way that can be tested in the courts?