Not sure if this has been mentioned already, but the witness Dara Florence (who pretty much gave the reasonable doubt) and said she saw a threesome - she said 100% that she saw Jackson thrusting, and having sex.
Jackson says he didn't have sex with the woman.
So someone is lying.
Who the FUCK was this girls lawyer???????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I can only confess to being an avid viewer of The Good Wife and other crime dramas, and have limited knowledge by the google searches I do, but fucking hell, THAT IS A BIG INCONSISTENCY!!!!
Unless the lawyer did counter it, and no one listened anyway.
None of this makes sense. Jackson said that the woman willingly gave him a blow job, and then when he mate walked in, she beckoned him over and gave him a blow job (yeah, sounds like a fantasy doesn't it?) - then the woman proceeded to finger herself (more fantasy stuff) and that Jackson noticed she was bleeding and assumed she was on her period.
The doctor confirmed she was NOT on her period, and that she had internal injuries. What, caused by her own fingers?!
This is insane. This level of evidence. And all thrown away because Dara saw a 'threesome'. And her evidence contradicted Jacksons, but whatever.
The woman involved had inconsistencies apparently. Like not knowing which man was having sex with her because she couldn't see behind her.

