Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Royal College of Psychiatrists Statement

286 replies

dorade · 28/03/2018 10:51

What hope is there when respected scientific organisations uncritically adopt phrases like "sex assigned at birth" and use "two spirit" people as evidence for the need to mutilated bodies to a facsimile of the other sex?

Report here

OP posts:
spoonless · 02/04/2018 18:54

No.
Play the ball or not at all.

RatRolyPoly · 02/04/2018 19:11

Thanks spoonless, that's appreciated.

Lang, my experience is limited and in the area of PFI contacts. I'm confused that you think otherwise.

Ereshkigal so nice to see you again. I appreciate that this debate is a particularly emotional one for you. Obviously I'd prefer it if you didn't take that out on me, but as I'm not that only poster to have been on the receiving end at least I won't be taking it personally.

flowers I'm glad talking things over clarifies your position - I genuinely am - and I appreciate the opportunity in good spirit to interrogate my own position too. Like you I find it more often firms up my own arguments rather than changing my mind, but I'm not the sort of person who thinks we need all agree.

thebewilderness · 02/04/2018 19:14

I'm a newbie and I find @RatRolyPoly is measured, reasonable and refrains from personal attacks.

That is often the case with newbies, until they begin to recognize the pattern of behavior.

flowersonthepiano · 02/04/2018 19:16

fair enough rat it was meant as an observation, not a dig

RatRolyPoly · 02/04/2018 19:20

I got that flowers, no worries Smile

spoonless · 02/04/2018 19:34

That is often the case with newbies, until they begin to recognize the pattern of behavior.

Thanks, @thebewilderness, but this is not my first rodeo.

LangCleg · 02/04/2018 19:34

Lang, my experience is limited and in the area of PFI contacts. I'm confused that you think otherwise.

I said otherwise because you said:

I have a fair amount to do with legal writings as a matter of fact.

Obviously, voluminous was me taking the piss because I don't really think that someone with voluminous experience in writing legal text would see no problem with legislation protecting or criminalising a concept which had no definition of that concept. Because that would be very unlikely.

I think we both realise by now that we're unlikely to agree on much but at least we are helping people like flowers work out their own positions. It would be nice if you remembered what you'd said a page or so back though.

(Couldn't resist that last one. I will never get to heaven so just as well I don't believe in it!)

Ereshkigal · 02/04/2018 19:44

Ereshkigal so nice to see you again. I appreciate that this debate is a particularly emotional one for you.

Nice gaslighting attempt there. No surprise. We see you.

AngryAttackKittens · 03/04/2018 01:34

Silly wimminz always getting emotional about things!

Materialist · 03/04/2018 01:35

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Materialist · 03/04/2018 04:41

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread