I hadn't read the Transgender Denate that took place in the House of Commons last year until today:
hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-12-01/debates/D4F283FB-2C02-4C8C-8C7E-BEAB889D1425/TransgenderEquality
I think this excerpt sums up how ignorant confused the MPs that are pushing changes to the GRC are:
--
George Kerevan (East Lothian) (SNP)
Does my hon. Friend agree that the essence of today’s debate is that gender is a social construct, and that that should be recognised in law? It is not primarily a biological construct, but because the law is based on that outdated concept, it is failing us.
Angela Crawley
I thank my hon. Friend for that intervention. I reiterate that the law must be updated to recognise an individual’s gender identity, which has nothing to do with their birth gender and everything to do with the gender that they believe they are.
-
How can you say that gender is not primarily a biological construct and also agree that we have a 'birth gender'? It's one or the other surely?
If gender has got nothing to do with biology then why change your sex on your birth certificate? Why change your body? It makes no sense!