PrawnofthePatriachy This is a sample of a recent exchange with a particularly active individual - a conversation with several people:
SG Thank you all for your input. Allow me to clarify some points.
There is no denying that there are people who feel or wish they were the opposite gender than what they were born as. Such people exist and their concerns/conditions need to be addressed and treated. Additionally, there is no denying that some people have an actual genetic mutation which means they are not typical genetic males or females - however most transgender people do not fall into this category. These things being said, the question is HOW to treat these disorders. The answer to that must be arrived at via evidence-based medicine. Emotions, feelings, political correctness, etc. are not the determinants of medical diagnoses nor of the treatments for said diagnoses. Proper scientific research MUST be the source of our approach to treating these and any other disorders. Unfortunately, many have allowed their emotions to dictate their approach and others have been coerced by societal pressures. Gender disorders must be approached scientifically just as anything else in medicine.
JL how is sexual reassignment surgery and living as their preferred gender not evidence-based though?
The suicide risk in trans people decreases after transitioning and surgery often helps alleviate any dysphoria.
How does that not constitute as evidence?
JY And there we have it - the transition or suicide card - that is just so not good
JL gender is a social construct.
Sex is determined by biology, gender is an identity.
So I don't know why everyone keeps arguing that people can't be transgender when gender is not something palpable in the first place.
JY "So I don't know why everyone keeps arguing that people can't be transgender when gender is not something palpable in the first place." so if gender doesn't exist (isn't palpable) by your logic then transgender doesn't exist either - either way it is a circular argument