Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Can I ask you for some links about porn please?

479 replies

EhricLovesTeamQhuay · 20/10/2013 10:29

Specifically accounts of ex porn actors talking about abuse/coercion in porn films, and anything academic about the effects of porn on male sexuality and sexual attitudes?

I've read bits, but I'm already convinced. This is for a friend whose new boyfriend doesn't get it and she feels like she doesn't have the evidence to show him.
Thanks

OP posts:
paperlantern · 24/10/2013 17:33

yoni - really? intelligent input. Evidently you haven't read my posts

BuffytheAnyAppleFucker · 24/10/2013 17:37

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

SabrinaMulFUCKERJjones · 24/10/2013 17:38

Oh no.

Now it's questioning people's intelligence.

as well as de-railing, backpedalling and nitpicking.

Joy.

FloraFoxForAnyFucker · 24/10/2013 17:42

sorry for going back to an earlier point, but the "fact" that there are more search engine requests for "non hardcore porn" than hardcore porn does not in any way prove that it is only a minority of men who are looking for hardcore porn. The conclusion simply cannot be reached from the search engine statistics. It's another example of how the pro-porn lobbyists try to manipulate women into "expanding their boundaries".

FloraFoxForAnyFucker · 24/10/2013 17:44

Also, it's interesting how the pro-porn types are always going on about censorship. Why not have porn on CBeebies? What about beheadings, let's have some of those on tv.

paperlantern · 24/10/2013 17:47

sabrina - does that post contribute to the discussion one way or another?Hmm

yoni post was not a correct assumption and it said more about the poster than me, in my opinion posts based solely on self evidently false prejudice cannot be intelligent

paperlantern · 24/10/2013 17:48

flora - nor does it prove men do.

SabrinaMulFUCKERJjones · 24/10/2013 17:50

'Bout as much as yours did, paper... Grin

paperlantern · 24/10/2013 17:51

flora - you dont have porn on cbeebies for the same reason you don't have mickey mouse on the porn channel.

none would purchase it

paperlantern · 24/10/2013 17:52

sabrina - touche. the post annoyed me it was stupid assertion.

BuffytheAnyAppleFucker · 24/10/2013 17:53

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

BuffytheAnyAppleFucker · 24/10/2013 17:54

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

BuffytheAnyAppleFucker · 24/10/2013 17:54

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

paperlantern · 24/10/2013 17:54

sorry to clarify yoni 's post annoyed me. Yours was amusing because it was doing exactly what it was complaining about

SabrinaMulFUCKERJjones · 24/10/2013 17:55

Well quite, Flora. But, as someone on another thread very kindly mansplained to me recently, those examples are not censorship because they are illegal dear.

Ho ho. Love it.

Grennie · 24/10/2013 17:57

I do not want any porn. I don't think under patriarchy there is such a thing as feminist or ethical porn. All porn objectifies women and portrays a patriarchial view of sex.

And yes, we already have censorship. You can't show bestiality on ordinary TV channels. That is censorship. You have rules about what can be shown before and after 9pm on TV. That is censorship. You have film ratings saying what age of children can see it. That is censorship.

And I agree with this censorship.

YoniTime · 24/10/2013 17:59

So you didn't mean to compare ethical treatment of women in porn to free range eggs?
We just had a man compare buying women to buying beer on another thread. Thus my post.

paperlantern · 24/10/2013 18:01

greenie - actually I found out today that isn't what age restrictions do. they restrict who can purchase not who can comsume. even that is a social construct.

point is your post is your opinion. it is not mine. it can affect who you choose to interact with. (within the law) it can't and shouldn't dictate mine

Grennie · 24/10/2013 18:04

Yes he did just compare the two Yoni. He sees buying women the same as buying eggs. Says it all.

Paper that is disingenous. If you restrict who can buy a cinema ticket, you restrict who can watch the film in the cinema.

paperlantern · 24/10/2013 18:05

yoni - that is more intelligent input. thank you for rephrasing without the borderline personal attack on me.

but no if you read my thread I am not comparing porn to buying eggs. it was a way if explaining that the objection to porn raised was an argument against the production methods not consumption

paperlantern · 24/10/2013 18:06

greenie - who can purchase not who can watch the film in your own home

paperlantern · 24/10/2013 18:08

greenie - he? that was the prejudicial assumption I referred to earlier

Grennie · 24/10/2013 18:09

In your own home of course it can't be enforced in terms of DVDs. But responsible parents pay attention to age restrictions. But it si enforced in terms of what can be shown on ordinary TV.

But the point is we do have censorship already. If we didn't, you would be able to watch bestiality on ordinary TV. You can't, for very good reasons.

Grennie · 24/10/2013 18:10

paper - I thought you were a man? Are you not?

paperlantern · 24/10/2013 18:31

self censorship not state censorship. read my posts I'm all for self censorship.

as I've said before would it matter if I was a man or a woman? according to you I would still be comparing porn to buying eggs whether I was male or female Grin

Swipe left for the next trending thread