Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Have I read this 'story' right?? Please tell me I haven't.

271 replies

stretch · 13/07/2011 13:56

here

My first ever thread on Feminism, but I have no words... Shock

OP posts:
SinicalSal · 13/07/2011 16:52

Oh teen gangbangs in parks are totally normal you know Sunshine, I mean it's never happened to me but I've seen loads of films about it. Normal. Hmm

Jointhedotties · 13/07/2011 17:03

Because of course the people most accepting of gang rape, you know, those who actually DO it are almost all white, middle aged, middle class and public school educated .

AliceTwirled · 13/07/2011 17:05

Of course this is the same approach they use to people selling fags and booze to people underage. If they say, well I couldn't tell guv, then they're let off. Except no it isn't. Must be cos selling booze and fags underage is just way worse Hmm

malinois · 13/07/2011 17:14

Atomic I think three of them (four if you include the trial judge) have show they are pretty accepting of some working class black girls being raped in a park by some working class black boys.

'After all, they don't really know any better do they? It's not as if they are like us, they're barely better than animals aren't they? Do pass the sherry.'

Sorry, that was probably uncalled for but I'm feeling like I hate the establishment and class structure in this country at the moment. And I'm fucking part of it Angry

Jointhedotties · 13/07/2011 17:16

Who did the raping malinois?

SinicalSal · 13/07/2011 17:27

Judges are supposed to draw the lines in the sand aren't they Jointhedotties?

The judge here doesn't think it's a big deal?

Why, I wonder.

stretch · 13/07/2011 17:30

The 6 boys Jointhedotties Hmm

OP posts:
berkshirefem · 13/07/2011 17:46

Oh for fucks sake! Are we buying that they didn't know they were 12???!!! My step daughter is on facebook and lies about her age to boys (we are dealing with it!) one look at her friends shows them all in school uniform and whilst a couple of them look older, it's clear that they are at the eldest 13 or 14 because of the verying levels of puberty in the friends.
Also, in pictures of just a year or two ago, she looks like a baby - It's the same with all of her friends profiles as well.

These men may not have realised the girls were 12 exactly, bu tthey can't have gone to any lengths to find out how old they actually were and clearly didn't give a fuck. but why would they? Even though the girls were only 12, look what they got, a couple of months prison... hardly a lesson for other s is it?

But as someone said: who really cares about some working class black girls getting screwed in the park by some working class black boys...? This makes me so Angry Angry

berkshirefem · 13/07/2011 17:53

And this whole "I couldn't help myself gov, she seduced me" is so fucking Victorian it beggers belief that people are still wheeling it out and getting away with it.
12 year old girls being more sexually experienced than 6 grown men. I'm not one to judge a book but they hardly look as though their wet behind the ears!

JenaiMarrHePlaysGuitar · 13/07/2011 18:15

Sorry, I agree with lisad123.

The whole situation pretty grim but there certainly are 12yos who look 16. The girls instigated the situation. The men were bloody stupid.

They shouldn't get completely get away with this, but there are mitigating factors imo.

AyeRobot · 13/07/2011 18:45

What a mess.

I credit this case with helping me to really get to grips with the law regarding the age of consent and the SOA in general on this thread.

It is decisions like this where the "I thought she was 16" or "I thought she was consenting" part of a rapist's defence just demonstrates that there is not often much thought involved beyond sticking their cock in a woman.

stretch · 13/07/2011 19:35

Jenai In other circumstances I would say, "it's your opinion etc...luckily the law doesn't agree withyou" butbutbut not in this case! Angry It seems the law can change its' mind Confused Hmm

OP posts:
Jointhedotties · 13/07/2011 19:43

" But as someone said: who really cares about some working class black girls getting screwed in the park by some working class black boys...? This makes me so "

Well, their parents clearly didn't.

stretch · 13/07/2011 19:50

Why do you insist on blaming the parents?

From the other reports I've read, it's said that the girls were at a family party and snuck out, the mother phoned the police when she realised they were missing, then they found them at 2am-ish.

To be honest, your posts seem to suggest that it's everybody elses fault BUT the men. Angry

OP posts:
Jointhedotties · 13/07/2011 19:53

No, it was 100% the men's fault and they should b e locked up for a decent length of time, end of.

But the girls parents had a duty of care which they failed to exercise.

They had children who were sexually aware of not active at 12. They had children who were allowed to dress as more mature young women.

karmakameleon · 13/07/2011 19:55

Blaming the parents is just another variant of blaming the victim.

There are lots of good reasons for wanting your 12 year old daughter to come straight home after school (so she can get on with her homework, so you can sort out her tea and make sure she's had a decent meal), but the risk of her staying out shouldn't be that she is gang raped in the local park.

stretch · 13/07/2011 19:59

Yes, because the way you dress is equal to the likelihood of you being raped Hmm

So it wasn't "100% the men's fault" if you're attributing some of the blame to the parents (which was beyond their control so it would seem).

What is it? 80%-20%? 50-50?

OP posts:
AyeRobot · 13/07/2011 20:00

And the men had parents who brought them up to think that 6 men taking it in turns to fuck 2 girls (witnesses said that at least some of them thought they were 15) in a park was hunky dory.

SinicalSal · 13/07/2011 20:00

Maybe the parents are to blame. Did they hold a gun to the young men's heads threatening to shoot if they didn't rape?

Nagini · 13/07/2011 20:09

I am aghast.

This is why I don't read the papers. I can't take knowing about this stuff. :(

If they were 12. If you are stupid/ reckless/ sick enough to have sex with a 12 year old, then you suffer the legal consequences.

Except you don't. :(

I hope that the girls are getting the help they need to deal with this :(

KRIKRI · 13/07/2011 20:10

This decision is ghastly on so many levels, as many here have already said.

  • It shouldn't matter if a 12 year old child looks 20 or even 30, although that's not likely. In law, they are incapable of giving consent regardless of their appearance or behaviour. The point about the authorities having no sympathy for newsagents who sell alcohol or tobacco to under age kids because they "looked older" is relevant here. The onus is on the adult in both situations to ascertain whether the other person is old enough to legally engage in the activity. Whether it's sex, drinking or smoking, whether the child "wants" to do or is putting pressure on the adult, is totally immaterial.

  • I agree that if the children were boys in this case, the outcome would have been VERY different, imho ironically because of a nasty mixture of homophobia and sexism within the criminal justice system (sadly, reflected in society.)

  • The fast that most of the perpetrators and the victim were Black is I think significant - that "their" morals and behaviour are different - nasty again.

  • The reference to the children being "more sexually experienced than the boys" was totally non sequiter to the case. If a 12 year old child is "sexually experienced," that can only be as the result of previous sexual abuse, full stop. That abuse may have come from within the family or been partly sanctioned by the family, but quite possibly not. In any case, even if the family were complicit (and there is no indication that they were,) surely the criminal justice system has a responsibility to protect vulnerable children - which sexually abused 12 year olds by definition ARE.

Although it's not exactly the same, I'm reminded of the recent case of Hearts Footballer Craig Thompson who was caught engaging in classic "grooming" behaviour online with girls of 12 and 14 (whom he'd known in person since a much younger age) and the fact that his club and at least one high profile sports commentator effectively excused, or at least tried to diminish the gravity of his actions.

StayFrosty · 13/07/2011 20:14

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

PurpleStrawberryGuava · 13/07/2011 20:14

I'm appalled.

Law favours men.

stretch · 13/07/2011 20:18

KRIKRI great post.

OP posts:
Catitainahatita · 13/07/2011 20:19

I'm with KriKri. And also with those girls. I was abused from the age of 9 (and thus quite extensively sexually experienced by the time I was 12) without my family's complicity or knowledge. I find a more than a bit insulting that they should be blamed for it, especially as I went to great lengths to ensure that they shouldn't know about it.
I hope someone is looking after them and their families. Sad The whole looking for sex thing seems to be typical of abuse victims. In my case I waited until my twenties and was damn lucky that I had friends who looked after me and talked me out of it.