"Night wathc"

[LittleMouseWithCLogsOn]

is it supposed to be good cos i thought it wa crap

Do you mean the Sarah Waters book? I liked it.

I liked the Terry Pratchett one.

Crap?
Great read imo.
What didn't you like?

the charachters
all a cliche
relly liek cammomile lawny types
and all so unliekable adn silly

Aw, really?
I thought Kay was a great tragic character
Time + place so well done
Ace writing imo

bloody awful, couldn't finish it, really disappointing as I loved all her others especially affinity

don't tell anyone I posted here as I am supposed to have flounced, OK?

gosh I quite liked it too. I kept turning the pages to find out more about Duncan - thought he could have been much more of the focus tbh. haven't read any of her other stuff. felt teh descriptions of war-torn London were terrific, and the after-effects of the backstreet abortion were truly stomach-churning.

yes agree duncan was intersing

thought it was ok,nothing fantastic

thought it was ok,nothing fantastic

not doubel fantastic?

I've just started it and it hasn't yet impressed me even though I usually love anything to do with the 40s

has anyone heard the 'knight to king' theory?

fuck - wrong thrad sorry haha!

I was disappointed with it as I loved Fingersmith.
She is a great writer but I found the four storylines a bit frustrating.
I would have preferred if she'd concentrated on one or two characters in more detail.

i just finished readin this.
i thought it was good (though not as good as her others)
but i just feel unfulfilled! i want to know how they all get on.
maybe i should read it again. but backwards this time.

I thought it was all a bit predictable which made the tricksy backward storytelling technique a bit pointless. Cliched characters too.