Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

30 days only

School toilets

548 replies

Sweetheart1990 · Yesterday 12:05

School toilets!
Son text me to say he had walked out of lesson after being refused permission to go to the toilet, he had finished all his work. I have always told him to do this if he is desperate but he never actually has before.
He has been put in isolation.
I'm angry as I really believe that students should be allowed to go when they need to and he had completed all tasks so was just say in the classroom anyway.
What does everyone else think?

OP posts:
ClawsandEffect · Yesterday 13:17

AWeeCupOfTeaAndAnIndividualFruitTrifle · Yesterday 12:44

How ever did we get to the position whereby people are not allowed to access the roilet when they need it? Even prisoners who are jailed for the worst crimes possible are still entitled to go to the toilet when they need it.

Would people really rather children and teenagers wet and mess their pants in class? Really? Maybe they could add it in to the PSHE syllabus to make it clear to them that children and young people don't matter and are not worthy of basic human dignity.

And I'm also amazed on a site that is female dominated that people would completely dismiss as irrelevant the dignity of girls who are menstruating - especially those who will be of an age where they're still getting used to dealing with it having not long started.

Yes, kids often muck about and worse in toilets- but that is not the fault of the children who need to use the toilet. I'm sick of poorly-behaved children being 'dealt with' by punishing everybody. My teenage DS now has to go to reception and ask them to call me if he has an after-school club cancelled or similar, and we need to adjust our arrangements - just because of the children who can't keep off SM during classes... and meanwhile, the children who have caused the ban to be brought in are just more coy about it and don't actually care about sanctions if they are caught; effectively, the only ones who suffer are the well-behaved ones who keep to the rules.

Edited

Teachers aren't allowed to go for the vast majority of the day. From bus duty in the morning, to lessons back to back, break time duties, meetings at lunchtime, back to back lessons and then after school duties (bus, detentions, meetings). There are days when I don't have a chance to go to the loo between arriving at school and the end of the day.

Once when desperate, I nipped to the loo before breaktime duty and because I was late, was given a verbal warning.

I believe nurses have similar issues.

Whereas, students have chance to go to the loo at least hourly.

Changes26 · Yesterday 13:18

chickenss · Yesterday 12:18

He should be able to go when desperate. Schools must start using more commonsensical approach - of course, you can tell the difference between a student who has done his work and is desperate, and a student who would regularly take advantage.

I also think parents need to demand cleaner toilets at schools as many children are put off from using them (and drinking less/ no water) because of the state they are in.

Let’s prioritise our children’s health and stop making excuses for an underfunded system to which we have not much of a choice but to hand our children all day.

Totally agree.

Society complains about children not being toilet trained when they start school and then completely ignore toileting needs once they’re at school. Bladders and bowels don’t have schedules, particularly in younger children, children and young people with medical conditions and neurodivergent children and young people.

Toilet access and poor toilet conditions in schools are massive factors in bladder and bowel conditions in young people, particularly withholding and constipation.

I get that managing large classes is difficult, particularly in secondary schools. However, sometimes I think if we treated children and young people in schools with more dignity and respect we might find it doesn’t always lead to anticipated chaos.

Sweetheart1990 · Yesterday 13:20

Cosyblankets · Yesterday 13:16

Your OP says he has been put in isolation

Yes my mistake, I assume he has

OP posts:
ClawsandEffect · Yesterday 13:20

@quackers7 I appreciate teachers have a tough job policing this and that it is disruptive for kids to constantly be in and out of lessons for the toilet but I also think they should use their discretion and common sense. The alternative really is quite unthinkable.

We do of course. But also bear in mind, if that child we use our discretion for then floods the loos (blocking with loo paper), graffiti, faecal smearing, smoking, vaping, drinking, bullying others, WE are held responsible for letting them out. Betting our jobs on the honesty of teenagers (who, while we love working with them, can be absolute little whatsits at times).

Do you want to risk your job on the honesty/trustworthyness of a 15 year old?

quackers7 · Yesterday 13:20

ClawsandEffect · Yesterday 13:17

Teachers aren't allowed to go for the vast majority of the day. From bus duty in the morning, to lessons back to back, break time duties, meetings at lunchtime, back to back lessons and then after school duties (bus, detentions, meetings). There are days when I don't have a chance to go to the loo between arriving at school and the end of the day.

Once when desperate, I nipped to the loo before breaktime duty and because I was late, was given a verbal warning.

I believe nurses have similar issues.

Whereas, students have chance to go to the loo at least hourly.

Students are penalised if they are late too. My ds also says the toilets are full of kids vaping and being intimidating during actual breaks which makes them less likely to want to use them in the designated times. Maybe if schools focused on this sort of thing rather than archaic rules then they’d do better all round.

There will always be whataboutery in the sense that some jobs really do mean you can’t access a loo very often. But this isn’t the case here, it’s that the schools are refusing it.

quackers7 · Yesterday 13:22

ClawsandEffect · Yesterday 13:20

@quackers7 I appreciate teachers have a tough job policing this and that it is disruptive for kids to constantly be in and out of lessons for the toilet but I also think they should use their discretion and common sense. The alternative really is quite unthinkable.

We do of course. But also bear in mind, if that child we use our discretion for then floods the loos (blocking with loo paper), graffiti, faecal smearing, smoking, vaping, drinking, bullying others, WE are held responsible for letting them out. Betting our jobs on the honesty of teenagers (who, while we love working with them, can be absolute little whatsits at times).

Do you want to risk your job on the honesty/trustworthyness of a 15 year old?

No but I also wouldn’t want a 15 year old to soil themselves in my classroom. You’d be responsible for that too.

Samysungy · Yesterday 13:22

Sweetheart1990 · Yesterday 13:16

My son went to Holland with school last year, toilet on the coach, toilet on the ferry and was allowed access to toilet whenever they needed it throughout the day

Kids cannot use the toilet on the coach...they must wear their seatbelt at all times....

YabbaDabbaDooooo · Yesterday 13:22

Sweetheart1990 · Yesterday 13:20

Yes my mistake, I assume he has

Well you've been chatting away for almost an hour and a half, so why not ring the school again and ask for a very simple answer to your very simple question?

"Has my child been put in isolation, yes or no?"

Sweetheart1990 · Yesterday 13:22

quackers7 · Yesterday 13:17

In my workplace you’d leave at any time if you were desperate. Clearly it’s better if you can wait, not everyone can for various reasons. A choice between disrupting a lesson/meeting and causing myself severe discomfort and embarrassment is a no brainer imo.

I appreciate teachers have a tough job policing this and that it is disruptive for kids to constantly be in and out of lessons for the toilet but I also think they should use their discretion and common sense. The alternative really is quite unthinkable.

Op you’re not wrong to be pissed off. When schools ram home the importance of good attendance then place students in isolation for needing the toilet it really is quite disgraceful. In those circumstances I’d probably pick my kid up rather than have them pointlessly sit in isolation all day.

Edited

Thankyou, this is what I'm annoyed about, they are all for attendance etc and clearly only bothered about the numbers, because he's not in lessons if he's in isolation so missing out on actually learning. He may as well sit at home with the laptop as sit there.

OP posts:
ClawsandEffect · Yesterday 13:23

quackers7 · Yesterday 13:20

Students are penalised if they are late too. My ds also says the toilets are full of kids vaping and being intimidating during actual breaks which makes them less likely to want to use them in the designated times. Maybe if schools focused on this sort of thing rather than archaic rules then they’d do better all round.

There will always be whataboutery in the sense that some jobs really do mean you can’t access a loo very often. But this isn’t the case here, it’s that the schools are refusing it.

Schools stop lesson time use or the loos will be full of kids vaping and being intimidating without anyone to police them in lesson time (because the teachers are all in classrooms teaching).

This isn't new. It's been the case since I was at school.

Whitestick · Yesterday 13:23

We only have the student's word for it that he was desperate, rather than a bit bored.
How does a teacher know which of 30 teenagers are genuine and which trying it on? And how much time out of the lesson does this take?

BudgetBuster · Yesterday 13:23

Sweetheart1990 · Yesterday 13:07

Because the school was previously in the press for actually locking the toilet doors in lesson times, so I had the discussion with my son

How did that conversation go exactly? "Mum, the toilet doors are locked during lesson times"... "No problem, son. If you need to go, just go, get up and leave and break down the door if you have to"

🙄

Sweetheart1990 · Yesterday 13:23

YabbaDabbaDooooo · Yesterday 13:22

Well you've been chatting away for almost an hour and a half, so why not ring the school again and ask for a very simple answer to your very simple question?

"Has my child been put in isolation, yes or no?"

I have rung the school, no answer now, just leave message. If I don't hear back I. The next 10 mins I will be driving down

OP posts:
Gertrudetheadelie · Yesterday 13:24

quackers7 · Yesterday 13:22

No but I also wouldn’t want a 15 year old to soil themselves in my classroom. You’d be responsible for that too.

Unfortunately, in my career, I've seen a lot more vandalism/bad behaviour than I have soiled trousers. Statistically, it's just much more likely so that's what schools work with.

Lunde · Yesterday 13:26

imaccoffeeaddict · Yesterday 12:17

No, you wouldn’t.

You’d wait for an appropriate time because that’s how adults are. You can’t just allow him to believe he can disrupt people whenever he wants.

Sorry - what? Off course you just leave the room quietly. Not everyone can hold it for hours

Sweetheart1990 · Yesterday 13:27

BudgetBuster · Yesterday 13:23

How did that conversation go exactly? "Mum, the toilet doors are locked during lesson times"... "No problem, son. If you need to go, just go, get up and leave and break down the door if you have to"

🙄

No I saw it in the local news before he started that school, saw lots of comments from unhappy parents, I told my son if he is desperate, go.

OP posts:
BudgetBuster · Yesterday 13:27

Sweetheart1990 · Yesterday 13:27

No I saw it in the local news before he started that school, saw lots of comments from unhappy parents, I told my son if he is desperate, go.

But how if the doors are locked...
And if you don't agree with the school rules, why did you send him there?

HaudYerWheeshtYaWeeBellend · Yesterday 13:28

I had this with DS2 - I formally complained after they tried to give him a 1 day suspension for “ breaking” rules, - I advised their “rules” didn’t over rule Dfe policies.

I’ve edited this to remove ds details and personal information and amended for your child,

I cc’d in the safeguarding lead, governors and his head of year and head teacher.

Ds was issued with a toilet pass the next day.

Email sent.

I am very concerned about the incident in which my child was refused permission to use the toilet, became desperate, and felt they had no choice but to leave the classroom.

Issuing isolation for meeting a basic bodily need is not appropriate and raises concerns regarding safeguarding, duty of care and compliance with DfE behaviour guidance (2022)

Your behaviour policy state that sanctions must be fair and consider wellbeing. Denying a basic bodily need rarely fits within “reasonable discipline” by refusing my child basic toilet needs you caused my child
Schools must avoid causing unnecessary distress, physical discomfort and potential humiliation, which is in direct breach of your duty of care policy.

Your safeguarding and welfare policy also covers physical pain and discomfort, refusing him to use the toilet caused him to be in pain and physical discomfort to the point out of desperation he had to leave the classroom unauthorised, is a clear sign his welfare was not prioritised.

Sanctions must be reasonable, proportionate, and take into account a child’s age, needs, and wellbeing. Denying toilet access and then punishing the child does not meet this standard.

I am requesting an urgent review of this incident, removal of the isolation from my child’s record, and reassurance that my child will not be penalised for needing to use the bathroom in future.

Please confirm how the school intends to address this and what steps will be taken to prevent similar issues.

DaisyDooley · Yesterday 13:28

Wednesday505 · Yesterday 13:10

Of course, make humans don't need to use the toilet, even sometimes urgently, why turn this into another men are evil thread?

’Male humans’ who are at secondary school, unless they have any disability, are quite capable of using the loo before and after lessons and lasting an hour.
Female humans who have periods have menstruation made harder by lads dicking about.
I don’t know where you went to school but every school I have ever been in had a much higher proportion of the male humans Messing about than the females.
Nowhere have I said they are evil -that’s you who said that.
HTH.

Sweetheart1990 · Yesterday 13:29

BudgetBuster · Yesterday 13:27

But how if the doors are locked...
And if you don't agree with the school rules, why did you send him there?

The school had stopped this policy after the backlash so they aren't locked anymore. I was just explaining how I had come to have the conversation about leaving the room of you are desperate with my son originally

OP posts:
Miffyontour · Yesterday 13:30

imaccoffeeaddict · Yesterday 12:17

No, you wouldn’t.

You’d wait for an appropriate time because that’s how adults are. You can’t just allow him to believe he can disrupt people whenever he wants.

I've never had a job where I couldn't nip out to the loo, most adults can. I realise teachers are a bit screwed in this respect and that's not OK, I have taught, but HE, so it was never an issue.

Sweetheart1990 · Yesterday 13:30

HaudYerWheeshtYaWeeBellend · Yesterday 13:28

I had this with DS2 - I formally complained after they tried to give him a 1 day suspension for “ breaking” rules, - I advised their “rules” didn’t over rule Dfe policies.

I’ve edited this to remove ds details and personal information and amended for your child,

I cc’d in the safeguarding lead, governors and his head of year and head teacher.

Ds was issued with a toilet pass the next day.

Email sent.

I am very concerned about the incident in which my child was refused permission to use the toilet, became desperate, and felt they had no choice but to leave the classroom.

Issuing isolation for meeting a basic bodily need is not appropriate and raises concerns regarding safeguarding, duty of care and compliance with DfE behaviour guidance (2022)

Your behaviour policy state that sanctions must be fair and consider wellbeing. Denying a basic bodily need rarely fits within “reasonable discipline” by refusing my child basic toilet needs you caused my child
Schools must avoid causing unnecessary distress, physical discomfort and potential humiliation, which is in direct breach of your duty of care policy.

Your safeguarding and welfare policy also covers physical pain and discomfort, refusing him to use the toilet caused him to be in pain and physical discomfort to the point out of desperation he had to leave the classroom unauthorised, is a clear sign his welfare was not prioritised.

Sanctions must be reasonable, proportionate, and take into account a child’s age, needs, and wellbeing. Denying toilet access and then punishing the child does not meet this standard.

I am requesting an urgent review of this incident, removal of the isolation from my child’s record, and reassurance that my child will not be penalised for needing to use the bathroom in future.

Please confirm how the school intends to address this and what steps will be taken to prevent similar issues.

Thankyou

OP posts:
Loub1987 · Yesterday 13:30

imaccoffeeaddict · Yesterday 12:11

YABU.

If you’re at work in the middle of an important meeting you wouldn’t just walk out because you need the toilet. You need to be able to wait for an appropriate gap.

Of course I would, if I need to use the bathroom. I will do so. I will simply excuse myself from the meeting.

I think sometimes teachers seem to be on power trips. Possibly because many have never left education. School, University then teaching. Tough job though and many are doing a great job.

looselegs · Yesterday 13:30

My husband worked at a secondary school as a caretaker. During lessons was prime time for toilets to get vandalised. Kids would prime each other to leave lessons at a certain time, supposedly to go to the toilet...but they would meet up and literally wreck the toilets- boys and girls!
There weren't any teachers around because they were teaching.....
The damage was incredible...not just grafitti on the wall...
Smashed sinks and toilet pans, flooding- which caused nearby classrooms to have to close..holes in doors....not to mention them smoking in there...
It's the kids who are to blame for toilets being shut, not teachers...

Puffalicious · Yesterday 13:31

imaccoffeeaddict · Yesterday 12:11

YABU.

If you’re at work in the middle of an important meeting you wouldn’t just walk out because you need the toilet. You need to be able to wait for an appropriate gap.

I say this to pupils all the time: 'You don't see staff leaving a classroom to visit the toilet: we go before school, at break & lunch, even if that means we don't need at exactly that moment, the body will usually go'.

Exceptions are for those with a toilet pass, those that say they feel ill, or girls on their period (you can tell as it's quiet & polite requests). If it's unusual for a pupil/ a first request/ they really seem desperate I do give a toilet slip, but remind them it's not to be a habit. Our slips are collected & sorted every day so we can spot patterns.

I'm often in classes all day- 7 periods- so the only chance is at breaks. I understand if your DS has been ill (pupil support will issue a pass), has ASN (again, a pass), or had simply forgotten to go this once, but it's super disruptive as if one goes, it's a deluge of requests.