Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The staffroom

Whether you're a permanent teacher, supply teacher or student teacher, you'll find others in the same situation on our Staffroom forum.

UK schools could, and should, begin to reopen as soon as practicable after the initial wave of cases has passed through

253 replies

Otherrooms · 07/04/2020 08:35

www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-52180783

What do you make of this?

Schools could go back even whilst social distancing rules are still in place?

Have these people ever been in a school? School corridors/classrooms anyone?!

OP posts:
AlmostThereKeepMoving · 09/04/2020 17:51

@Piggywaspushed I don't know if that post was aimed at me, but what I have written is not "my interpretation," it is the Government guidelines which are available to all on the gov.uk website.

Pregnant women were and are included on the broader vulnerable group, more as a "rather safe than sorry" measure than the fact there is any research indicating that they are more vulnerable to caching Covid.

However, there is a subset of pregnant women who are extremely vulnerable and this is pregnant women who are significant heart disease, congenital or acquired. There were and are advised to shield for 12 weeks.

It was never announced that all pregnant women are "extremely vulnerable." Please do not spread things like this as it causes confusion, as can be seen on this thread.

Government guidance on who is extremely vulnerable and therefore require shielding for 12 weeks is here.

Government guidance on who is vulnerable is here.

Piggywaspushed · 09/04/2020 17:56

Here is the letter asking NHS staff to help them weave their way through the original wider list :

www.england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/wp-content/uploads/sites/52/2020/03/200321_COVID-19_CMO_MD_letter-to-GPs_FINAL_2.pdf

Do you not think my family have had extensive medical advice given my DH has a valve replacement? And that we, therefore, have been told by the heart consultant of his frustration over the shifting of the government definitions?

No desire to derail thread.

Piggywaspushed · 09/04/2020 17:58

It was never announced that all pregnant women are "extremely vulnerable." Please do not spread things like this as it causes confusion, as can be seen on this thread.

I never said that. I said there was an original lengthier list of vulnerable people. When that list was shrunk to provide the shielded group, many people did not realise they were, therefore, not at the highest level of vulnerability.

greathat · 09/04/2020 18:02

I've got an exam group heavy timetable this year. I was really looking forward to my "gained time" I had loads of stuff planned to do in it. Including working out better methods for the year 13 required practicals that didn't work properly. I'd like to be back June time... if it's safe!

greathat · 09/04/2020 18:03

Mind you the hospital has all the safety specs now so who knows when we'll be able to do practicals again

Piggywaspushed · 09/04/2020 18:14

This weblink also shows that there is a group (of heart patients specifically ) identified as 'particularly high risk'

www.bhf.org.uk/informationsupport/heart-matters-magazine/news/coronavirus-and-your-health

AlmostThereKeepMoving · 09/04/2020 18:16

@Piggywaspushed you did say it was announced that all pregnant women are extremely vulnerable, here: "Not all pregnant women etc are in that group despite being initially told (wrongly) they were." But they weren't told that initially. In fact, the list of who makes up the 1.5 million extremely vulnerable has not change. You can read the initial press release about it from the 21st March here. The list is the same as it is today.

It's really important that people who are concerned that they are in either the vulnerable or extremely vulnerable group access accurate advice from the Government website (links posted in my previous post) or from the NHS website.

As can be seen from this thread, some people have the wrong information, inaccurate information, or incorrect interpretations of the official advice.

Piggywaspushed · 09/04/2020 18:23

What I was trying to say was, at the point when schools were about a week pre closure , those staff were being treated as if they were 12 weekers ,and thought they would be and now aren't. This was before 21 March when anyone over 70 was also preparing not to see their families for a long time and believed they would be locked away. The government was slow to produce their actual shielded list. What I did not ever say was that app pregnant women were shielded.

The cynic in me thinks that that was an economic decision to get more of the nation back to work after lockdown but you are free to disagree on that.

Piggywaspushed · 09/04/2020 18:24

I didn't say told by the government. I understand why it would have been read that way, so apologies for that. Told by the media, various advisers, unions, and sometimes GPs/midwives etc.

Piggywaspushed · 09/04/2020 18:32

You actually only need to look at all the threads on shielding (like the one on RA now) to see how many grey areas there actually are. And it is the people on the grey bit who concern me in terms of any return to work in teaching or any other difficult to stringently social distance job post lockdown. I also worry for the shielded group after 12 weeks.

Davincitoad · 12/04/2020 10:23

These articles all read about the safety of the kids. They will be fine etc etc. None of them mention how keep staff safe??? It’s like we are an acceptable byproduct/ that lovely 2-4% extra deaths they mentioned.

thatone · 12/04/2020 15:28

I just think we are at a point now where it would be best to keep schools closed now until the end of the academic year and to plan how we can deliver remote learning to all children. I'm a little envious of how in America many districts have made this decision and teachers are concentrating on planning and teaching remotely. This also means we need to consider how to support less well-off families who don't have the technology of course but more than half the anxiety comes from all the uncertainty and the fears about putting ourselves, our own families and our students at risk.

elkobadelko · 30/04/2020 16:01

i'm so done with the closures. I feel like our reaction has been totally over the top. The numbers dying are tiny, even in places like sweden where they haven't locked down.
coronavirus is only the 4th largest cause of death at the moment, for example. my kids are way more likely to die in a crash on the motorway than by catching coronavirus at school.
reopen the schools!!!

pfrench · 30/04/2020 17:33

How would reopening work in the school you work at?

CarrieBlue · 30/04/2020 17:39

How does the likelihood of dying on a motorway increase with the number of journeys you make on a motorway? 🤔

likeafishneedsabike · 30/04/2020 18:51

A decision needs to be made. Either the govt needs to decide that we are closed until September, in which case we can focus energies on reaching the disadvantaged kids and delivering effective remote learning for all, or that we are going to open in some form for the summer term. A directive is essential and it should come a week today when the current lockdown period ends. Teachers and parents cannot continue in limbo: someone needs to have the balls to make a decision and to own it. We are not in the cloud of ignorance and fear that we were in 6 weeks ago, and there needs to be some leadership.

teqcar · 30/04/2020 18:54

i'm so done with the closures. I feel like our reaction has been totally over the top. The numbers dying are tiny,

Eh? Twenty six THOUSAND is not tiny.

PumpkinPie2016 · 30/04/2020 19:34

likeafish I agree with you. A decision needs to be made.

The limbo is making it harder for everyone. Personally, I think September would be best for reopening as normal. That way, whatever other social distancing measures can be continued until then and hopefully numbers can continue to fall.

Or, bring some year groups back (say 10 and 12 at secondary).

Either way, I hope a plan is announced next week.

pfrench · 30/04/2020 20:40

France have said no more than 15 children in a class, and voluntary sending back to school. Younger children first. Face coverings to be worn.

Not sure what that means for children still at home.

StaffAssociationRepresentative · 30/04/2020 20:44

What about the TES legionnaires story? That is something else schools need to sort out as well before we go back

#healthandsafety

StaffAssociationRepresentative · 30/04/2020 21:00

I would rather get the opinions of these two - chief medical officer Chris Whitty and Sir Patrick Vallance, the chief scientific adviser. Maybe they could join a MN debate

#solidarity

StaffAssociationRepresentative · 30/04/2020 21:58

www.tes.com/news/coronavirus-pm-plan-reopen-schools-will-be-set-out-next-week

StaffAssociationRepresentative · 30/04/2020 22:17

www.tes.com/news/williamson-rules-out-summer-holiday-school-opening

#solidarity #saveoursummers

pfrench · 01/05/2020 11:52

In terms of legionaires, staff in school have been running taps etc as they would during a holiday.

SpyApp · 01/05/2020 11:59

I think we'll open in a phased way after half term and close soon enough when there's another spike in cases. Then we'll stay closed till September. Who knows after that.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.

Swipe left for the next trending thread