Ham pr disasters 57! ….continuing the confusion and controversy….

[jeffgoldblum]

Once more into the breach dear friends!!

We get it, you think everyone posting is vile. So why are you still bothering to post? Or do you think you'll wear us down, one nauseating comment at a time?

He's been locked in a dungeon. It's the only way they can possibly silence that man!

So you're really Vera99? That explains so much!

I think she has made a right mess of it. Most spectacularly by her cognitive dissonance of saying she didn’t follow up with LE or speak out publicly because she believed it could compromise an investigation but then when it suited her in 2025 to write directly to the perpetrator and tell him what she knew giving him an opportunity to clear all evidence etc. So I see all of her actions as purely self serving. It suited her keep it quiet, it suited her to weaponise it in private to blackmail her DF, it suited her to jump on the bandwagon to say she already knew not for the victims but explicitly for her own PR around not seeing her father. All of this is proactive chaos.

However if the TMj story had just run and she was asked about what she knew and when it would be expected that she respond accurately rather than decline to comment (unless that was what she was ‘still’ be directed by the Met Police. So I would expect BP to provide accurate facts if asked rather than decline to comment which IMO looks shady given their very recent history of the handling of the AMW situation.

Careful!, someone will no doubt miss the humour and assume you are proposing violence!! 😱

It really is I killed vera99 at my own hands by deleting my account and then recently I acquired a new email account for business reasons and slinked back - I shall probably need to repeat that and leave you to it and make us all happy !

IMO, the only reason they would apologise is to get back under the Royal wing. HAM's "recollections " particularly Meg's are coming back to haunt them. She should have stayed quiet around all this

What about nils?

Or valery?

Like I say, some posters have an instantly recognisable style.

Maybe Harry is oblivious to everything?? On his medicinal mushrooms or whatever his therapy of choice is these days

😄

However if the TMj story had just run and she was asked about what she knew and when it would be expected that she respond accurately rather than decline to comment (unless that was what she was ‘still’ be directed by the Met Police. So I would expect BP to provide accurate facts if asked rather than decline to comment which IMO looks shady given their very recent history of the handling of the AMW situation.

You still don't seem to get that this is Meghan's problem. It concerned her family, the letter was sent to her, her security team was alerted.

It had and has nothing to do with BP, any more than the AMW situation had anything to do with Meghan.

"No comment" is the perfect response.

Yes I'm valeriy2 as well - but I had a NC for another board and it defaulted to that when I made a comment and you can't change it back within a thread. Nothing sinister just how it works now.Looks like I am being witch hunted !!

One thing that stands out is that HaM took a Freedom Flight to the USA.

While living there they had access to Governor Newsom, M cold called Senators, M visited former first lady and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, HaMs interacted with NYPD regarding their "near-catastrophic car chase," among other interactions.

And in none of these interactions did the HaMs inform US lawmakers, politicians or police of their suspicions about the activities of Markle Senior, a US citizen? Not even calling the FBI tip line?

Quite the choice, considering they felt free to screech endlessly about tights and lipgloss.

So you're posting under two handles? I thought that was against site rules.

What would Justine say?

IMHO, I suggest that we don't feed the trolls.

It is within a thread but not over the site. I doubt Justine cares - as long as the money rolls in she's probably quite content to leave us be. I did hear from somewhere she was bored of the site .No idea if that’s true but it's her milch cow for sure. The annual profit is around £3 million and she owns 60%.

MM made a statement on an issue that affects her family. She gave details (that she didn't have to) of an aspect of it that issue dating from the time when she was a working royal.

She put herself in the line of fire for questions on the matter.

If people want to ask the same questions of the RF, the fact that they have declined to comment indicates that they have nothing to say on the matter and so will say nothing. Least said, soonest mended and all that.

You got banned under Valerie99 didn't you?

Exactly & they had self styled themselves as humanitarian while sitting on this knowledge!
It looks terrible for Meghan.

That's the most astonishing reach at a derail I think I've ever seen.

Witches generally weren't burnt, BTW, they were hanged

https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/learn/histories/eight-witchcraft-myths/

No, I did not absolutely not. I was banned for a week under the username vera99, apologised to the very kind moderator, and learned my lesson. I had accused a certain member of this board of being a paid member of the Royal Household. That was out of order, I acknowledged it, apologised for it, and moved on. There is valeriy2 but no Valeriy99.

I’m going to give you some actual well meaning advice!
you need to stop….you disappeared last time because of questions about usernames which you actually admitted to then as well !
also it’s not a witch hunt when you yourself have shared the information.

To be fair, in my lurk days, vera99 still holds my trophy for the post that made me laugh the hardest.

I’m not sure it was intentional but I nearly had an episode.

So to yourself Vera…

It landed on MM's desk.

They can ask her what she did about it.

The fact that the RF is declining to comment rather indicates that they'd like to hear what she has to say on that matter, too.