Please or to access all these features

The royal family

H&M PR disasters 51 Advent calendars and engagements

82 replies

bluegreygreen · Yesterday 22:15

The continuing story of the Sussexes and their PR issues

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Mylovelygreendress · Yesterday 22:21

Thanks @bluegreygreen for the new thread .
Is it safe to come out ? Has the poster who was repeating over and over about Harry being Regent gone ??
I doubt Harry even knows the meaning of the word.

twosmallaxolotls · Yesterday 22:25

Evening, @bluegreygreen, and many thanks!

twosmallaxolotls · Yesterday 22:25

Mylovelygreendress · Yesterday 22:21

Thanks @bluegreygreen for the new thread .
Is it safe to come out ? Has the poster who was repeating over and over about Harry being Regent gone ??
I doubt Harry even knows the meaning of the word.

I hope nobody tells him.

twosmallaxolotls · Yesterday 22:26

Well, 'twas a very Royal day in Nottingham! What next?
Perhaps they could name a ship or open Parliament.

orthrywreeinvicedifthe · Yesterday 22:29

Mylovelygreendress · Yesterday 22:21

Thanks @bluegreygreen for the new thread .
Is it safe to come out ? Has the poster who was repeating over and over about Harry being Regent gone ??
I doubt Harry even knows the meaning of the word.

Why are you having such a strong reaction to me answering a question that was literally posed on the thread and answered incorrectly?

The question was asked regarding who would be Regent if George became King. Someone said the PoW. I knew that was wrong, so came onto the thread to explain that, as the law stands, it would be Harry. That is just the law. I offered no opinions regarding it.

Why has that upset everyone?

Starryfifty · Yesterday 22:36

Lauren the insider showed a clip of small kids in buggies screaming hysterically. It looked really uncomfortable

Mylovelygreendress · Yesterday 22:38

orthrywreeinvicedifthe · Yesterday 22:29

Why are you having such a strong reaction to me answering a question that was literally posed on the thread and answered incorrectly?

The question was asked regarding who would be Regent if George became King. Someone said the PoW. I knew that was wrong, so came onto the thread to explain that, as the law stands, it would be Harry. That is just the law. I offered no opinions regarding it.

Why has that upset everyone?

I lost count the number of times you insisted Harry would be Regent .
Once was enough .
PS H will never be Regent .

The End .

twosmallaxolotls · Yesterday 22:39

orthrywreeinvicedifthe · Yesterday 22:29

Why are you having such a strong reaction to me answering a question that was literally posed on the thread and answered incorrectly?

The question was asked regarding who would be Regent if George became King. Someone said the PoW. I knew that was wrong, so came onto the thread to explain that, as the law stands, it would be Harry. That is just the law. I offered no opinions regarding it.

Why has that upset everyone?

Look, just take the hint. Drop it.

chapstickandfibs · Yesterday 22:42

Candyman.

Starryfifty · Yesterday 22:45

Thanks for new thread BG ❤️

Starryfifty · Yesterday 22:47

Did HAM make a donation to these charities today ? And what commitment have they made to them for future endeavours ?

orthrywreeinvicedifthe · Yesterday 22:48

Mylovelygreendress · Yesterday 22:38

I lost count the number of times you insisted Harry would be Regent .
Once was enough .
PS H will never be Regent .

The End .

If George became King tonight he would automatically become Regent. Immediately. That is the law. I only repeated it in reply to others who came on to insist that this is somehow incorrect. It isnt.

He probably never will be Regent, because it is extremely unlikely that George will be a child king.

orthrywreeinvicedifthe · Yesterday 22:49

twosmallaxolotls · Yesterday 22:39

Look, just take the hint. Drop it.

Is the hint ‘we don’t want to deal in truth or facts?’

bluegreygreen · Yesterday 22:50

@orthrywreeinvicedifthe Some of us on the thread are capable of being even more pedantic than you.

None of us has an issue with the factual answer of how the law currently stands.

Several people were becoming frustrated with the perseveration about an extremely remote scenario that involved the death of two currently living people.

Please could we move on from the subject?

OP posts:
Kingsandqueenz · Yesterday 22:50

The last thread ran away & I couldn't catch up! Thanks for the new one!

twosmallaxolotls · Yesterday 22:53

bluegreygreen · Yesterday 22:50

@orthrywreeinvicedifthe Some of us on the thread are capable of being even more pedantic than you.

None of us has an issue with the factual answer of how the law currently stands.

Several people were becoming frustrated with the perseveration about an extremely remote scenario that involved the death of two currently living people.

Please could we move on from the subject?

👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

twosmallaxolotls · Yesterday 22:53

orthrywreeinvicedifthe · Yesterday 22:49

Is the hint ‘we don’t want to deal in truth or facts?’

Oh dear god

twosmallaxolotls · Yesterday 22:53

orthrywreeinvicedifthe · Yesterday 22:48

If George became King tonight he would automatically become Regent. Immediately. That is the law. I only repeated it in reply to others who came on to insist that this is somehow incorrect. It isnt.

He probably never will be Regent, because it is extremely unlikely that George will be a child king.

Just leave it, seriously.

orthrywreeinvicedifthe · Yesterday 22:54

twosmallaxolotls · Yesterday 22:53

Just leave it, seriously.

Why don’t you leave it? Seriously?

orthrywreeinvicedifthe · Yesterday 22:54

twosmallaxolotls · Yesterday 22:53

Just leave it, seriously.

Why don’t you leave it? Seriously?

biglyroyalistrepublican · Yesterday 22:54

bluegreygreen · Yesterday 22:50

@orthrywreeinvicedifthe Some of us on the thread are capable of being even more pedantic than you.

None of us has an issue with the factual answer of how the law currently stands.

Several people were becoming frustrated with the perseveration about an extremely remote scenario that involved the death of two currently living people.

Please could we move on from the subject?

It was brought up by the first poster on this thread. Why don't you tell them off for bringing it over from the previous thread?

twosmallaxolotls · Yesterday 22:55

Have H&M got any more plans in the next few days?

orthrywreeinvicedifthe · Yesterday 22:56

bluegreygreen · Yesterday 22:50

@orthrywreeinvicedifthe Some of us on the thread are capable of being even more pedantic than you.

None of us has an issue with the factual answer of how the law currently stands.

Several people were becoming frustrated with the perseveration about an extremely remote scenario that involved the death of two currently living people.

Please could we move on from the subject?

Many of you very definitely did have an issue with the factual answer and were insisting it was not true, patronising me by saying I must not be from the UK, etc.

I’m pleased that it has now sunk in though. I won’t ignore posts which reply to me in an insulting or rude way.

twosmallaxolotls · Yesterday 22:56

orthrywreeinvicedifthe · Yesterday 22:54

Why don’t you leave it? Seriously?

I'm not the one constantly talking about it.
You have been asked to cease and desist.

Swipe left for the next trending thread