Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Thoughts on the King and Prince of Wales tax disclosures

349 replies

Kirschcherries · 25/06/2026 23:24

According to the BBC KC and PW have released details of the tax they paid in the 2024-2025 Tax Year.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8x2151y8q4o

Apparently KC is in the Top 100 tax payers - The Sunday Times Rich List for 2025 placed him at 238.

I think it’s good they have done this and believe they are entitled to use the same legal tax avoidance measures everyone else can use. I don’t think we have a right to know every detail of their personal wealth but this is balanced against transparency regarding the Sovereign Grant and Duchies.

King Charles wears a morning suit and top hat at Royal Ascot

King Charles reveals he paid £12.9m in tax for 2024-25

The King becomes first monarch to publish their tax payments - with the figures putting him among the UK's top 100 taxpayers.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8x2151y8q4o

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
BrandiedAromatics · 26/06/2026 11:04

I note that the core part mentioned by @simpsonthecat has been increased including maintenance of occupied royal palaces. This is another important aspect that should be highlighted for tax payers to consider.

There are a number of non-working royals living in a luxurious central London location. Why should the tax payer be contributing to the maintenance of their living quarters?

Serenster · 26/06/2026 11:11

There are a number of non-working royals living in a luxurious central London location. Why should the tax payer be contributing to the maintenance of their living quarters?

In the same way that the Yeoman Warders and the Governor of the Tower of London have the maintenance of their living accomodation at the YTower of London paid for by the Royal Historic palaces charity. Maintenance of the fabric of the buildings is a legal obligation on the landlord (and the same for anyone who rents a property).

BrandiedAromatics · 26/06/2026 11:17

Serenster · 26/06/2026 11:11

There are a number of non-working royals living in a luxurious central London location. Why should the tax payer be contributing to the maintenance of their living quarters?

In the same way that the Yeoman Warders and the Governor of the Tower of London have the maintenance of their living accomodation at the YTower of London paid for by the Royal Historic palaces charity. Maintenance of the fabric of the buildings is a legal obligation on the landlord (and the same for anyone who rents a property).

This space could be used for staff, civil servants, diplomats or other accredited people that are making a contribution to the country. I do not see why the tax payer should subsidise the Michaels, Beatrice, Edoardo, Eugenie, Jack ...

JustAnotherWhinger · 26/06/2026 11:20

Kirschcherries · 26/06/2026 10:49

It’s not that hard for an accountant to do a self assessment return to establish the amount of tax that would be due. I wouldn’t be surprised if HMRC didn’t do a sense check.

I can pay tax online to HMRC by DD or Direct Payment via the website, I don’t see any reason why KC and PW, or the GMIS can’t do the same.

I was more wondering about the set up. Idle amusement wondering if, when she decided to start paying tax, they gave the Queen a National Insurance number and random things like that.

William presumably has one from his air ambulance job as that was paid work (even though he donated the salary) and from the military beforehand. Charles also from his military days, but QEII would have had no need for one prior to paying tax.

simpsonthecat · 26/06/2026 11:23

BrandiedAromatics · 26/06/2026 11:17

This space could be used for staff, civil servants, diplomats or other accredited people that are making a contribution to the country. I do not see why the tax payer should subsidise the Michaels, Beatrice, Edoardo, Eugenie, Jack ...

Totally agree

B&E non-working Royals yet doing very nicely thank you with central apartment and house
They wouldn't think to give it up voluntarily would they, oh no
All the Royals grab onto every benefit they possibly can and fight tooth and nail to keep it

JustAnotherWhinger · 26/06/2026 11:24

BrandiedAromatics · 26/06/2026 11:17

This space could be used for staff, civil servants, diplomats or other accredited people that are making a contribution to the country. I do not see why the tax payer should subsidise the Michaels, Beatrice, Edoardo, Eugenie, Jack ...

I think that’s one of the big changes the royals are going to have to get used to.

When the changes to the peppercorn rents happened and QEII took over paying the rents for the Michaels and others it was just accepted that she was paying from private income as it wasn’t something covered by the civil list.

Now people see more of the sovereign grant and it covering things like maintenance it’s a more obvious cost to the tax payer for those accommodations, even if the specific rent amounts still come from some private income.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 26/06/2026 11:36

Whatever your exact opinion there is a strong sense of lack of confidence in matters surrounding the royals

Yes, @BrandiedAromatics, and while any kind of transparency's better than none, thhe spinning we've seen over the years suggests thhere's a good reason for that lack of confidence

As PPs have said there's no detail at all, and speaking of detail does anyone know if the 2027/28 Sovereign Grant figures take account of the uplift for palace renovations, which I believe were said to end in 2027?

Kirschcherries · 26/06/2026 11:45

JustAnotherWhinger · 26/06/2026 11:20

I was more wondering about the set up. Idle amusement wondering if, when she decided to start paying tax, they gave the Queen a National Insurance number and random things like that.

William presumably has one from his air ambulance job as that was paid work (even though he donated the salary) and from the military beforehand. Charles also from his military days, but QEII would have had no need for one prior to paying tax.

That is an interesting point. NI No are issued automatically at 16 but it’s also straightforward to request an NI number if you move to the UK to live and work. Note:Evidence of identity etc. may not be straightforward.

OP posts:
bluegreygreen · 26/06/2026 11:47

LipglossAndLies · 26/06/2026 09:52

I pay a higher percentage of my income in tax than Prince William.

Based on the figures disclosed, he received £22.9 million from the Duchy of Cornwall in 2024–25 and paid £7.76 million in income and capital gains tax after deductions. That works out to an effective tax rate of around 34%.

We don't know the full breakdown between income tax and capital gains tax, or all the details behind the calculation, so the exact position isn't public. But based on the figures that have been disclosed, his effective rate appears to be lower than mine.

Hence why people say its opaque and not transparent enough. The figure £7m might look wow they pay alot but they don't relative to what they earn.

Same with Charles. His figure might put him in top 100 ut it doesn't mean he is apying his fair share.

I pay a higher percentage of my income in tax than Prince William.

Based on the figures disclosed, he received £22.9 million from the Duchy of Cornwall in 2024–25 and paid £7.76 million in income and capital gains tax after deductions. That works out to an effective tax rate of around 34%.

A couple of inaccurate assumptions in there.

First, the Duchy income covers the expenses of the Kensington Palace offices and staff, so only income after this is excluded is taxed.

Secondly, the Duke of Cornwall does not pay capital gains tax on income from the Duchy, as he does not benefit from capital sales (all profit from sales goes back into the Duchy), only the annual revenue. Capital gains tax will be on other personal income.

BrandiedAromatics · 26/06/2026 11:48

Puzzledandpissedoff · 26/06/2026 11:36

Whatever your exact opinion there is a strong sense of lack of confidence in matters surrounding the royals

Yes, @BrandiedAromatics, and while any kind of transparency's better than none, thhe spinning we've seen over the years suggests thhere's a good reason for that lack of confidence

As PPs have said there's no detail at all, and speaking of detail does anyone know if the 2027/28 Sovereign Grant figures take account of the uplift for palace renovations, which I believe were said to end in 2027?

There is more info in the 2nd BBC article, a pp posted, showing - the Royal Household receive £99.9m a year from 2027-2028. Three years ago, the figure was £51.8m.

The extra money will be used to pay for the upkeep of historic buildings, strengthen cyber security at royal residences and support the transition to green energy, with £11m earmarked to replace boilers at Windsor Castle.

EnterQueene · 26/06/2026 11:52

Meanwhile, the accounts show that the main source of annual public funding for the Royal Household - the core element of the Sovereign Grant - will nearly double within three years to just under £100m by 2027-28.

Why is my tax funding this talentless shower? At least Bezos set up a company and earned his vast wealth. At least people can choose whether to follow football and contribute to the Beckham coffers. I don't know why we have to pay for these accidents of birth - the Andrew debacle shows how our money may be used by these unscrupulous chancers.

Kadiofakit · 26/06/2026 12:00

A bit pointless really as we don't know how much he has! As pp have said, smoke and mirrors and good PR

simpsonthecat · 26/06/2026 12:02

Puzzledandpissedoff · 26/06/2026 11:36

Whatever your exact opinion there is a strong sense of lack of confidence in matters surrounding the royals

Yes, @BrandiedAromatics, and while any kind of transparency's better than none, thhe spinning we've seen over the years suggests thhere's a good reason for that lack of confidence

As PPs have said there's no detail at all, and speaking of detail does anyone know if the 2027/28 Sovereign Grant figures take account of the uplift for palace renovations, which I believe were said to end in 2027?

No uplift for BP in 27/28 but now fixed at 20.5% of CE Profits until 2032
A big uplift for them from 15%

GoneWithTHeWindJammers · 26/06/2026 12:03

It's the beginning of the end for the monarchy.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 26/06/2026 12:05

BrandiedAromatics · 26/06/2026 11:48

There is more info in the 2nd BBC article, a pp posted, showing - the Royal Household receive £99.9m a year from 2027-2028. Three years ago, the figure was £51.8m.

The extra money will be used to pay for the upkeep of historic buildings, strengthen cyber security at royal residences and support the transition to green energy, with £11m earmarked to replace boilers at Windsor Castle.

Thanks, BrandiedAromatics; I read that, but was thinking more of the very specific uplift which was granted for Buck House renovations and wondering what they'd do when the work was completed - especially in light of the Sovereign Grant being allowed to go up but never down

The article appears to suggest they've now created other things that uplift is "needed for", but I don't want to assume that without further information

And for all the talk about what's been paid in tax, it's worth remembering that all this is purely voluntary ...

No uplift for BP in 27/28 but now fixed at 20.5% of CE Profits until 2032
A big uplift for them from 15%

Edited to add I posted before seeing this, @simpsonthecat, and if it's correct the appropriate words seem to be "how convenient" Hmm

LipglossAndLies · 26/06/2026 12:27

bluegreygreen · 26/06/2026 11:47

I pay a higher percentage of my income in tax than Prince William.

Based on the figures disclosed, he received £22.9 million from the Duchy of Cornwall in 2024–25 and paid £7.76 million in income and capital gains tax after deductions. That works out to an effective tax rate of around 34%.

A couple of inaccurate assumptions in there.

First, the Duchy income covers the expenses of the Kensington Palace offices and staff, so only income after this is excluded is taxed.

Secondly, the Duke of Cornwall does not pay capital gains tax on income from the Duchy, as he does not benefit from capital sales (all profit from sales goes back into the Duchy), only the annual revenue. Capital gains tax will be on other personal income.

That's my point—we don't know, and that's exactly because they aren't fully transparent. I mentioned CGT because the £7.76m covers both income tax and capital gains tax, so it isn't simply tax on the Duchy income alone. That means we can't calculate his exact effective income tax rate from the Duchy. Even allowing for legitimate deductions such as staff costs and business expenses, the published figures suggest his overall effective tax rate is lower than many ordinary higher-rate taxpayers. Until they publish a full breakdown, we're left making informed assumptions rather than knowing the full picture.

But keep on defending them you are obviously a supporter and fan

bluegreygreen · 26/06/2026 12:33

No uplift for BP in 27/28 but now fixed at 20.5% of CE Profits until 2032

Presumably debated and passed by in Parliament, as is required for any increase in percentage by the Sovereign Grant Act?

bluegreygreen · 26/06/2026 12:38

LipglossAndLies · 26/06/2026 12:27

That's my point—we don't know, and that's exactly because they aren't fully transparent. I mentioned CGT because the £7.76m covers both income tax and capital gains tax, so it isn't simply tax on the Duchy income alone. That means we can't calculate his exact effective income tax rate from the Duchy. Even allowing for legitimate deductions such as staff costs and business expenses, the published figures suggest his overall effective tax rate is lower than many ordinary higher-rate taxpayers. Until they publish a full breakdown, we're left making informed assumptions rather than knowing the full picture.

But keep on defending them you are obviously a supporter and fan

The point is that you don't have the information, and you left out two large pieces of (known) information in your assumption.

You do not have the information to make the statement you did at the beginning of your post regarding the PoW'a rate of tax in relation to yours.

I'm not a fan of any one person, just of facts and accuracy, and detest deliberate misleading statements.

jeffgoldblum · 26/06/2026 12:54

We need more transparency on the royals finances! , do they pay tax ? How much ?

we receive some information

no not like that!! 🙄

Pedallleur · 26/06/2026 12:55

Slimtoddy · 26/06/2026 06:38

Do you think they have done it to kinda show that tax is a good thing and important for society to function?

Thanks to Andrew public scrutiny has increased and the baying mob needs something to keep them happy. The accounts will still be opaque and this information will be what is believed can be got away with

simpsonthecat · 26/06/2026 12:59

bluegreygreen · 26/06/2026 12:33

No uplift for BP in 27/28 but now fixed at 20.5% of CE Profits until 2032

Presumably debated and passed by in Parliament, as is required for any increase in percentage by the Sovereign Grant Act?

I have no idea and that doesn't make it alright anyway because the Royal Trustees defended it to the hilt.

The post 2027 core funding has risen dramatically and not just in line with inflation since 2012
The new sum is double the core grant of 2024/25

No one from the palace ever answers WHY?
No wonder Charles is putting out namby pamby statements of what he pays in tax to shut us all up

And yes, my only option is to write to my MP which I will be doing

simpsonthecat · 26/06/2026 13:00

jeffgoldblum · 26/06/2026 12:54

We need more transparency on the royals finances! , do they pay tax ? How much ?

we receive some information

no not like that!! 🙄

I would prefer an answer as to why the core part of the Sovereign Grant has doubled

ThatJadeLion · 26/06/2026 13:00

After Charles, get rid of the lot of them. Open the palaces for tourism.

APageInYourDiary · 26/06/2026 13:02

MrsLeonFarrell · 26/06/2026 07:09

Do they go to the family for their personal use or to the family to pay for maintenance and bills for Buckingham Palace the building? I don't know and I'm betting that it isn't clear.

This is why we really need clarity on royal finances, by which I mean the Sovereign Grant, Crown Estate and Royal Duchies, the way they are managed, whether the parameters under which they are administrated are still appropriate in the 21st century, who owns what and who oversees what etc It is really hard to have a proper discussion when things aren't clear.

I don't think the lack of clarity is deliberate so much as it is a result of decades of tweaking under different parties and in different times where society's expectations are concerned. It's complicated and complicated is hard for the press and social media, hence dramatic headlines and reductive articles.

The lack of clarity is absolutely deliberate! Don’t kid yourself it’s anything but 🙄

simpsonthecat · 26/06/2026 13:05

I just don't understand it. There are very very many people out there who haven't had a pay raise since before covid, and since covid everything has gone up massively
There are people who really struggle doing two or three jobs and yet this lot just take take take. They increase their wealth minute by minute and are given more from the Treasury rubber stamped by successive useless governments

They will be the architects of their own downfall through sheer greed

Swipe left for the next trending thread