Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

PR Disasters Chapter 14

1000 replies

Recklessismymiddlename · 22/05/2026 10:43

Continuing the baton on from @Atlusvue

OP posts:
Thread gallery
46
RecoIIectionsMayVary · 30/05/2026 11:00

jeffgoldblum · 30/05/2026 10:58

Does America know it has its own princess? , I mean they are a republican country that fought a war with us to rid themselves of such titles ! 🤷‍♀️

I'm also quite sure that she isn't Americas only Princess from a foreign royalty.

FenellaFeldman · 30/05/2026 11:03

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

Yes, and it's all in the public domain. The ONS records it as one of the rarest names. You can easily find the registration of this name, so it's very identifying.

jeffgoldblum · 30/05/2026 11:03

RecoIIectionsMayVary · 30/05/2026 11:00

I'm also quite sure that she isn't Americas only Princess from a foreign royalty.

No indeed not ! , I believe they have an additional two ?! One from Japan if I’m correct 🤔

jeffgoldblum · 30/05/2026 11:06

FenellaFeldman · 30/05/2026 11:03

Yes, and it's all in the public domain. The ONS records it as one of the rarest names. You can easily find the registration of this name, so it's very identifying.

i take this seriously @FenellaFeldman! , my dd has a very rare name that if it was mentioned on here would take no difficulty in tracking her down!! , although I never put my children on sm or allow pictures to be shared 🤷‍♀️

Puzzledandpissedoff · 30/05/2026 11:16

jeffgoldblum · 30/05/2026 11:03

No indeed not ! , I believe they have an additional two ?! One from Japan if I’m correct 🤔

I think the other one might have been Madeleine of Sweden, jeff, except I believe she's left now?

Mako of Japan's still there, living in Connecticut, but she renounced her title so doesn't go by "Princess" any more

FenellaFeldman · 30/05/2026 11:17

jeffgoldblum · 30/05/2026 11:06

i take this seriously @FenellaFeldman! , my dd has a very rare name that if it was mentioned on here would take no difficulty in tracking her down!! , although I never put my children on sm or allow pictures to be shared 🤷‍♀️

Good call. Even so, it's almost certainly not as rare as Lilibet. If you call your child what amounts to a unique name, but also linked to a late monarch and very particular, then you have to be extra careful.
You can have a look at the ONS and note how many girls were called Lilibet in the time frame given by that poster.
I'm not sure what the odds are, but my goodness you'd make a lot if you predicted those two girls would go to the same school! 😁

RecoIIectionsMayVary · 30/05/2026 11:29

FenellaFeldman · 30/05/2026 11:17

Good call. Even so, it's almost certainly not as rare as Lilibet. If you call your child what amounts to a unique name, but also linked to a late monarch and very particular, then you have to be extra careful.
You can have a look at the ONS and note how many girls were called Lilibet in the time frame given by that poster.
I'm not sure what the odds are, but my goodness you'd make a lot if you predicted those two girls would go to the same school! 😁

I don't agree. That's not how statistics work. I can well believe it is true.

It's like the statistic that if there are 25 people in a room then there is more than a 50% chance that someone will share a birthday.

And then there are social factors that increase the chance of a name being used. I can well believe it, but agree that that much detail shouldn't be shared on MN.

I read the name Lilibet but my head reads it wrong and it becomes quite unfortunate and not an nice thought.

hatorgal · 30/05/2026 11:31

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

Have you heard of the GDPR and Data protection Act ?

jeffgoldblum · 30/05/2026 11:32

Puzzledandpissedoff · 30/05/2026 11:16

I think the other one might have been Madeleine of Sweden, jeff, except I believe she's left now?

Mako of Japan's still there, living in Connecticut, but she renounced her title so doesn't go by "Princess" any more

Yes ! Well done that was exactly the two I was thinking of! 😁

jeffgoldblum · 30/05/2026 11:36

I’m also aghast that the poster felt inclined to include that one of the girls is “mixed race “ , I fail to see the relevance! And contrary to what has been hurled at the U.K. in allegations, not something that average people care about or take note of!

Recklessismymiddlename · 30/05/2026 11:37

@MyLeftSkiBoot id suggest asking MN to ask for your posts to be removed. Too identifying, but obviously up to you.

OP posts:
JudgeJ · 30/05/2026 12:06

RecoIIectionsMayVary · 29/05/2026 16:14

I have used it in real life. It is a great clap back.

So far, it's the phrase of the century in my opinion and so useful, wish it had been around when I was still at the chalk face and parents were lying about their monstrous off-spring's behaviour!, beats Right all the way.

MyLeftSkiBoot · 30/05/2026 12:08

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

Sigh, I have already changed few details (like not the exact ages or year groups) as well as name changed so it stays anonymous. I just thought it was an interesting detail to share, that is all. There are a lot of all girls grammars/schools in this country.

jeffgoldblum · 30/05/2026 12:13

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

JudgeJ · 30/05/2026 12:14

BasiliskStare · 29/05/2026 18:21

@Wordler "And if he’d had a shred of decency in him he’d have pointed out that the only reason his kids didn’t have Prince/Princess titles was because they were great grandchildren of the Queen."

Just so - even Harry couldn't have been so dim as to know what his children were entitled to at the time they were entitled to it. The pair of them were dreadful in that interview IMHO.

They then decided that once the Queen took her last breath that their children were now Prince and Princess and started to use the titles before aby official announcement. It would have been reasonable for the Palace to say that as they were not the grandchildren of the monarch at birth they were not entitled to be P and P. When George V drew up the rules I don't think that great grandchildren were envisaged, this situation is not addressed in the rules, everyone else kept their birth titles, eg Anne is not the current monarch's child or grandchild.

MyLeftSkiBoot · 30/05/2026 12:16

I will ask to remove it. I clearly read the room wrong as I thought it was just interesting detail. And surprised to see the name in the wild. I feel bit bruised after this experience but as I said, I clearly misjudged the situation.

MyLeftSkiBoot · 30/05/2026 12:17

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

I’m not a teacher to start with. As I said I will ask to remove the post.

jeffgoldblum · 30/05/2026 12:18

MyLeftSkiBoot · 30/05/2026 12:16

I will ask to remove it. I clearly read the room wrong as I thought it was just interesting detail. And surprised to see the name in the wild. I feel bit bruised after this experience but as I said, I clearly misjudged the situation.

Good ! Children should never be used or outed for entertainment!

hatorgal · 30/05/2026 12:18

Meghan showing a pic of how to light a candle with a match 😂 Does she think we don't know?

jeffgoldblum · 30/05/2026 12:21

hatorgal · 30/05/2026 12:18

Meghan showing a pic of how to light a candle with a match 😂 Does she think we don't know?

No doubt she invented a new elevated way of doing it! 😁

FenellaFeldman · 30/05/2026 12:22

jeffgoldblum · 30/05/2026 11:36

I’m also aghast that the poster felt inclined to include that one of the girls is “mixed race “ , I fail to see the relevance! And contrary to what has been hurled at the U.K. in allegations, not something that average people care about or take note of!

Yes, a strange detail

FenellaFeldman · 30/05/2026 12:24

RecoIIectionsMayVary · 30/05/2026 11:29

I don't agree. That's not how statistics work. I can well believe it is true.

It's like the statistic that if there are 25 people in a room then there is more than a 50% chance that someone will share a birthday.

And then there are social factors that increase the chance of a name being used. I can well believe it, but agree that that much detail shouldn't be shared on MN.

I read the name Lilibet but my head reads it wrong and it becomes quite unfortunate and not an nice thought.

I don't agree.
Have a look at how many girls were registered with the name Lilibet in the years the OP says.
It is very, very rare before 2021.

FenellaFeldman · 30/05/2026 12:25

hatorgal · 30/05/2026 11:31

Have you heard of the GDPR and Data protection Act ?

Good point

bluegreygreen · 30/05/2026 12:27

It might also be worth other posters asking to remove some of their posts that repeat the details in MyLeftSkiBoot's post.

(I don't mean the ones that quote it, as they will be automatically removed.)

jeffgoldblum · 30/05/2026 12:38

bluegreygreen · 30/05/2026 12:27

It might also be worth other posters asking to remove some of their posts that repeat the details in MyLeftSkiBoot's post.

(I don't mean the ones that quote it, as they will be automatically removed.)

Yes good idea I will do that!

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.