Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

PR Disasters- Part 9

725 replies

AtIusvue · 21/04/2026 15:31

PR disasters of Meghan and Harry.

Left off at the last page with Meg selling candles to people who want to know what her young children smell like. She’s also using the kids full titles in the press release….just for a dash of extra exploitation.

As you were

OP posts:
Thread gallery
51
LaurenBacal · Yesterday 10:08

Junippa · Yesterday 09:34

Absolutely - Meghan will hold all the cards in any custody battle, although of course it may never come to that. I'm sure she's very well aware of that, although he may not be.

I'm constantly amazed at just how dumb the man is, drugs or no drugs. He is (metaphorically) stumbling through life by ricocheting off the walls. Sometimes I idly wonder what on earth it can be like being married to someone that dumb, on a day to day basis. I mean, Meghan is not as bright as she seems to think, but still far brighter than him. I'm not sure that all the duchessing in the world could make up for it. But I guess she feels differently.

Ah but he’s a fox!

PoppysAunt · Yesterday 10:09

LaurenBacal · Yesterday 10:08

Ah but he’s a fox!

...one of those mangy ones you see round the back of the bins and that forage for left over kebabs.

Treylime · Yesterday 10:11

Any bets on where in the world he is going to pop up next? What will they announce during KCs visit?

Puzzledandpissedoff · Yesterday 10:14

LaurenBacal · 24/04/2026 22:53

Has no one noticed that he made a big thing of saying he had hated being a working Royal whilst doing the faux tour in Australia , but now, barely a week or two later, he says he loves to carry out his ‘work’ lecturing Trump and suchlike. He’s directly contradicting himself .

Yes, I mentioned it upthread, LaurenBacal

It's another contradiction to go with all the rest of course, but fits with Harry's ever-shifting "truth", and in the unlikely event he was ever challenged on it I'm sure it would be the media's fault for "twisting his words" or something

LaurenBacal · Yesterday 10:18

Puzzledandpissedoff · Yesterday 10:14

Yes, I mentioned it upthread, LaurenBacal

It's another contradiction to go with all the rest of course, but fits with Harry's ever-shifting "truth", and in the unlikely event he was ever challenged on it I'm sure it would be the media's fault for "twisting his words" or something

Ah sorry, I missed that.

Rincoe · Yesterday 10:45

MrsLeonFarrell · Yesterday 08:08

I don't think Charles needs to act. If other countries start giving Harry political recognition then the government should step in but at the moment I think this is a case of Harry trying to give himself a significance that he doesn't have. And I believe his anger is coming from a place of deep down knowing he doesn't have status anymore.

I agree. I don’t think to date any credible country / state has given him a platform / audience / reception - it’s been very obviously denied as per I would imagine quite stringent international diplomatic procedures and sensitivities being on play.

Its the rogue states and ‘bad actors’ that will exploit this ‘useful idiot’ at this level - and there are plenty of them - maybe PH is already in hoc to some?

StormGazing · Yesterday 10:48

LondonRidge · Yesterday 10:04

It also winds me up because he’s deliberately antagonising powerful people and then will use that to try and argue for more security at the tax payers expense. I can’t bear the man, he’s just awful.

This with bells on. He’s abusing his platform to grandstand and draw attention to himself and demand adoration for his useless, narcissistic wife because have nothing left and have failed at everything they’ve done.

But dangerously, he fully believes he was born to say and do whatever he wants, and that it’s other people’s responsibility to protect him from the consequences.

I really hope there are people reading this who can talk some sense into the situation.

Absolutely!

StormGazing · Yesterday 10:50

PoppysAunt · Yesterday 10:09

...one of those mangy ones you see round the back of the bins and that forage for left over kebabs.

Are you saying MM is like a left over kebab 😵 … 😉

PoppysAunt · Yesterday 10:51

StormGazing · Yesterday 10:50

Are you saying MM is like a left over kebab 😵 … 😉

😂😂
Certainly not!

Indianrollerbird · Yesterday 11:04

Treylime · Yesterday 10:11

Any bets on where in the world he is going to pop up next? What will they announce during KCs visit?

Rob Shuter, (I think he wrote the Vanity Fair piece on them) says they are planning an Africa tour.

RecoIIectionsMayVary · Yesterday 11:10

Its the rogue states and ‘bad actors’ that will exploit this ‘useful idiot’ at this level - and there are plenty of them - maybe PH is already in hoc to some?

Which is what AMW & SF became- and most likely their daughters.

We must learn from history.

(For those slow to understand, I am not saying the Sussexs are on par with the ex Yorks)

ShamedBySiri · Yesterday 11:15

Indianrollerbird · Yesterday 11:04

Rob Shuter, (I think he wrote the Vanity Fair piece on them) says they are planning an Africa tour.

He’ll probably pop up in Lesotho to set up Sentabale 2 and needle Sophie Chandauka. 🙄

Rincoe · Yesterday 11:20

LondonRidge · Yesterday 09:55

They are jokers trying to demand a place on a stage where they don’t belong. That’s why they get ridiculed. The last couple of weeks are classic examples of it.

They are also both completely delusional and live in an echo chamber determined by self adoration. Anyone who doesn’t conform is kicked to the kerb as a hater. It’s always other people who are the problem.

Both born to be adored. And rich.

But they do get their place on the stage because there are plenty of charities and organisations that are happy to provide a platform to achieve their own exposure goals despite the negative coverage of H&M - because the ‘noise’ will elevate the charity / organisations profile astronomically.

And this all gets covered due to the pantomime antics of H&M and the monumental click revenue opportunities for the media as everyone loves to ridicule the grandiose and delusional behaviour of these fools.

Both the platformers and the media benefit hugely financially but the net losers are H&M as they are the only ones unable to secure a revenue stream from this dynamic.

It must be absolutely galling and intolerable for them!!

The only cash they can secure is appearance / speaking fees and selling their associated online tat - but as the pantomime becomes more desperate, their reputational brand value declines and consequently their fees become less and opportunities less and less credible.

Its a deeply delicious narcissistic collapse of two nasty fools to watch in slow motion - I’m here with my popcorn for the whole 26 episodes - I would be gutted if the RF or UK government stepped in and pulled the plug on this entertainment.

Rincoe · Yesterday 11:26

RecoIIectionsMayVary · Yesterday 11:10

Its the rogue states and ‘bad actors’ that will exploit this ‘useful idiot’ at this level - and there are plenty of them - maybe PH is already in hoc to some?

Which is what AMW & SF became- and most likely their daughters.

We must learn from history.

(For those slow to understand, I am not saying the Sussexs are on par with the ex Yorks)

But it’s a different situation with H&M.

Why does it matter when two financially independent private individuals living in the US fuck up?

IMHO the UK government and BRF needed to be putting in more and more distance for when the inevitable shit hits the inevitable fan - they need not to be associated and stepping in now indicates some unnecessary accountability for them.

TheAutumnCrow · Yesterday 11:51

LondonRidge · Yesterday 10:04

It also winds me up because he’s deliberately antagonising powerful people and then will use that to try and argue for more security at the tax payers expense. I can’t bear the man, he’s just awful.

This with bells on. He’s abusing his platform to grandstand and draw attention to himself and demand adoration for his useless, narcissistic wife because have nothing left and have failed at everything they’ve done.

But dangerously, he fully believes he was born to say and do whatever he wants, and that it’s other people’s responsibility to protect him from the consequences.

I really hope there are people reading this who can talk some sense into the situation.

Yes, I agree.

What next? Harry weighing in on the Falklands while Meghan merches Yomper-inspired khaki goods?

Harry's views on the latest Hungarian elections and the impact on Ukraine and NATO? His opinions on the EU? His feelings that the inequities in Saudi Arabia have been exaggerated?

Maybe he'll start delighting us with his 'inside knowledge' of Charles's opinions and William's opinions, too, just before major events at which they are present as Head of State?

It's pathetic it's been allowed to drift for so long. He should be treated like David Icke, frankly, and quite openly so. The royal family can let it be known that door to the Priory will always be open for him, should he wish to avail himself of the opportunity.

(Edited for typo.)

bluegreygreen · Yesterday 11:51

But they do get their place on the stage because there are plenty of charities and organisations that are happy to provide a platform to achieve their own exposure goals despite the negative coverage of H&M - because the ‘noise’ will elevate the charity / organisations profile astronomically.

I do think they are reaching the point where charities at least will politely decline to be involved, as they will not wish to be associated with the notoriety that comes with the Sussexes.

Some reputable individuals and organisations will already be doing so (see for example the Irwins in Australia).

This will become more and more obvious. I think the RF are playing the long game - and not reacting to 'teenage tantrums', as described above.

Puzzledandpissedoff · Yesterday 12:08

Its the rogue states and ‘bad actors’ that will exploit this ‘useful idiot’ at this level - and there are plenty of them - maybe PH is already in hoc to some?

Indeed, Rincon

I hadn't realised until I read it on the "Australia" thread that Sooros has been involved in funding this latest farce, but Harry will almost certainly lack the sense to consider the issues there

Like the Yorks, if someone's prepared to pay for him that'll be good enough - and no, for the avoidance of doubt I'm not suggesting Harry's in the same bracket as them

Rincoe · Yesterday 12:09

Puzzledandpissedoff · Yesterday 10:14

Yes, I mentioned it upthread, LaurenBacal

It's another contradiction to go with all the rest of course, but fits with Harry's ever-shifting "truth", and in the unlikely event he was ever challenged on it I'm sure it would be the media's fault for "twisting his words" or something

But this isn’t what he said in Ukraine - his actual words were:

  • “I will always be part of the Royal Family”
  • He is “doing the things that I was born to do”

The first one is factually correct and the other is a statement about his perception and preferences around what he sees as his ‘sense of purpose’.

They were uttered separately and I think it’s the mischief media that have deliberately conflated the two to generate agitation, outrage and clicks.

Mylovelygreendress · Yesterday 12:13

Treylime · Yesterday 10:11

Any bets on where in the world he is going to pop up next? What will they announce during KCs visit?

I expect something today as Catherine is attending an Anzac event .

BemusedAmerican · Yesterday 12:25

American commenters have pointed out how much the US has spent on Ukraine, and suggested that Harry, whose visa is under scrutiny, shut his mouth.

Rincoe · Yesterday 12:27

bluegreygreen · Yesterday 11:51

But they do get their place on the stage because there are plenty of charities and organisations that are happy to provide a platform to achieve their own exposure goals despite the negative coverage of H&M - because the ‘noise’ will elevate the charity / organisations profile astronomically.

I do think they are reaching the point where charities at least will politely decline to be involved, as they will not wish to be associated with the notoriety that comes with the Sussexes.

Some reputable individuals and organisations will already be doing so (see for example the Irwins in Australia).

This will become more and more obvious. I think the RF are playing the long game - and not reacting to 'teenage tantrums', as described above.

100% agree.

Thats why I suggest everyone sits back and watch them erode to their natural end.

Why interrupt the already descending spiral and inadvertently add fuel that they would use to resurrect their victimhood?

Patience. And sit back enjoy the movie.

Puzzledandpissedoff · Yesterday 12:28

Rincoe · Yesterday 12:09

But this isn’t what he said in Ukraine - his actual words were:

  • “I will always be part of the Royal Family”
  • He is “doing the things that I was born to do”

The first one is factually correct and the other is a statement about his perception and preferences around what he sees as his ‘sense of purpose’.

They were uttered separately and I think it’s the mischief media that have deliberately conflated the two to generate agitation, outrage and clicks.

I'm aware the words were spoken separately, Rincon, and fully agree the media will make the most of whatever they can, but the overall sentiments still came from the same mind - or what passes for one - and reflect the playbook Harry's currently using

Basically he's having an extended tantrum and my only regret is that there are still some prepared to indulge him, even if most these days are "officials" and charities few have ever heard of

Why interrupt the already descending spiral and inadvertently add fuel that they would use to resurrect their victimhood?

Edited to add I thoroughly agree with this too, especially as there's clearly nobody Harry will now listen to - or at least nobody with sense

As I've said so often, once it's over it's over, and all that's left now is the spiralling into irrelevance

HoldMyWine · Yesterday 13:08

I think the fact that his recent ruminations in Ukraine have provoked responses from both Trump and Putin show what a loose cannon Harold is. Fortunately for us they find him amusing and have swatted him away like an annoying mosquito, he needs to be told to shut up.

corblimeygvnr · Yesterday 13:24

Rincoe · Yesterday 12:09

But this isn’t what he said in Ukraine - his actual words were:

  • “I will always be part of the Royal Family”
  • He is “doing the things that I was born to do”

The first one is factually correct and the other is a statement about his perception and preferences around what he sees as his ‘sense of purpose’.

They were uttered separately and I think it’s the mischief media that have deliberately conflated the two to generate agitation, outrage and clicks.

This is how he and Meghan work though. We have seen it since the OW show. Oh no we didn't say THAT...

Rincoe · Yesterday 13:37

corblimeygvnr · Yesterday 13:24

This is how he and Meghan work though. We have seen it since the OW show. Oh no we didn't say THAT...

But in this instance - these were the phrases recorded. He has not said ‘I am, and will always be a working member of the Royal Family’ - the media / SM has in this instance made this up for clicks and people have run with it.

Swipe left for the next trending thread