Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

PA & Sarah - problems stem from not enough £?

113 replies

HolidayHideaway · 20/02/2026 20:32

Sarah said in 1996 in all years together Andrew’s income never exceeded $50,000. Neither seem to understand money.

Has so much of this mess happened as neither had the funds for the life expected? PA had only a moderate sum from civil list & most went on official engagements & staff & his office.

An evening dress cost $4,000 & Sarah said in mid 90s (in her book ‘My Story’ written for USA audience hence dollar amounts) & she needed a lot, she began to quickly run up debt. She was expected to host Christmas parties for 250 & have hairdressers & make up artists, nannies etc. She was young & had no guidance & a spendthrift if unchecked by own admission - often buying very generous gifts for others.

The Queen seemed to give gifts NB: house but neither had money to run in manner expected.

If PA & SF had a steady & generous allowance would he have avoided ‘Epstein’ & much seediness? Presumably Will & Kate have always had access to bigger funds?

OP posts:
MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 21/02/2026 00:08

It must be so hard only being a millionaire when you are certain it must be your destiny to live like a billionaire.

I mean, it's no wonder that they had to turn to a rich paedophile for help. What else could they possibly have done?

DelectableMe · 21/02/2026 00:10

HolidayHideaway · 20/02/2026 22:48

Once the hope & prospects & moral trajectory felt they could be a force for good. It feels bewildering things happened as they did. Perhaps just A’s & SF’s character more heavily masked in earliest days.

Why is it bewildering?
They were greedy, stupid,. arrogant and entitled. They wanted to live a billionaire lifestyle without the wit, hard work, ability and resilience that successful people have.

Lunde · 21/02/2026 00:10

jeffgoldblum · 20/02/2026 23:55

This is ridiculous! , you say you are not a sf apologist but that is exactly what you are doing!!
it is common knowledge they were both looked after handsomely until the divorce, she got greedy and spent more than most of us will ever see in a lifetime on frivolous crap!

SF also made her own money from commercial projects post-divorce

  • she made an estimated £2-4 million from publishing and merchandising of the Budgie the Helicopter character
  • she was paid £1+ million a year from 1997-2001 by Weight Watchers
  • then she made money from TV appearances (Oprah, Friends etc) and endorsing projects (china, Avon etc)

Also didn't Epstein pay a lot of her bills from 1996-2011?

She just got greedy about living a billionaire lifestyle on millionaire money

JustAnotherWhinger · 21/02/2026 00:10

DelectableMe · 21/02/2026 00:05

Yes. Anne can even manage to support her children and grandchildren.
They're very rich people. Andrew and Ferguson were just more than averagely greedy, amoral and stupid.

Exactly.

I know the press play on the “frugal” thing with Anne when she wears an old outfit, but she’s not exactly been working out the Clubcard points to take the kids to a caravan for a few days in the holidays!

The Yorks just lived ridiculously beyond their means. Which is beyond ridiculous when you consider what their means were!

Andrews 250k civil list from 1990 is the equivalent of 624k now. With no mortgage, free transport, navy income, gifts, trust funds and investments from godparents and grandparents, plus other freebies they were absolutely minted.

Icecreamisthebest · 21/02/2026 00:13

Andrew and Sarah wanted to live a certain lifestyle that they could not afford.

So rather than realising they needed to live within their means and doing just that, like most people do, they chose to exploit their positions and make friends with dodgy people to live the lifestyle they wanted.

That's all there is to it.

I am sure that the palace could have given all kinds of budgeting assistance if that is what they had wanted. But they didn't. They wanted to live in a certain way and did not care what it took to get that.

Given the lifestyle they could afford without resorting to that is far superior to the vast majority of people, you must see that it is very galling to see them essentially say no that's not good enough for me and I am happy to behave corruptly as long as I get what I want.

DelectableMe · 21/02/2026 00:13

The late Queen paid school fees for the daughters and they had live in Norland nannies.
Having a house, transport, security and domestic staff provided for you would be enough for most people.

DelectableMe · 21/02/2026 00:15

Hasn't some Dubai royal also given them property there? Correct me if I'm wrong.

jeffgoldblum · 21/02/2026 00:24

Lunde · 21/02/2026 00:10

SF also made her own money from commercial projects post-divorce

  • she made an estimated £2-4 million from publishing and merchandising of the Budgie the Helicopter character
  • she was paid £1+ million a year from 1997-2001 by Weight Watchers
  • then she made money from TV appearances (Oprah, Friends etc) and endorsing projects (china, Avon etc)

Also didn't Epstein pay a lot of her bills from 1996-2011?

She just got greedy about living a billionaire lifestyle on millionaire money

Exactly! Is this part of her campaign to rehabilitate herself? , well it’s not going to work this time neither here nor the US !

jeffgoldblum · 21/02/2026 00:27

Sorry @HolidayHideaway, nice try but nope ! Andrew and Sarah are finished, no returns, no rehabilitation, no half baked explanations and their daughters will follow suit unless they understand that the bus not only has stopped here but has driven off the cliff and exploded!

JustAnotherWhinger · 21/02/2026 00:35

DelectableMe · 21/02/2026 00:15

Hasn't some Dubai royal also given them property there? Correct me if I'm wrong.

Apparently the head royal in Dubai has offered him use of accommodation there.

the former king of Spain lives out there since his abdication. Could end up being a real community of dodgy royals at this rate!

DelectableMe · 21/02/2026 00:40

JustAnotherWhinger · 21/02/2026 00:35

Apparently the head royal in Dubai has offered him use of accommodation there.

the former king of Spain lives out there since his abdication. Could end up being a real community of dodgy royals at this rate!

How delightful. I'm sure they'd all get on well.

Negroany · 21/02/2026 00:41

The others seem to manage on their pittances.

DelectableMe · 21/02/2026 00:42

Negroany · 21/02/2026 00:41

The others seem to manage on their pittances.

Indeed. It's funny how they managed to not get involved with Epstein, isn't it?

Blodwynne · 21/02/2026 01:41

JustAnotherWhinger · 20/02/2026 23:40

Sophie wasn’t trying to sell access to the Queen. She was just very indiscreet about the opinions of several royals, and the big one was her own opinions about politics, Tony Blair and if Charles and Camilla could marry while the Queen Mother was alive.

Her business partner was the one trying to sell access - to her and Edward.

ooh i don't know. she personally met the "Sheikh" and his entourage in the Dorchester to discuss doing PR with him and said well, if someone does PR with us "because of my situation" well...that happens. we don't promise that expressly. she called it an "unspoken benefit" in that transcript.

JustAnotherWhinger · 21/02/2026 10:34

Blodwynne · 21/02/2026 01:41

ooh i don't know. she personally met the "Sheikh" and his entourage in the Dorchester to discuss doing PR with him and said well, if someone does PR with us "because of my situation" well...that happens. we don't promise that expressly. she called it an "unspoken benefit" in that transcript.

That was about people choosing them because of her place, particularly those abroad who viewed her as a Princess (which technically she is) and hoped they may also see Edward at events she was working at, and the pull of who else may attend events (they used Julia Roberts as an example if I remember right - easier to get her to attend your event if you tell her a Princess is inviting her).

That’s not selling access to the Queen though. It’s 100% trading on her own place in the RF, but not comparable to her business partner later offering access to Edward for £££ or Sarah offering introductions to Andrew for £££.

DelectableMe · 21/02/2026 10:37

Yes, I think focussing on Sophie is letting SF off the hook. There really isn't a comparison.

Blodwynne · 21/02/2026 18:03

JustAnotherWhinger · 21/02/2026 10:34

That was about people choosing them because of her place, particularly those abroad who viewed her as a Princess (which technically she is) and hoped they may also see Edward at events she was working at, and the pull of who else may attend events (they used Julia Roberts as an example if I remember right - easier to get her to attend your event if you tell her a Princess is inviting her).

That’s not selling access to the Queen though. It’s 100% trading on her own place in the RF, but not comparable to her business partner later offering access to Edward for £££ or Sarah offering introductions to Andrew for £££.

Yes, because she didn't say it expressly its not the same!

goz · 21/02/2026 18:06

No I don’t think PA was affiliated with Epstein and had creepy if not illegal relationships with young women and girls because his allowance isn’t generous enough.

Egglio · 21/02/2026 18:10

There are plenty of people on a low income who manage not to abuse others and be self important entitled arseholes. So no, I don't think this would stopped them.

PeppyAmberHedgehog · 21/02/2026 19:49

Then how did his siblings and partners cope? Sophie for instance.

Gonefishingithink · 22/02/2026 23:13

HolidayHideaway · 20/02/2026 21:34

How to Edward & Sophie maintain lifestyle & home? An allowance?

That’s a good point.

NotMeAtAll · 23/02/2026 06:58

HolidayHideaway · 20/02/2026 21:32

Not enough for the £ life he seemed to want. SF wanted to work but it wasn’t easy in marriage. She got so little guidance on anything & was often lonely in early years. Or so she said.

I don't have enough money for the life I'm entitled to either. What is one to do. Imagine having to earn money like a "normal" person! 🤣🤣🤣 The peasants are so funny!

Pedallleur · 23/02/2026 06:59

DelectableMe · 21/02/2026 00:40

How delightful. I'm sure they'd all get on well.

Of course. Tax free and no scrutiny. Glass half full at least.

GasperyJacquesRoberts · 23/02/2026 07:44

HolidayHideaway · 20/02/2026 22:14

I don’t think it’s wrong to question how this all began. It’s an unprecedented situation.

"Greedy and not very bright people associate with awful people and end up in the shit" is hardly an unprecedented situation.

Serpentstooth · 24/02/2026 17:43

They are a pair of greedy grifters, just like all the other benefit cheats living in free public housing that MN likes to complain about. If they didn't have titles and lived on a council estate the DSS would have prosecuted them long ago. They would never have enough.

Swipe left for the next trending thread