Questions for Prince William as Earthshot Prize 'founding partner' appears in Epstein files

[YourBreezyPanda]

Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem appeared in the Epstein emails relating to a torture video.

The charity commission is looking into this. Will Earthshot make a comment or distance themselves?

Canadian pension giant already halted deals with DP World over this scandal.

Questions for Prince William as Earthshot Prize 'founding partner' appears in Epstein files

I am only repeating what you said. The word Elvis makes a mockery of the files. Your words.
I disagree.

I take issue with you twisting my posts as nowhere have I said:

a) the files were forged or
b) rubbished their contents.

🙄

The Royal Family are part of a big cartel of billionaires, who are busy scratching each others backs, trading favours for maximum profit.

Maybe we need to have another revolution.

👏👏👏

Epstein associate met Prince William in Buckingham Palace www.thetimes.com/article/5cb06061-0df8-45a5-8b97-94db0caceb16?shareToken=616df2a7c7e2303b6b18699b215e013e Jeffrey Epstein associate met Prince William in Buckingham Palace www.thetimes.com/article/5cb06061-0df8-45a5-8b97-94db0caceb16?shareToken=616df2a7c7e2303b6b18699b215e013e

Not sure how to post this properly, apologies for the amateurish attempt. It’s a good description of the relationship to DP World, which by the way, operates P&O Ferries.

I think that the RF, Mandelson, shady ME rich men are all inextricably linked. Maybe Mandelson linked William with Sultan. Out of all the possible rich individuals who could have been a founding member of that charity, I think it’s not a coincidence that it happens to be someone with deep Epstein connections. And that’s the point. The rot sits deep. It’s not just Andrew, who just happens to be the poster child of it all.

Agree wholeheartedly.

Well it's the same oft used tactic isn't it ? Funnily enough it's often the one they waaaah about - they pick on a word or two and try to twist it to show you are devoid of morals, an imbecile, an inferior specimen , a racist, a misogynist or any other " ist". It's so obvious.

If you think making a mockery of, means something else, that's up to you. I disagree.
"Making a mockery of" means to make something appear absurd, useless, ridiculous, or completely ineffective, often by violating its intent or purpose. It implies exposing something (like a system, plan, or person) to contempt or ridicule, effectively undermining its seriousness or credibility

We shall have to agree to disagree before we drive everyone off this thread!

Yes you could leave it there, couldn't you? 😂

Yes, it’s certainly very familiar.

Wait here's the evidence -

Crass

The files consist of all his email and Skype (I miss Skype) records and are searchable and so any reference can be put in context, no need for distractions, fill your boots. After the shrieking about hiding data and coverups this is the compromise where we get everything including the trivial.
www.justice.gov/epstein/search

Elvis is there as you have all his emails and some youtube links, Epstein liked Elvis. There are also references to Khan academy, Maths and Biology. Not everything will be relevant to his crimes.

It's also important to remember, as per the DOJ letter to Congress link from the previous release, that the files can also contain false images and documents sent in by the public. Everything is included in the trawl.

This production may include fake or falsely submitted images, documents or videos, as everything that was sent to the FBI by the public was included in the production that is responsive to the Act.

https://archive.is/x3BFF

(There's a link to the full text of the letter.)

This is part of the problem. There is so much and people disregard or make their own judgements of what is valid or legitimate that it becomes very murky. The danger is some being accused wrongly and others escaping.

I looked at the alphabetical list. I saw Prince Harry and Prince Philip listed as well as Meghan Markle but no Prince William or Princess Catherine. I know it's the Mail but they do explain that the names were just listed and not a sign of guilt.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15562063/Pam-Bondi-Epstein-files-released-high-profile-names.html

The names mean nothing and it's Pam Bondi trying to shut everyone up. For instance, Janis Joplin's name is on there, she died in 1970 when Epstein was about 15!
And Biden's children are on there but not a Trump!
Given Trump's name is redacted 38,000 times, hard to believe the word Trump is not on the list
It's rotten to the core
The US Attorney General is a joke

@simpsonthecat do you mean you’d expect to see a Trump child on the list - Donald and Melania are on there, which of the children were you anticipating being on the list?

Jared Kushner is named.

I cannot believe the sons aren't on there

Ah the names mean nothing now ......

Yes absolutely. And privileged material is still withheld due to 'government officials' and 'politically exposed individuals' appearing in the files.
Sounds like a cover up to me.
So despite saying everything has been released - it hasn't.

I guess we Joe Public will never really know then but for some posters it's enough for them to go into hysterics when eg Princess Anne is mentioned. They obviously think it means something.

It’s business as usual for Earthshot - W has announced it’s off to India.

I don't understand why if so many women were abused yet so few have come forward. I know all of these men have £££££ to fight legal battles but it doesn't make sense how quiet the impacted women are which makes me wonder if some did come forward and they accepted settlements to stay quiet.