Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family
Thread gallery
51
PrayForMyBum · 04/02/2026 09:46

Well, PA says* this morning's trial should continue with Graham Johnson on the stand - should be an interesting day. Surely he's now the claimants' star witness when it comes to the 'evidence'?

(*it has been wrong before!)

Lunde · 04/02/2026 10:20

PrayForMyBum · 04/02/2026 09:46

Well, PA says* this morning's trial should continue with Graham Johnson on the stand - should be an interesting day. Surely he's now the claimants' star witness when it comes to the 'evidence'?

(*it has been wrong before!)

Interesting to see what convicted hacker and self-confessed inventor of information - now "researcher" for Hacked Off - has to say.

Didn't he invent the whole "Beast of Bodmin" story?

https://spectator.com/article/the-real-phone-hacking-scandal/

The ‘professional liar’ at the heart of Prince Harry’s hacking claim

In the summer of 2019, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were visiting their friends Elton John and David Furnish in the south of France when they were introduced to the barrister David Sherborne. This ‘chance’ meeting would be a massive coup for the man...

https://spectator.com/article/the-real-phone-hacking-scandal/

GwendolineFairfax8 · 04/02/2026 10:41

@Lunde

Another brilliant article. I didn’t realise Emma Jones (on the board of Hacked Off) is Graham Johnson’s partner!

Baital · 04/02/2026 12:00

Blimey!

There must be more evidence? For a trial where the lawyers costs are £38 million?

After all, the judge didn't dismiss the case, they allowed it to go ahead?

RecoIIectionsMayVary · 04/02/2026 13:19

I want someone to come on to this thread and argue for the prosecution - I just can't see what they have got

bluegreygreen · 04/02/2026 14:18

Agree @RecoIIectionsMayVary.

I keep reminding myself that we have weeks of evidence to come, so there must be some that will be valid, but so far nothing has been convincing - so much so that I wonder what I'm missing.

OP posts:
TheAutumnCrow · 04/02/2026 14:52

GwendolineFairfax8 · 04/02/2026 10:41

@Lunde

Another brilliant article. I didn’t realise Emma Jones (on the board of Hacked Off) is Graham Johnson’s partner!

Oh that board is very interesting.

Btw sorry I don’t have any further info on the legal insurance policy but if I come across any I’ll remember you asked.

TheAutumnCrow · 04/02/2026 15:04

RecoIIectionsMayVary · 04/02/2026 13:19

I want someone to come on to this thread and argue for the prosecution - I just can't see what they have got

Yes - what are we all missing? How is this actually happening??

I’ve heard that journalists Katy Nicholl and possibly Rebecca English are to give evidence (I think Tom Sykes mentioned it), but am I right in thinking that they don’t have to reveal their sources if they don’t want to? But I think a few of their sources might be … royally interesting. So maybe they will reveal them.

Anyway, it’s up to the claimants to make their case, as pp keep rightly pointing out. The claimants don’t seem to have made anything stick.

binkie163 · 04/02/2026 15:17

Sherborne was over confident once before when he tried to sue the sun for libel representing Johnny Depp. They printed amber heards statement and photos. Sherborn wanted to sue, he lost. Had he sued AH which Depp did in America he could have won but Sherborne wanted another high profile press scalp. Backfired!
Sherborne should have known he couldn't win but obviously didn't understand the distinction of who libeled Depp.

PrayForMyBum · 04/02/2026 15:21

Both are definitely giving evidence, @TheAutumnCrow as are dozens of other journalists involved in all of the claimants' selected stories.
The ultimate issue for Justice Nicklin is that they don't have to reveal their sources. But they can rely on what was written in their notebooks at the time, any emails (redacted to protect anyone) and phone logs as well as payments to sources, plus - which seems relevant in this case! - anything that had already been written in other publications before the Mail's stories went out.

OccasionalHope · 04/02/2026 18:00

They have Feelings.

I sometimes wonder if this might not be a sneaky and very expensive way o uncover who the sources actually are?

bluegreygreen · 04/02/2026 20:46

Guardian report of Graham Johnson's evidence:

https://archive.is/KGkLJ

The figures being paid out are staggering, but apparently “I never paid for witness evidence which was used in legal proceedings".

Really?

OP posts:
Lunde · 04/02/2026 21:04

There is also a Telegraph article but I can't get it to archive

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2026/02/04/max-mosley-future-witnesses-thousands-prince-harry-legal/

TheAutumnCrow · 04/02/2026 21:16

From the Telegraph:

The court heard that, separately, a company set up by Mosley gave a £565,000 business loan to Mr Johnson’s Yellow Press publishing company, which promised lucrative book deals to several private investigators.

Mr Johnson, who worked for the Sunday Mirror and the News of the World, received a suspended sentence for one count of phone hacking in 2014 and is now a key member of the claimants’ “legal research team”, having acquired various admissions, affidavits and evidential material from his contacts.

Giving evidence on Wednesday, he said Mosley, son of fascist leader Oswald Mosley, was the “main funder” of his operation and agreed that, while it was “complicated”, one of the late businessman’s objectives was to assist potential claimants in bringing proceedings against ANL.

He said he had several discussions with Mosley about their aims and that in February 2018, he was told to make the Daily Mail his priority.

“I’m paraphrasing,” Mr Johnson told the court. “But he said to me, ‘I want you to go back to the ANL investigation and I want you to restart it and the objective this time is to beef up the propaganda and, in addition, to launch claims against ANL’.”

Bloody hell. And this guy Johnson is the one with the partner on the Board of Hacked Off?

Lunde · 04/02/2026 21:20

The "cash for witnesses" all sounds really dubious - it seems clear they were paying money to produce the "right" results. As Evan Harris put it last week: "no tickee, no monkee."

...................................................................................

Max Mosley provided tens of thousands of pounds to pay future witnesses ahead of Prince Harry’s privacy claim and wanted to “beef up the propaganda” against the publisher of the Daily Mail, the High Court has heard.
Graham Johnson, a former tabloid journalist, used the money to make regular payments to an array of private investigators accused of unlawful activity, several of whom are now at the heart of the current litigation.
The Duke of Sussex, Baroness Lawrence and Sir Elton John are among seven claimants suing Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL) for breach of privacy, alleging phone hacking, bugging and blagging.
Advertisement

The publisher refutes the “preposterous” claims and has alleged that “purported evidence” had been “obtained through financial inducements and threats”.
^^
Prince Harry, arriving at the Royal Courts of Justice last month, has brought a privacy claim against the publisher of the Daily Mail Credit: Peter Nicholls/Getty
One private investigator, Gavin Burrows, was paid £75,000, while convicted phone hackers Glenn Mulcaire and Greg Miskiw were paid £22,320 and £12,650 respectively, the court heard.
US-based private investigator Daniel Portley-Hanks was paid £6,000, plus additional sums of up to £290 ($400) a day for his “time”, while private investigators Steve Whittamore and Christine Hart were paid at least £9,000 between them.
The court heard that, separately, a company set up by Mosley gave a £565,000 business loan to Mr Johnson’s Yellow Press publishing company, which promised lucrative book deals to several private investigators.
Mr Johnson, who worked for the Sunday Mirror and the News of the World, received a suspended sentence for one count of phone hacking in 2014 and is now a key member of the claimants’ “legal research team”, having acquired various admissions, affidavits and evidential material from his contacts.

ThePoshUns · 04/02/2026 21:31

How has this ever got to court?

Lunde · 04/02/2026 21:33

ThePoshUns · 04/02/2026 21:31

How has this ever got to court?

I think they expected ANL to fold and settle before it got to trial.

ThePoshUns · 04/02/2026 21:36

Looks like it.

bluegreygreen · 04/02/2026 21:37

Thanks @CraftyGin

Telegraph archive link https://archive.is/k8JwZ

However, Mr Johnson insisted that his focus was solely journalism and that he had banned Dr Harris from sharing his material with lawyers, journalists or politicians for fear that they would “lose control” of it and their “operation” would be thwarted.

So none of the evidence in this case has come from Graham Johnson, then, if he 'banned' it from being shared with lawyers?

OP posts:
TheAutumnCrow · 04/02/2026 21:48

This is looking, to use the vernacular of my dearest child, ‘proper mental’.

bluegreygreen · 04/02/2026 21:59

“I’m paraphrasing,” Mr Johnson told the court. “But he said to me, ‘I want you to go back to the ANL investigation and I want you to restart it and the objective this time is to beef up the propaganda and, in addition, to launch claims against ANL’.”

Just reading that paragraph @TheAutumnCrow - assuming it was true, why on earth would you think it was a good thing to 'paraphrase' in court?

OP posts:
Lunde · 04/02/2026 22:21

It's astonishing that these are the witnesses Sherborne has called to support the claimants' side! Did the claimants know that Max Mosley and Johnson were paying thousands of pounds to convicted hackers? - although it makes a great ex-con income stream

ANL haven't even started on their defence yet.

bluegreygreen · 04/02/2026 22:23

Agree @Lunde - it feels like ANL just have to wind them up and watch them go!

OP posts:
Lunde · 04/02/2026 22:27

DM article
A convicted phone hacker used money from Formula One boss Max Mosley to pay a string of private investigators at the centre of the Prince Harry privacy case, the High Court heard on Wednesday.
Graham Johnson said more than £125,000 was paid to other hackers, alleged 'blaggers' and private detectives during his research into claims against the Daily Mail and The Mail On Sunday.
He denied, however, the payments were part of a plan to bring legal claims against the newspapers, or that they amounted to paying witnesses for their evidence.
But he said Mr Mosley, a prominent privacy campaigner, had later effectively told him to 'beef up the propaganda' against the newspaper group and to restart a campaign against it.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15528973/Max-Mosley-daily-mail-high-court.html

Max Mosley firm loaned £565,000 to firm of phone hacker targeting Mail

A convicted phone hacker used money from Formula One boss Max Mosley to pay private investigators at the centre of the Prince Harry privacy case, the High Court heard on Wednesday.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15528973/Max-Mosley-daily-mail-high-court.html

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread