Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Why was Prince Philip allowed to keep saying offensive things?

482 replies

SewANeedlePullingThread · 06/01/2026 10:30

There are so many examples of Philip saying offensive things such as:

"If you stay here much longer you'll all be slitty-eyed." This was said to a group of students during a royal visit to China.

"If a cricketer, for instance, suddenly decided to go into a school and batter a lot of people to death with a cricket bat, which he could do very easily, I mean, are you going to ban cricket bats?" This was said in response to calls to ban guns after the Dunblane incident.

"It looks as if it was put in by an Indian." This was Philip talking about a fuse box in a factory.

There are so many more examples. Why was he allowed to act this way whilst representing the Royal Family? I like a laugh, I can take a joke, but he was so often just really offensive.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
Politicians247UnderwearExtinguishingService · 06/01/2026 11:49

Nourishinghandcream · 06/01/2026 11:27

"It looks as if it was put in by an Indian." This was Philip talking about a fuse box in a factory.

The way this one was reported in the press really annoyed me at the time, I actually felt FOR him.

A common phrase (which is still in use today) is refer to substandard work as being done by a cowboy. PH was not exactly a man of the people and quite simply used the wrong term (i.e. cowboys & indians) while trying to be relevant to the people he was meeting.

IMHO, that actually makes it much worse; not better - and indicative of his dismissive negative attitude to people from non-white backgrounds.

"Whatever - I can't be bothered to think before I speak; I just know that they're all incompetent charlatans, every one of them interchangeably". He could have said 'rogues', 'scammers', 'bodgers', 'crooks'.... plenty of 100% negative words to choose from that are based on somebody's deliberate dishonest actions and don't happen to bear any resemblance to a nationality/race.

The royals like to make out that they don't have any real power, but that they work very hard as ambassadors and representatives of the country. If they can't even do that without causing gross offence on behalf of the whole country, what on earth is the point of them? At least Gerald Ratner only spoke on behalf of his own company and not the entire nation.

PP was also still driving 20 years after that event, so I don't think we can write him off as having been old and too doddery to be responsible for anything that he said or did back then.

MrsSkylerWhite · 06/01/2026 11:50

Zippedydodah · 06/01/2026 10:57

It was pretty much acceptable at that time, it’s easy to look back and criticise what happened nearly 50 years ago. Many people made similar comments, no one batted an eyelid generally. I was brought up surrounded by people who I now realise would be considered racist and bigots, that was society where I lived, including my parents, grandparents and their friends.
Yes, it’s highly offensive and illegal now, but society now bears no resemblance to what it was then.
No one batted an eyelid at The Black and White Minstrels Show, Some like it hot, golliwog dolls and badges and many other things verboten today.

Edited

Interesting. I’ve mentioned in other threads that I was taken to see the Black and White Mi steels as a very young child. I’m 61 now. It felt very uncomfortable and wrong to me. Couldn’t have explained why, it just did.

As for Philip, who was going to stop him? He wasn’t the sharpest tool in the box. Probably not overloaded with sensitivity or empathy, either.

Pretty weird that an 18 year old naval officer entered into regular correspondence with a 13 year old child princess, too.

Hellohelga · 06/01/2026 11:51

DofE had no power, so he was seen as an occasionally embarrassing side kick to the queen. Boris Johnson however with his jibes about pillar boxes and pickaninnies, was PM and represented us on the world stage, yet he got away with it too. Seems we tolerate causal racism if it’s “just a joke”.

Calenderfoot · 06/01/2026 11:51

SewANeedlePullingThread · 06/01/2026 10:40

It’s no excuse. The comments I posted, I believe were all from the mid 80s to 2000 ish. I was a young child to young adult then and these things were not acceptable. My grandad was born around the same time as Philip and learnt that these things were not acceptable. Philip had access to a wide range of people, the resources to educate himself and was in a position where he should have set an example. Instead he chose to continue to be offensive and racist.

It wasn't acceptable then, as evidenced by the fact you remember it, there was a huge fuss at the time, but he was almost 80 then, so was from a different time.

Also I think it might have been a symptom of his age and he meant cowboys.

Dollymylove · 06/01/2026 11:52

CurlewKate · 06/01/2026 11:44

What sort of thing might you want to say that you think you would get into trouble for?

This is the problem, nobody knows, as it seems that every other day something becomes offensive to someone , who wasnt offended th day before 😉

Elbowpatch · 06/01/2026 11:53

SerendipityJane · 06/01/2026 11:45

Not to me.

HTH.

I suspect Prince Philip felt the same way about the things he said that others have deemed to be offensive.

Pot calling the kettle black.

Glowingup · 06/01/2026 11:53

Stop him how? Also there’s people now saying the most outrageous things (eg Andrew Tate) and they are permitted to do so. It’s not just something that happened in the past. People took offence at the time when PP said this stuff but that’s about all that can happen really. Unless you think he should have been stripped of his title or something.

OnlyAfterwards · 06/01/2026 11:55

CurlewKate · 06/01/2026 10:40

Because he was down to earth, said it like it was, said what everyone else was thinking, was a breath of fresh air, was hilarious, was a character, -have I missed anything?

Edited

Exactly. In fact, he was a racist, classist pillock, but I suppose if you're kowtowing, you want to convince yourself the person you're kowtowing to has some worth.

HoppityBun · 06/01/2026 11:56

"It looks as if it was put in by an Indian." This was Philip talking about a fuse box in a factory.

I have always felt sorry for Prince P about this particular one. He was so clearly thinking of the expression “a cowboy job”. He was trying to find expression, his brain thought of cowboys and Indians and he said Indian. Perhaps people don’t use that expression anymore.

I know that most people on here are highly intelligent, don’t get muddled and don’t have people pick up on what they say. But for some of us, it’s a mistake that’s readily understandable.

Berlinlover · 06/01/2026 11:56

From what I remember the Chinese weren’t offended at all and it was reported at the time that Chinese elders would tell the younger generation not to stay too long in the West as they might become round eyed.

CurlewKate · 06/01/2026 11:57

Dollymylove · 06/01/2026 11:52

This is the problem, nobody knows, as it seems that every other day something becomes offensive to someone , who wasnt offended th day before 😉

What was the last example you heard?

MrsSkylerWhite · 06/01/2026 11:57

Berlinlover · 06/01/2026 11:56

From what I remember the Chinese weren’t offended at all and it was reported at the time that Chinese elders would tell the younger generation not to stay too long in the West as they might become round eyed.

“The Chinese”?

Who all feel exactly the same way. Obviously 🙄

Falalalalaaaalalalalaaaa · 06/01/2026 11:58

CurlewKate · 06/01/2026 10:40

Because he was down to earth, said it like it was, said what everyone else was thinking, was a breath of fresh air, was hilarious, was a character, -have I missed anything?

Edited

Yes, you’ve entirely missed the racism. Definitely “not what everyone else was thinking.” If you were thinking it, that makes you racist too.

SelfRaisingFlour · 06/01/2026 11:59

Geez, he said a few things over a 70 year period of doing public engagements and journalists kept repeating the same few things he said. Was the Queen supposed to divorce him or cut off his pocket money or something?

PistachioTiramisu · 06/01/2026 11:59

Whether you approved of Prince Philip or not, what is the point in complaining about the language/mannerisms of somebody who has been dead for nearly 5 years? Give it a rest.

Foyleriver · 06/01/2026 11:59

Kimura · 06/01/2026 11:48

And stuff like Bo Selecta and Little Britain were still considered acceptable on C4 and the BBC in the mid-late 00s. Come Fly With Me had multiple black/brown/yellow face characters and was broadcast on BBC 1 in 2010. They were only removed from streaming services in 2019-2020. We're not to far removed from laughing at casual racism.

Phillip got away with it partly because he reminded everyone of something their old grandad would have let slip, and partly because a lot of people secretly would like to be able to say those things today.

Agree. It’s ridiculous to measure Philip by today’s standards.

It also shows the absolute inability of many people to view the world as anything other than black and white, right and wrong - there are no shades of grey.

Yes, he was an offensive boor and probably casually racist, at a time when that was not uncommon. 30 years ago when shows like these were on, he would have been in his 70s. So right up to his old age, sexism and racism were on mainstream TV

FanFckingTastic · 06/01/2026 12:00

we should all have a bit of resilience and think about the context.

I think that this is a very good point. Prince Philip was white and privileged and came from a very different background and era to many of us. This doesn't excuse his behavior but you have to judge the words of someone based on the time and the place, not on the thinking of today. I recall as a child growing up that we referred to mixed race people as 'half-cast' - now I understand that this is offensive but at the time is wasn't seen as so. Language moves on, as does our perception on what is or isn't acceptable.

Falalalalaaaalalalalaaaa · 06/01/2026 12:01

Glowingup · 06/01/2026 11:53

Stop him how? Also there’s people now saying the most outrageous things (eg Andrew Tate) and they are permitted to do so. It’s not just something that happened in the past. People took offence at the time when PP said this stuff but that’s about all that can happen really. Unless you think he should have been stripped of his title or something.

Well if he can’t be stopped from blurting offensive racist comments he should not have been in public life. And if they couldn’t stop him being in public life, there should have been heartfelt apologies for his comments issued by the Queen.

Oh yes, the same Queen who didn’t have a problem with her beloved son Andrew.

The whole family is messed up and they don’t deserve their positions or wealth or privilege.

Dragonflytamer · 06/01/2026 12:01

Because he was the Queen Husband and the Queen could do what ever she wants. We have elected representatives but we aren't a republic. It's fortunate we haven't had a off with their head type monarch for a few hundred years.

ThisIsAGlobalPlayerOriginalPodcast · 06/01/2026 12:02

So…what? Do we retrospectively cancel him, or…?

I mean what’s the actual point?

FrostAtMinuit · 06/01/2026 12:03

Falalalalaaaalalalalaaaa · 06/01/2026 11:58

Yes, you’ve entirely missed the racism. Definitely “not what everyone else was thinking.” If you were thinking it, that makes you racist too.

I think @CurlewKate is being ironic here, not saying this is how she viewed him.

WinterAconite · 06/01/2026 12:03

People love Princess Ann but I see her as quite rude and haughty. I remember a video of her tripping over in high heels and someone trying to help her up and she was really rude to them. I believe she also called someone stupid at an Olympic committee. Sometimes when someone rich and powerful is described as "not suffering fools" it just means they're rude.

sesquipedalian · 06/01/2026 12:03

Autres temps, autres moeurs, OP. Twenty years hence, there is bound to be something on these pages that will cause a sharp intake of breath - it’s just how things go.

Falalalalaaaalalalalaaaa · 06/01/2026 12:04

There is a clear difference between Andrew Tate and the spouse of the monarch who literally represents our country.

Different behavioural standards apply to different roles.

How would parents react if a primary school teacher said “don’t hang around with Mavis too much, you’ll get slitty eyes.”

I grew up in the 70s/80s and we already knew not to use offensive and racist names and words. What’s Phillip’s excuse?

ZenNudist · 06/01/2026 12:05

You've just trotted out the most high profile examples from an era when racism sexism xenophobia and homophobia were rife. These kind of jokes were all over the BBC. He was "of his time" and they were acknowledged as gaffes at the time. If prince William said these things now he'd be pilloried but rightly so.

What a pointless thread. He's been dead years.

Swipe left for the next trending thread