Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Why was Prince Philip allowed to keep saying offensive things?

482 replies

SewANeedlePullingThread · 06/01/2026 10:30

There are so many examples of Philip saying offensive things such as:

"If you stay here much longer you'll all be slitty-eyed." This was said to a group of students during a royal visit to China.

"If a cricketer, for instance, suddenly decided to go into a school and batter a lot of people to death with a cricket bat, which he could do very easily, I mean, are you going to ban cricket bats?" This was said in response to calls to ban guns after the Dunblane incident.

"It looks as if it was put in by an Indian." This was Philip talking about a fuse box in a factory.

There are so many more examples. Why was he allowed to act this way whilst representing the Royal Family? I like a laugh, I can take a joke, but he was so often just really offensive.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
Hollyleaves · 06/01/2026 12:53

SewANeedlePullingThread · 06/01/2026 10:40

It’s no excuse. The comments I posted, I believe were all from the mid 80s to 2000 ish. I was a young child to young adult then and these things were not acceptable. My grandad was born around the same time as Philip and learnt that these things were not acceptable. Philip had access to a wide range of people, the resources to educate himself and was in a position where he should have set an example. Instead he chose to continue to be offensive and racist.

I totally agree no excuse. But what the hell could someone do? The police nothing. The government nothing. I’m sure they told him in private and he shrugged and said so what.

Meadowfinch · 06/01/2026 12:55

3peassuit · 06/01/2026 10:48

To those saying it was the norm in the past, my late father was born in 1919. I never once heard him use racist language and if he had he would most certainly have been pulled up on it by me and my siblings. Prince Phillip got away with saying the unsayable because of his privilege.

It really was the norm.

Have you ever watched any 70s or 80s tv? Bless this House, Steptoe & Son, On the buses, even mild things like Terry & June. Comedy was very different then, and PP was in his 60s and 70s by then.

DBSFstupid · 06/01/2026 12:55

hellowhaaat3632 · 06/01/2026 10:44

I thought the slitty eyed thing was hilarious. I'm Chinese.

Policing comedy is how authoritarian states start. Know the signs.

Yes and look what's happening to the wonderful british sense of humour and our comedy - it's being shut down or our comedians cancelled. My Nana - a cockney would be so confused and upset.

BoredZelda · 06/01/2026 12:55

hellowhaaat3632 · 06/01/2026 10:50

Either way, saying offensive things isn't a crime. Nor should they be. Least you one day find yourself on the "wrong side" - what then?

Where did OP say he should be charged with a crime?

The question surely is, why didn’t the media go after him in the same way as they have with other members of the RF when they are deemed to have done wrong (Harry, Diana, Sarah etc). Why did Phillip hold such a beloved status with the British Public? Why did the RF continue to put him in the position of making these comments? The could have trotted him out every 6 months for proof of life and nobody would have bothered.

Defending freedom of speech doesn’t mean enabling people to be racist and keeping quiet about it.

firstofallimadelight · 06/01/2026 12:56

Because he was a rich upper class white man with powerful connections.
They did try to keep him out the public eye in the last handful of years before his death.

HelpMeGetThrough · 06/01/2026 12:58

BoredZelda · 06/01/2026 12:55

Where did OP say he should be charged with a crime?

The question surely is, why didn’t the media go after him in the same way as they have with other members of the RF when they are deemed to have done wrong (Harry, Diana, Sarah etc). Why did Phillip hold such a beloved status with the British Public? Why did the RF continue to put him in the position of making these comments? The could have trotted him out every 6 months for proof of life and nobody would have bothered.

Defending freedom of speech doesn’t mean enabling people to be racist and keeping quiet about it.

Why would the press bite the hand that was feeding them.

I am sure the Journalists were praying he was going to come out with something.

CurlewKate · 06/01/2026 12:58

Falalalalaaaalalalalaaaa · 06/01/2026 11:58

Yes, you’ve entirely missed the racism. Definitely “not what everyone else was thinking.” If you were thinking it, that makes you racist too.

🤣🤣I think you might have missed something too!

simpsonthecat · 06/01/2026 13:00

The royals like to make out that they don't have any real power, but that they work very hard as ambassadors and representatives of the country. If they can't even do that without causing gross offence on behalf of the whole country, what on earth is the point of them? At least Gerald Ratner only spoke on behalf of his own company and not the entire nation

They are untouchable.

simpsonthecat · 06/01/2026 13:02

As for her cousins, they were severely disabled and non verbal, and were institutionalised by their mother in the 1930s when QE2 was just a child, she has nothing to do with it. Plus that's what most people did at that time, in all sections of society. It was the norm. It's not even clear if she knew they were still alive, but what should she have done anyway? Hauled them out from where they'd lived for years and put them...where exactly? Doing what?

They were QE2's first cousins FFS. One of them didn't even have a gravestone until the press got hold of it. And ooops, we better sort that!
You are talking like it's a century ago. One of them only died in 2014

Appalling.

DBSFstupid · 06/01/2026 13:03

Sweetiedarling7 · 06/01/2026 11:04

You are judging past comments by today’s norms.
Not only were these things said in a very different era Prince Philip himself would have grown up in an era before that.
Don’t you know any older people at all who say things now which younger people mostly wouldn’t say?
Whilst there is a line which shouldn’t be crossed we should all have a bit of resilience and think about the context.
I get so bored of professional offence takers flouting their moral superiority.
Often wonder if those doing so actually do anything practical to help anyone or just like to pose.

👏👏👏I'm absolutely sick to death of them and so are many others.

BoredZelda · 06/01/2026 13:03

Dollymylove · 06/01/2026 11:41

Given the fact that hes well and truly dead, hes not going be saying offensive things anymore, is he, so why the angst?
Things were different in Philips era, Im glad that its no longer acceptable to mock race, disability etc but I think things have swung too far the other way, in that somebody can say something innocuous, harmless etc, but if one other person decides its offensive, youre in bother.
Probably why so many people are so miserable nowadays, they are terrified to say anything lest they offend someone.
Im glad im no longer in the workplace !!

If you are regularly holding your tongue because you’re told you are offensive, then perhaps consider you are, in fact, offensive?

FunMustard · 06/01/2026 13:03

Have you ever known any older people? You can tell them till you're blue in the face that what they're saying is - at best - rude AF, and if they don't care they don't care. He didn't care.

@Falalalalaaaalalalalaaaa how do you know your child's primary school teacher isn't saying that to her child or her family members? You don't. It just happens to be that he was in the public eye so it was seen. You literally say "Different behavioural standards apply to different roles" and then compare a teacher to Prince Phillip!

BoredZelda · 06/01/2026 13:04

HelpMeGetThrough · 06/01/2026 12:58

Why would the press bite the hand that was feeding them.

I am sure the Journalists were praying he was going to come out with something.

Which is the question OP is asking.

BoredZelda · 06/01/2026 13:05

DBSFstupid · 06/01/2026 12:55

Yes and look what's happening to the wonderful british sense of humour and our comedy - it's being shut down or our comedians cancelled. My Nana - a cockney would be so confused and upset.

Are you suggesting we have no avenue for comedy if we can’t be racist? Because that’s a wild take.

Soontobe60 · 06/01/2026 13:05

SewANeedlePullingThread · 06/01/2026 11:05

To reiterate, the comments in my OP were said between the mid 80s and the year 2000 ish. The one about the Indian was in 1999. It was not acceptable then. the Black and White minstrels show finished in the 70s!

What about Matt Lucas wearing blackface in his shows - Little Britain and then Come Fly With Me (which aired in 2010)? And don’t forget his other characters - pretending to be disabled, homophobic, misogynistic and so on. He’s just been awarded an OBE!

BoredZelda · 06/01/2026 13:06

HelpMeGetThrough · 06/01/2026 12:51

No, probably meant most, not including the professionally offended on here.

Ahh, if people don’t like racism they are “professionally offended” is that it?

You think people who are the actual targets of racism are generally fine with it?

DBSFstupid · 06/01/2026 13:08

BoredZelda · 06/01/2026 13:05

Are you suggesting we have no avenue for comedy if we can’t be racist? Because that’s a wild take.

No that's not what I'm suggesting. I'm replying to the previous posters comment that policing comedy is how authoritarian states start. So don't twist my words.

Sixseventeen · 06/01/2026 13:09

He’s been dead for years. What’s the point of ruminating over it now?

kingtamponthefurred · 06/01/2026 13:12

Because his wife was too soft with him and nobody else had the authority to shut the silly old bugger up.

LinedOverLatte · 06/01/2026 13:13

Probably for the same reason Andrew was able to carry on without consequences, Charles was able to conduct an affair (as was Anne), Diana was fed to the wolves, the Queen Mother was rude and spiteful etc etc - they’re an entitled bunch of liars with no concern for ‘commoners’, surrounded by people who bow and scrape and say yes.

Behind closed doors the queen might have been an absolute bitch but everyone fell for the ‘sweet little old lady’ they saw on TV. She certainly did little to help Diana, Meghan or hold her off spring to account. Nor did she make changes to cut the civil list, and ensured her crusty old relatives were kept in luxury.

William wants to end homelessness. He personally has the wealth and means to do just that without affecting his lifestyle at all. Does he put his hand in his pocket? Does he fuck. He puts his hand out for more freebies and avoids paying taxes on his Duchy empire.

The whole lot are a total waste of space and money. Tourists would still visit - they don’t come here just to look at royal houses - and it’s a weak argument to say they wouldn’t.

TheDogParade · 06/01/2026 13:14

Sixseventeen · 06/01/2026 13:09

He’s been dead for years. What’s the point of ruminating over it now?

People tried to discuss it on here when he was alive and the answers were similar with lots of racist apologisers and minimising.

People in the family that said nothing, at least publicly, about his comments are still alive. Why shouldn’t it be discussed? It’s funny how people are all for Prince Philip being able to say what he wanted, but then try to close down conversation about him. Ironic really.

BoredZelda · 06/01/2026 13:16

Soontobe60 · 06/01/2026 13:05

What about Matt Lucas wearing blackface in his shows - Little Britain and then Come Fly With Me (which aired in 2010)? And don’t forget his other characters - pretending to be disabled, homophobic, misogynistic and so on. He’s just been awarded an OBE!

Which they faced a huge backlash about, even at the time. The racism was probably deemed by many as the least of the problems with LB. It was not ok at the time, god knows why it took everyone so long to remove it from streaming services.

His OBE comes alongside many other prominent Jewish figures. Perhaps that’s been part of the reason he was chosen. It seems an odd choice generally, given he has done little more than his sketch shows and would be considered C-List at best nowadays.

AndreaMarvell · 06/01/2026 13:18

Elbowpatch · 06/01/2026 11:45

Isn’t “gammon” an offensive term?

It's a nickname for middle aged, mostly overweight, white blokes of a particular political persuasion. We might not like those people but saying gammon is still offensive. Like calling someone a boomer I guess.

BoredZelda · 06/01/2026 13:20

DBSFstupid · 06/01/2026 13:08

No that's not what I'm suggesting. I'm replying to the previous posters comment that policing comedy is how authoritarian states start. So don't twist my words.

It’s not actually how they start, but people like to pretend it is because it’s a great reason to stand up for racists.

You asked what was happening to the wonderful British sense of humour. What exactly is happening to it, then, in your opinion, if you aren’t lamenting the loss of the “good old’ days” of Bernard Manning, Bless this House and Jim Davidson?

Sequinsoneverythingplease · 06/01/2026 13:20

Because at the time we weren’t in a place in where we were fanatical about finding offence in absolutely every comment or opinion towards every area of society and its vast amount of social groups. Most people rolled their eyes and dismissed him as an out of touch upper class snobby type who didn’t live in the real world. We hadn’t yet decided that everyone needed to be publicly shamed, punished & have their lives destroyed for all their past “misdeeds” which would now be judged contextually by new current values which had filtered down from all the “critical theories” being pushed in HE.

He’s dead now and so is his wife. I wouldn’t worry too much about it I were you.