Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family
Thread gallery
21
OlympicWomen · 19/12/2025 18:58

ImAbigDill · 19/12/2025 18:50

It’s amazing getting your kids involved in helping out those in need, especially when those kids are extremely privileged but the way they have worded the statement it’s just so odd.

Yes, I agree. It's definitely a formal involvement and long term.
That seems to be their future?

MaturingCheeseball · 19/12/2025 19:02

I would never criticise the children’s appearance - the picture just looks a bit odd size-wise - a bit stretched somehow.

However I will gladly criticise Harry’s hair. Look, mate, you need a best friend and a mirror. Those transplants haven’t taken and you’ve got werewolf bits on the side and some bum fluff on the top. Just accept your genes and shave the lot off. It really would look a whole lot better. Or if you can’t bear to be like your brother, get one of those glue-on wigs that male rock stars/celebrities wear. But the current sparse crop teased on your bonce looks daft.

threesocksmorgan · 19/12/2025 19:05

jeffgoldblum · 19/12/2025 17:51

Here it is.

Now that is nice

NortyElf · 19/12/2025 19:07

Whats the matter with her ankles!!!!!!! And Lili's foot!!!!!!

Ohpleeeease · 19/12/2025 19:09

DappledThings · 19/12/2025 18:54

Because they don't look scruffy. They just don't look formal. And formal clearly isn't the look they were going for

They never look formal, that’s not the issue.

DappledThings · 19/12/2025 19:12

Ohpleeeease · 19/12/2025 19:09

They never look formal, that’s not the issue.

What is the issue then? Lilibet's hair looks to be naturally wavy and a bit fluffy. It doesn't look knotted or unkempt. It just isn't artifically smoothed out or particularly styled. It is bizarre to me that this is considered worthy of criticism.

cockandbullstories · 19/12/2025 19:13

OlympicWomen · 19/12/2025 18:34

All these celebrity photos get digitally altered. I think they've just tried to change his hair a bit.

It hasn't worked very well ! 😂

cockandbullstories · 19/12/2025 19:18

BigWillyLittleTodger · 19/12/2025 18:50

The hypocrisy is off the scale, Harry bleating on about his awful destiny of being the royal spare and his whole life being played out in public but here they are trying to push their tiny children into a life of public “philanthropy” 🙄, it really seems as if they are trying to be America’s first family, in a country that doesn’t recognise titles. I suspect this is the start of setting the kids up to be rivals to William and Catherine’s children, it’s started sooner than I thought it would, I didn’t think it would be so blatant until they were teenagers.

Indeed!

OlympicWomen · 19/12/2025 19:20

cockandbullstories · 19/12/2025 19:13

It hasn't worked very well ! 😂

No, I think the photoshop could have been better!

Justdancevance · 19/12/2025 20:02

Lilibets hair is like my children’s - really fine with a curl / wave when they were that age until they wre teens.

But I don’t think fine hair like that would ever get long enough to sit on like Harry claimed, it’s too fine and delicate.

Raisondeetre · 19/12/2025 20:23

MaturingCheeseball · 19/12/2025 19:02

I would never criticise the children’s appearance - the picture just looks a bit odd size-wise - a bit stretched somehow.

However I will gladly criticise Harry’s hair. Look, mate, you need a best friend and a mirror. Those transplants haven’t taken and you’ve got werewolf bits on the side and some bum fluff on the top. Just accept your genes and shave the lot off. It really would look a whole lot better. Or if you can’t bear to be like your brother, get one of those glue-on wigs that male rock stars/celebrities wear. But the current sparse crop teased on your bonce looks daft.

The Royal men really don’t age well.

OlympicWomen · 19/12/2025 20:33

Harry is only 41!

Phase42 · 19/12/2025 21:05

The photo has definitely been manipulated in some way. Lilibets feet are disproportionate. Why on earth would you put a photo out in the public domain that has a strangeness to it?!

elprup · 19/12/2025 21:11

I’m no fan of Harry and Meghan, but to people saying their daughter’s hair looks messy - seriously?! 🤔 It looks absolutely normal and fine!

elprup · 19/12/2025 21:16

Harry’s on the other hand….!

Dorsetlucky · 19/12/2025 21:32

Phase42 · 19/12/2025 21:05

The photo has definitely been manipulated in some way. Lilibets feet are disproportionate. Why on earth would you put a photo out in the public domain that has a strangeness to it?!

Also, Lilibet’s hands look odd. She and Meghan are not holding hands in a natural way - perhaps they’re AI manipulated? As is Harry’s head, I think. There’s just something really off about the whole photo - it’s in such a beautiful setting, it should look wholesome but instead the effect is creepy as heck.

RockaLock · 19/12/2025 21:39

I think the photo was definitely intended as their Christmas photo for the masses, as the caption underneath it on Meghan’s Instagram feed says “Happy Holidays! From our family to yours” 🤷‍♀️

And yes, I agree with PPs, why would you wear a see-through skirt and publish a photo with the sun shining straight through it? Where is that famous attention to detail?!

Definitely a lot of odd and obvious photoshopping going on:
-something odd above Harry’s head
-Lilibet’s leg curves very oddly into her foot
-Meghan’s elbow looks very sharp, something very off about it
-Meghan’s heel/ankle, also very odd.

I get that people want to photoshop their photos, but why you would not do it properly is beyond me! I’m sure that she won’t be forced to issue a public apology/explanation for it, though…

jeffgoldblum · 19/12/2025 21:42

Op ! @GreyPlayer, I want you to know that I hold you responsible for the comments on this thread towards the Sussex’s and their children!
you have provocatively started numerous threads on a board by your own definition is critical of h and m , you then misled posters into thinking a informal seasonal picture clearly geared towards their fans and supporters from Meghans instagram account was an official Christmas card ( I have posted the correct one ) . I should not be in the position of defending them because one of their own fans have set them up for criticism!

MrsFinkelstein · 19/12/2025 21:44

Raisondeetre · 19/12/2025 18:50

Yes but they are presenting these images to the world to be pored over.

Exactly. I'd much prefer H&M not feature their children at all. It was the one decision they made that I wholeheartedly supported them on. But they've gone back on their decision to not feature them. So you get this weird situation when the children are used to promote their financial endeavours, but in a faux coy "you can't see their full faces so we're not exploiting our children on SM you plebs".

If they don't want people possibly talking negatively about their children in any way - DON'T PUT THEM ON YOUR PUBLIC SOCIAL MEDIA. It's not rocket science FFS.

You put them out there - people will discuss it.

What really riles me, is that they put their kids out their and give the public cause to comment in possible negative ways. If you're going to do it, make damn sure your kids have their hair brushed and they look neat. My DD hated getting her hair brushed when she was a similar age. Most of the time it was a battle I chose not to have. Except when photos that others were going to see were getting taken.

Ugh, I hate that those children are being put in this position. So unfair to them.

CurlewKate · 19/12/2025 21:44

MaturingCheeseball · 19/12/2025 17:04

Why is Lily bigger than Archie? Odd picture.

Because she’s closer to the camera.

Ohpleeeease · 19/12/2025 21:47

DappledThings · 19/12/2025 19:12

What is the issue then? Lilibet's hair looks to be naturally wavy and a bit fluffy. It doesn't look knotted or unkempt. It just isn't artifically smoothed out or particularly styled. It is bizarre to me that this is considered worthy of criticism.

Not by me, you’re directing your ire at the wrong person. I haven’t commented on the girl’s appearance at all.

CraftyGin · 19/12/2025 21:54

Mylovelygreendress · 19/12/2025 17:08

Do young girls usually wear long white socks in the US ?

It's unusual.

When we lived in the USA with three young girls, we had our friends in the UK send us socks.

OlympicWomen · 19/12/2025 22:01

MrsFinkelstein · 19/12/2025 21:44

Exactly. I'd much prefer H&M not feature their children at all. It was the one decision they made that I wholeheartedly supported them on. But they've gone back on their decision to not feature them. So you get this weird situation when the children are used to promote their financial endeavours, but in a faux coy "you can't see their full faces so we're not exploiting our children on SM you plebs".

If they don't want people possibly talking negatively about their children in any way - DON'T PUT THEM ON YOUR PUBLIC SOCIAL MEDIA. It's not rocket science FFS.

You put them out there - people will discuss it.

What really riles me, is that they put their kids out their and give the public cause to comment in possible negative ways. If you're going to do it, make damn sure your kids have their hair brushed and they look neat. My DD hated getting her hair brushed when she was a similar age. Most of the time it was a battle I chose not to have. Except when photos that others were going to see were getting taken.

Ugh, I hate that those children are being put in this position. So unfair to them.

Yes but they need to have their kids on social media and in the headlines and being discussed because it keeps up the interest and the celebrity status. They're Brand Sussex and it's got to be frequently promoted.

BasiliskStare · 19/12/2025 22:02

@RockaLock why would you wear a see-through skirt and publish a photo with the sun shining straight through it?

Sweet nod to Diana ? 😊

No , forget I spoke

OlympicWomen · 19/12/2025 22:05

RockaLock · 19/12/2025 21:39

I think the photo was definitely intended as their Christmas photo for the masses, as the caption underneath it on Meghan’s Instagram feed says “Happy Holidays! From our family to yours” 🤷‍♀️

And yes, I agree with PPs, why would you wear a see-through skirt and publish a photo with the sun shining straight through it? Where is that famous attention to detail?!

Definitely a lot of odd and obvious photoshopping going on:
-something odd above Harry’s head
-Lilibet’s leg curves very oddly into her foot
-Meghan’s elbow looks very sharp, something very off about it
-Meghan’s heel/ankle, also very odd.

I get that people want to photoshop their photos, but why you would not do it properly is beyond me! I’m sure that she won’t be forced to issue a public apology/explanation for it, though…

Yes! Remember the response when that happened with the Wales family photo. The photo was withdrawn and Kate issued an apology.
Perhaps that will happen here?.

Swipe left for the next trending thread