Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Why is Meghan hated?

1000 replies

YourBrickTiger · 07/10/2025 13:26

I have very strong views about the Royals especially Camilla, however I am genuinely interested and want to find out more as to why Meghan Markle seems to be so hated. I'm asking in case there is something I have missed. I do read up as much as I can and watch shows from 'both sides' of the argument, but there is nothing that I have seen so far that warrants the level of sheer hatred geared towards her - I don't mean on here necessarily, but on social media in general. She cannot do ANYTHING without a swarm of people descending on her like vampires to tear her apart.

She isn't an adulteress, she's not a paedophile or sex offender, she isn't lazy, she seems to genuinely care about people in need.....and from what has been shown, she genuinely loves Harry and is just trying to make a life with him. He left the UK to start a life away from a nest of some awful people, his mother died when he was 12, his uncle is a sex offender, there is racism and a rigid set of rules within that family where he won't be king anyway so what is wrong with him leaving?

I'm not starting this to start an argument I am genuninely interested in why she is so rabidly disliked and why? Maybe I will start to feel differently if there is more of a reason but at the moment I cannot see one?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
springerb88 · 07/10/2025 16:54

A lot of the people who dislike her are most probably Daily Mail readers and believe everything they read in DM's ongoing hate campaign that has targeted her.

Bladderpool · 07/10/2025 16:57

springerb88 · 07/10/2025 16:54

A lot of the people who dislike her are most probably Daily Mail readers and believe everything they read in DM's ongoing hate campaign that has targeted her.

The DM is amateurish compared with YouTube, the vitriol on there is terrifying. I can actually understand Harry’s security concerns when you look at some of the videos and comments on there.

Catpuss66 · 07/10/2025 16:58

80smonster · 07/10/2025 14:50

Bit of a grifter I reckon. I don’t dislike that she & Harry parted company with the RF. As a brand (if that’s what they are) they’re a bit talentless and lack any real focus for anyone to get worked up about? Lovely pot of jam anyone? The Martha Stewart routine is a bit lost on me.

Think she is making a lot of money from Jam….maybe that’s what you don’t like.

SynysterGates · 07/10/2025 16:58

kirinm · 07/10/2025 16:34

You only hear about the things she does if you actively read about it. I hear the odd thing said about Harry - such as the meeting with Charles - but I rarely see anything about her because I don’t go looking for it. I’ve not watched their TV shows, not read his book, don’t follow them on any social media. The unhinged that post on the royal family threads actively go looking for information to attack her for. It’s nuts.

So true. They must be fans,as they are obsessed with looking for stuff about her.

ILikeDinosaurs · 07/10/2025 16:59

U53rName · 07/10/2025 13:32

Jealousy

Xenophobia

Racism

In a nutshell.

She has a strong independent streak, seems to be a woman who knows her own mind, knows her rights and is not afraid to stick up for herself. She seems to be someone who knows how to live life to the fullest, like Harry said, she told him "life is for thriving, not just existing" (or something like that), that is her motto, I guess.

All this is incompatible with the royal expectations of be quiet and obedient, curtsey and have no opinions - all this rubs some people up the wrong way. I find her admirable, personally.

SumUp · 07/10/2025 17:00

It wouldn’t surprise me to learn that it was a calculated smear campaign by the firm. If the great unwashed are hating Megan, they are distracted from the obscene privilege when ordinary families are struggling to afford the basics, and the dodgy Andrew saga.

wordler · 07/10/2025 17:00

Bladderpool · 07/10/2025 16:57

The DM is amateurish compared with YouTube, the vitriol on there is terrifying. I can actually understand Harry’s security concerns when you look at some of the videos and comments on there.

Actually, Twitter is the worst, and it's very tribal. Some of the supporters of Harry and Meghan have been awful about William and Kate and even their kids. Even before H&M left their roles, the palace had hire someone to monitor the comment sections on the royal IG and Twitter because of the hate that was being written about Meghan and Kate by two distinct 'tribes' of fans.

Catpuss66 · 07/10/2025 17:03

SeaAndStars · 07/10/2025 14:52

You might not like her but you aren't correct that Camilla has not 'done nothing for her entire life'.

She has raised two (successful and seemingly very happy children), is grandmother to five.

She's campaigned and raised money for the Osteoporosis Society for over 30 years and is president or patron of over 100 charities.

In particular she had done a huge amount to raise awareness and help survivors of sexual and domestic violence. She also has a long record of work in animal welfare, literacy and homelessness etc.

I would agree but as campaigner against DV very strange she didn’t call out her mates Piers Morgan & Jeremy Clarkson from verbally abusing her daughter in law . ( remember parading her naked throwing things at her, nearly like the taliban treat women) not a murmur from Camilla.

Hurdygurdy123 · 07/10/2025 17:13

The right wing press, the Murdoch types. When they take dislike to someone or think there's a story they can whip up then they promote the unfair pursuit of people. Look at Neil Kinnock who was picked on for having red hair. Menzies Campbell for looking old, etc, etc.

If you've not see it watch "The Hack" on ITV.

Once the press have ignited opinions in those who don't want to think for themselves, it grows on social media.

BoudiccaRuled · 07/10/2025 17:14

I think it's because we were all rooting for them at the beginning. We thought they were great - she was so pretty, Harry had finally found someone prepared to marry him... then they did a total 180° turn and showed their nasty selves.
We feel like they cheated us. If they'd gone off and pottered around doing charity work we would still think they were great, but they blew everything up.
I think that's why.

Catpuss66 · 07/10/2025 17:15

BeardofHagrid · 07/10/2025 15:22

Because she’s a home wrecker. She cut her husband off from his family and friends. Having a perpetually smug face doesn’t help, even if she can’t help it.

I used to be a big Meghan fan. But there were so many red flags. One family member at her wedding, I mean it’s not normal is it. Vaguely implying something racist was said by a member of the RF. (I always say if you’re going to make allegations, at least be specific.) Mock curtsying the Queen.

So many things she did seemed done with the sole purpose of winding British people up.

Many families are estranged, especially blended families it is normal. the not normal aspect was her Dad getting paid to pose for pictures then lying about it, not turning up for his daughters wedding, then her half sister slagging her off to all & sundry. Also strange to 2 people that were outed regarding the skin colour comments were Charles & Kate then both got cancer ……strange so no one could say anything to them.
yes I agree she can be ott though but not sure it was worth the hatred & vitriol she got.

Calliopespa · 07/10/2025 17:16

What I think is really off is the criticism of their children. There was a really unkind post the other day saying how Meghan had reported Archie had asked when his next birthday was and posters were saying, effectively, how could the kid be so dumb as to not know at his age.

Whatever you might think of the parents and their behaviour, criticising the children should be off-limits.

rwalker · 07/10/2025 17:18

No idea tbh
but it’s some going when

  1. your own family
  2. the family you married into
  3. people you worked with
  4. people who worked for you
  5. a big chunk of the public

din gave a good word to say about you or don’t speak to you

it’s not just the royal family that don’t get on with her it seems to be anyone she has contact with

bluegreygreen · 07/10/2025 17:19

I don't think there's anyone in public life whom I 'hate'.

Like many, and several on this thread, I was pleased for both of them at the start. Their own behaviours, particularly at the time of his grandparents' illnesses and deaths, and the repeated lies (in their own words, not media spin) mean that I no longer have any respect for them.

I now look with interest to see what they're doing next, but my main hope is that the children are OK.

Baital · 07/10/2025 17:20

Topseyt123 · 07/10/2025 16:14

No, he wasn't. He could only be free to marry her if he first abdicated, that was the choice he was given and he took it. That doesn't mean that it wasn't a ridiculous rule though, but divorce was quite a dirty word back then. He also did turn out to be a Nazi sympathiser in the end so would have been a totally unsuitable King, especially at that time (late thirties and during WWII).

I personally think though that once his Nazi sympathiser credentials became clear then he could well have been forced to abdicate anyway. We couldn't have a Nazi sympathiser as monarch, could we!

The abdication may have been a blessing in disguise really. So King George VI would probably have come to the throne eventually anyway, and then his daughter, Princess Elizabeth. We would still have the current crop of royals.

Times have changed, the royals must change too if they are to remain relevant. I don't think divorce and abdication should necessarily remain dirty words in royal circles. If course abdication should not happen willy nilly, but there can be times of need, such as advancing age and serious illnes/encroaching disability etc.

That's my opinion.

Edited

And 150 or so years ago royals would have had to have an arranged marriage to a foreign royal. The male royals could have mistresses as long as they kept their public image respectable.

And the women give birth with Privy Councillors in the room to confirm that the baby was theirs.

Etc etc

Things move on, rules and norms change.

AutumnnotFall · 07/10/2025 17:21

YourBrickTiger · 07/10/2025 16:28

I have more respect for Meghan for speaking her mind, and being who she is BUT it doesn't fit with the RF. I find it difficult that in this day and age a woman has to act the way Kate does because she wants to be queen one day. It must be so stifling. But then there is a begrudging respect there too that she is able to do it.

Oh definately; that is not a life, or mould I would wish to be in. It must be hard work maintaining the image, I couldn't do it, so respect definately. I'd rather be in Cali being true to myself, and enjoying the sunshine!

bluegreygreen · 07/10/2025 17:28

I think Catherine is simply professional, in the same way that I am at work. The difference is that for her, work starts as soon as she enters a public space - and that is what I would not be able to do.

I'm sure she is very different in her private persona, as most of us are.

SeaAndStars · 07/10/2025 17:32

Catpuss66 · 07/10/2025 17:03

I would agree but as campaigner against DV very strange she didn’t call out her mates Piers Morgan & Jeremy Clarkson from verbally abusing her daughter in law . ( remember parading her naked throwing things at her, nearly like the taliban treat women) not a murmur from Camilla.

Morgan and Clarkson have behaved appallingly over Meghan. I don't know why you are linking that with domestic violence.

That aside, what could Camilla do? Get into a personal spat with the misogynist pigs? Dignify every insult with a response?

www.royal.uk/the-queens-work-on-violence-against-women

CrinkleCutSteak · 07/10/2025 17:42

netflixfan · 07/10/2025 16:35

I don’t hate her but that book, spare, and the Oprah interview. They are both spiteful liars her and Harry.

Harry’s victim complex is insane.

I don’t really line Meghan, but I can understand her POV and why she did certain things, doesn’t like her in laws etc .

Harry on the other hand is a perpetual victim who sold out his family. He’s so whiny and awful. No decorum to keep family affairs private. No acknowledgement that he may not be the paragon of virtue himself.

Nannyfannybanny · 07/10/2025 17:48

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

PrawnofthePatriarchy · 07/10/2025 17:55

I had no interest in Meghan before the wedding. People are now talking about her race but at the time I thought she was Hispanic from her appearance. I've always liked Harry so I was pleased he'd found love. Just general goodwill.

But then I watched the wedding... Because I love weddings. And as I watched I became increasingly uncomfortable. Harry looked so very happy - just how a groom should look. But she didn't. I watched trying to work out what she was feeling. And then suddenly it came to me. She wasn't happy. She was triumphant!

It was disturbing. And it put me right off her. I don't hate her. But I don't trust or like her.

NewGirlInTown · 07/10/2025 17:55

For God’s Sake; why are you all over Mumsnet talking about that creature?
Is it Sussex Squad bonus week??
How I wish we could block individual posters on here.

beaniebabby · 07/10/2025 18:03

But she appears not to have liked Royal life.

It's this largely, she had the gall to criticise the gilded cage. The serfs are happy to defer to the Royals but if they complain about their "wonderful lives" it's a slap in the face.

Throw in misogyny, racism, jealousy plus some people see the Royals as a posher version of Eastenders, there always has to be a baddie.

beaniebabby · 07/10/2025 18:04

she isn't a black woman,

🤦🏻‍♀️

beaniebabby · 07/10/2025 18:05

I find it difficult that in this day and age a woman has to act the way Kate does because she wants to be queen one day.

It's so reductive in 2025!

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.