Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Netflix deal to end

1000 replies

AtIusvue · 22/07/2025 22:51

https://www.thesun.co.uk/royals/35969847/prince-harry-meghan-netflix-deal-axed/

Netflix deal is over

  • Both decided a statement won’t be released “Publicly, there will not be a statement and of course, if things change dramatically, they’d be open to a one-off project down the line.”
  • Talk about Paramount plus

It’s been pretty obvious for a while. No talk about the Archewell productions arm, the film they were making etc.

How long can As ever last when they won’t have NF to back it up with WLM infomercials.

Meghan Markle holding a bag of pretzels in a kitchen.

Prince Harry and Meghan’s £100million deal with Netflix SCRAPPED

PRINCE Harry and wife Meghan’s £100million deal with Netflix has been scrapped. The streamer will not renew their contract when it expires in September. The Sussexes and Netflix have mutually decid…

https://www.thesun.co.uk/royals/35969847/prince-harry-meghan-netflix-deal-axed/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
45
IdaGlossop · 24/07/2025 23:13

ShesTheAlbatross · 24/07/2025 21:35

If true, that last sentence seems… naive.

As Diana was William's mother too, I think a worsening of the brothers' relationship is more likely than an improvement.

Ohpleeeease · 25/07/2025 00:24

I’d have to question whether Harry is uniquely placed to talk about his mother in any meaningful way, given his age when she died. Or indeed whether there’s enough material. Fascinating as Diana was, I’d struggle to sit through a multi-part series.

I also think that releasing it to coincide with the anniversary of her death is downright macabre. What idiot came up with that?

Mullingar · 25/07/2025 00:31

BasiliskStare · 24/07/2025 16:48

@CathyorClaire Thanks for those photos of the house.

It's not my cup of tea but apart from the matter of the $14m (which in my case I have not got - naming of parts etc - & I am more of living somewhere I can pop to the corner shop , walk to the drs etc - but my preference - not everyone is the same)

That house strikes me as a sort of 1920s Gloria Swanson , old Hollywood glamour sort of thing ( albeit reconstructed. ) I can see why they might like it. If it's just under 7 acres , I have a friend with a house in Hampshire who has 6 acres and she wouldn't call it an estate, more of a massive garden at the front. Anyway it doesn't matter - they like it and that's what matters to them - but they do need to factor in upkeep etc from their own money.

I am curious to see what's coming down the line for them. I would not like to think KC would bail them out a bit. Even from private money - because ( whilst I support a constitutional Monarchy - I am not oblivious to the fact that private wealth gets passed down IHT free from Monarch to Monarch. (& I think this would bear better scrutiny)

I'm going to be fascinated to know where they turn next for proper money. It may be one of M's investments will pay off - all good if so

If it's just under 7 acres ,

I am surprised by that - thats only about 3 football pitches - and the house footprint, patio, pool, garages and driveway must take up one football pitch.

CoffeeCantata · 25/07/2025 05:57

Profhilodisaster · 24/07/2025 23:09

Harry is so unequipped for life outside of the royal family, he is totally reliant on others to feed him opportunities to make money, he doesn't seem to be a charismatic speaker (going by recent speeches anyway) and hasn't got any depth of knowledge to be an interesting after dinner speaker, the only thing he has is his mother and people are tiring of him using her for publicity.
He must have been so cock sure that his position in the RF would be enough to make him money, which it maybe could have done if only he'd had the brains not to write such a damaging book or done the awful OW interview. I can't believe he didn't read Spare before it was published and realise that some of it would backfire on him. I mean, I'm sure we've all written an email or sm post , reread it and thought that sounds a bit naff/harsh/rude etc. and edited it.
He has ploughed on in the same vein and hasn't learnt anything and I wonder if it's too late to turn things around.

His recent record as a speaker is awful - showing an embarrassing lack of judgement. I’m still cringing at his accusing John Travolta of dining out on his dance with Diana. Ugh…the ill-judged “joke”, the crassness of an ignorant, spoilt younger man being cheeky to an established star who had treated him with courtesy, plus the irony of Harry’s “dining out” on the trauma of his mother’s death to anyone who’ll pay.

The men in grey suits used to write his speeches, didn’t they?

NormaMajors1992coat · 25/07/2025 06:28

It’s common practice to attach programming like this to anniversaries, I don’t think there’s a problem there. There will be other stuff happening and press coverage so it makes sense to tie in with that. But I do wonder who would be interested in watching a multi episode series about Diana these days.

Profhilodisaster · 25/07/2025 06:47

Ohpleeeease · 25/07/2025 00:24

I’d have to question whether Harry is uniquely placed to talk about his mother in any meaningful way, given his age when she died. Or indeed whether there’s enough material. Fascinating as Diana was, I’d struggle to sit through a multi-part series.

I also think that releasing it to coincide with the anniversary of her death is downright macabre. What idiot came up with that?

Didnt he write in Spare that he hasn't got many memories of his mother as he has blocked them out .

CoffeeCantata · 25/07/2025 06:56

NormaMajors1992coat · 25/07/2025 06:28

It’s common practice to attach programming like this to anniversaries, I don’t think there’s a problem there. There will be other stuff happening and press coverage so it makes sense to tie in with that. But I do wonder who would be interested in watching a multi episode series about Diana these days.

And is there anything new to be said? At this distance the only interest would surely be an objective historical assessment, rather than a personal, sentimental hagiography from her son who couldn’t have known much at the time about what was going on (unlike William, who seems to have been burdened with too much on that score).

As is often mentioned on these threads, a really close scrutiny of Diana’s life after her marriage would be bound to show her in a less than perfect light. I’m sure H had no intention of going there, so the result would inevitably be a saccharine ramble through the well-worn cliches. I guess the interest to Netflix, or whoever was producing it would be more unsavoury revelations about Pa and maybe William.

BigAnne · 25/07/2025 07:48

Ohpleeeease · 25/07/2025 00:24

I’d have to question whether Harry is uniquely placed to talk about his mother in any meaningful way, given his age when she died. Or indeed whether there’s enough material. Fascinating as Diana was, I’d struggle to sit through a multi-part series.

I also think that releasing it to coincide with the anniversary of her death is downright macabre. What idiot came up with that?

I'm sure he said somewhere that he had very little memory of his mother.

Profhilodisaster · 25/07/2025 07:50

BigAnne · 25/07/2025 07:48

I'm sure he said somewhere that he had very little memory of his mother.

Yep , said he'd blocked it all out. So if he suddenly comes back speaking about all the lovely memories he has , it'll just add to the list of lies .

pilates · 25/07/2025 08:04

I really hope Harry doesn’t do a documentary about Diana. That is scrapping the barrel and leaves a bad taste in the mouth. It would be an all time low even for him.

Ohpleeeease · 25/07/2025 08:27

NormaMajors1992coat · 25/07/2025 06:28

It’s common practice to attach programming like this to anniversaries, I don’t think there’s a problem there. There will be other stuff happening and press coverage so it makes sense to tie in with that. But I do wonder who would be interested in watching a multi episode series about Diana these days.

I suppose, Being common practice doesn’t make it any less inappropriate though. I can see why it might happen for long dead historical figures like generals and Heads of State, but the very fact of the tragedy of her death and all that surrounded it makes it (in my view) exactly the wrong time to remember her.

It’s not a period anyone could be proud of.

StaySpicy · 25/07/2025 09:02

StartupRepair · 24/07/2025 22:21

Two thoughts.

  1. Surely if a small batch sells out you quickly follow it up with a larger batch, to actually make more profit and continue to generate income?

2.I do see the appeal of their house (I must like Country/Russian oligarch early 2000s style) but I hate the room they have as their office. Hate the way they are side by side at an uncomfortable white stone table with no proper monitor or work stuff around. House that size I would be in my own proper office and I wouldn't want Harry sitting next to me watching YouTube while I was working.

Edited

I agree about the study (not the house though - not my taste!).

I saw a photo of Meghan on her laptop in that study (maybe the 40x40 weird thing that was supposed to happen) and she had her laptop on the desk propped up on a stack of books (so she was the right height on the camera, I imagine). It just looked so temporary I remember thinking that she clearly doesn't actually do much work in there because if it really was a home office, as you say, there'd be second monitor and perhaps a keyboard and a laptop stand and other stuff you accumulate to make everything easier in your working life. She has none of that.

NormaMajors1992coat · 25/07/2025 09:09

Ohpleeeease · 25/07/2025 08:27

I suppose, Being common practice doesn’t make it any less inappropriate though. I can see why it might happen for long dead historical figures like generals and Heads of State, but the very fact of the tragedy of her death and all that surrounded it makes it (in my view) exactly the wrong time to remember her.

It’s not a period anyone could be proud of.

I get what you mean, it’s just a convenient hook to hang programmes on when there will be other things happening to help make a bit of a moment. I used to pitch programme ideas to commissioners and we always started with a list of anniversaries and notable dates. You know that if you don’t get in there with something for the anniversary of Pearl Harbor or Shakespeare’s birth or whatever, others will. It happens all the time, with other tragic events like 9/11 and Lockerbie recently. Even the doc about Last Christmas was 40 years since the song was released. People just seem to like this kind of commemoration.

(I agree it’s a bit weird and contrived though. A lazy way to commission I think. And the amount of times things got turned down because there was an anniversary coming up in 6 years or whatever 🤦‍♀️)

Velmy · 25/07/2025 09:10

EmpressSisi · 23/07/2025 10:34

From what I understand, Season 2 is really just Part 2 of Season 1—similar to how Twilight, Harry Potter, and Squid Game split their final installments into two parts for some reason.

Part 2 is expected to drop late summer, possibly to line up with a new seasonal range launch? But it was all filmed at the same time as the first installment.

Two reasons...

  1. They only incur one set of production costs as opposed to filming two parts of a movie/series separately.

  2. On Netflix' end, they get a subscriber boost when a new season/movie airs. So by splitting something into two parts, they'll get a second wave.

BoudiccaRuled · 25/07/2025 09:12

Profhilodisaster · 25/07/2025 07:50

Yep , said he'd blocked it all out. So if he suddenly comes back speaking about all the lovely memories he has , it'll just add to the list of lies .

He could ever only do a very one-sided documentary anyway, even using other people's memories. He could never investment hate Diana's manipulation of the press, or the public's extremely dim view of her prior to her death, or the sheer bafflement of many at the extreme public reaction to her death. He would have to publicly acknowledge that she wasn't a saint, or regarded as a saint by many, many people. Her death was like social media nowadays, only the people voicing their opinion are visible. Millions upon millions have little or no opinion (or don't believe in speaking ill of the dead).

Vespanest · 25/07/2025 09:17

It's not in good taste for a Diana series when the person producing has a clear emotional bias. I very much doubt Harry would be able to avoid a vindictive narrative. Harry has been open he doesn't believe the inquiries and I'm not sure if it will be only the press he will blame. Even if he was aiming for a positive spin the people providing the money will want dirt. I could not see Charles and Camilla not being dragged especially Camilla.

Hoolahoophop · 25/07/2025 09:18

Per an anon source, “The idea is that it would be a solo project for Harry, who would be a co-executive producer as well as hosting and narrating the series. He is uniquely placed, not only to talk about the woman he knew as his mother, but also to examine her role as an enduring social and cultural icon still beloved by so many.”

As others have said, he has said he doesn't have that many memories of his mother, and to be honest, those that he does have will be very, very selective. At that age we tend to idolize our parents and only see the good in them. Most kids think their parents are the best ever. Its only as we get older, get to know our parents as individuals, recognize and accept their their flaws as well as their good traits that we have a true understanding of their character. The tragedy of Diana's early death was that Harry and William never got that opportunity. They were too young. Harry in particular seems unable to see his mothers full character so he would be to be honest the very worst person to do a balanced documentary about her life.

DelectableMe · 25/07/2025 09:27

That's because he only sees his mother in relation to himself, ie it's his loss and his trauma. He really doesn't want to look at her life objectively, because she wasn't a saint, which most people understand, but I suspect he does not.

NormaMajors1992coat · 25/07/2025 09:28

He also thinks she was “basically murdered”, which is not exactly an objective or balanced opinion 😬

Ohpleeeease · 25/07/2025 09:52

NormaMajors1992coat · 25/07/2025 09:09

I get what you mean, it’s just a convenient hook to hang programmes on when there will be other things happening to help make a bit of a moment. I used to pitch programme ideas to commissioners and we always started with a list of anniversaries and notable dates. You know that if you don’t get in there with something for the anniversary of Pearl Harbor or Shakespeare’s birth or whatever, others will. It happens all the time, with other tragic events like 9/11 and Lockerbie recently. Even the doc about Last Christmas was 40 years since the song was released. People just seem to like this kind of commemoration.

(I agree it’s a bit weird and contrived though. A lazy way to commission I think. And the amount of times things got turned down because there was an anniversary coming up in 6 years or whatever 🤦‍♀️)

I do agree with you about it being common practice and it’s entirely appropriate if it raises awareness about people and events in a meaningful way. But this seems quite the wrong anniversary to commemorate.

IF indeed it happens - I realise we’re in the realms of wild speculation now as so many of these things come to nothing or were just rumour in the first place.

DelectableMe · 25/07/2025 09:54

NormaMajors1992coat · 25/07/2025 09:28

He also thinks she was “basically murdered”, which is not exactly an objective or balanced opinion 😬

Quite 🙄

Puzzledandpissedoff · 25/07/2025 10:05

Thedom · 24/07/2025 21:07

There were rumours a while back that Harry would be involved somehow in an upcoming documentary about Diana, either narrating it or producing it. If that’s true, I wonder if that is something which will be developed by Archewell and offered to Netflix. I think Diana or RF are about the only thing which would garner any interest.

But who would produce it, Thedom?
Clearly Harry hasn't the capability for ... well, anything really ... and while I suppose someone might bitee if there's money to be made, is there reallyy anyone left who's prepared to risk working with him?

Speaking of which, what's happening with BetterUp? I've not heard anything at all about that recentlyy, not even in Harry's silly speeches, and wonder if they're still paying him to promote the thng

CathyorClaire · 25/07/2025 10:20

Mylovelygreendress · 24/07/2025 15:46

I thought it was a 4 book deal ? If so where are the other books ? Was The Bench one ?

My post replying to this is still hidden (😡) so I'll try again.

The deal has always been shrouded in secrecy but the Mirror link I posted suggests a collaboration on leadership and philanthropy (no irony there 😆) and a wellness book from Rachel.

PRH published 'The Bench' so it's always possible it was part of the original deal but none of it is very clear and I suspect it's all been quietly dropped now anyway.

I won't post the link again in case that was part of the issue 😕

coolmum123 · 25/07/2025 10:35

Velmy · 25/07/2025 09:10

Two reasons...

  1. They only incur one set of production costs as opposed to filming two parts of a movie/series separately.

  2. On Netflix' end, they get a subscriber boost when a new season/movie airs. So by splitting something into two parts, they'll get a second wave.

  1. there was an agreement that there would be 2 seasons but Netflix knew that they weren’t renewing so split season 1 and sold it to them as a double launch of items
CathyorClaire · 25/07/2025 10:38

Speaking of which, what's happening with BetterUp? I've not heard anything at all about that recentlyy, not even in Harry's silly speeches, and wonder if they're still paying him to promote the thng

He's still on the website, Puzzled but as you say it's all gone pretty quiet.

Maybe their Chief Impact Officer is failing to make an impact as with so much else?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.